Cargando…

A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy

The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baz-Valle, Eneko, Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos, Alix-Fages, Carlos, Santos-Concejero, Jordan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291645
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017
_version_ 1784660266608230400
author Baz-Valle, Eneko
Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos
Alix-Fages, Carlos
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
author_facet Baz-Valle, Eneko
Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos
Alix-Fages, Carlos
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
author_sort Baz-Valle, Eneko
collection PubMed
description The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: a) studies were randomized controlled trials (with the number of sets explicitly reported), b) interventions lasted at least six weeks, c) participants had a minimum of one year of resistance training experience, d) participants’ age ranged from 18 to 35 years, e) studies reported direct measurements of muscle thickness and/or the cross-sectional area, and f) studies were published in peer-review journals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas just six were included in the quantitative analysis. All participants were divided into three groups: “low” (<12 weekly sets), “moderate” (12-20 weekly sets) and “high” volume (>20 weekly sets). According to the results of this meta-analysis, there were no differences between moderate and high training volume responses for the quadriceps (p = 0.19) and the biceps brachii (p = 0.59). However, it appears that a high training volume is better to induce muscle mass gains in the triceps brachii (p = 0.01). According to the results of this review, a range of 12-20 weekly sets per muscle group may be an optimum standard recommendation for increasing muscle hypertrophy in young, trained men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8884877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88848772022-03-14 A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy Baz-Valle, Eneko Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Carlos Santos-Concejero, Jordan J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: a) studies were randomized controlled trials (with the number of sets explicitly reported), b) interventions lasted at least six weeks, c) participants had a minimum of one year of resistance training experience, d) participants’ age ranged from 18 to 35 years, e) studies reported direct measurements of muscle thickness and/or the cross-sectional area, and f) studies were published in peer-review journals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas just six were included in the quantitative analysis. All participants were divided into three groups: “low” (<12 weekly sets), “moderate” (12-20 weekly sets) and “high” volume (>20 weekly sets). According to the results of this meta-analysis, there were no differences between moderate and high training volume responses for the quadriceps (p = 0.19) and the biceps brachii (p = 0.59). However, it appears that a high training volume is better to induce muscle mass gains in the triceps brachii (p = 0.01). According to the results of this review, a range of 12-20 weekly sets per muscle group may be an optimum standard recommendation for increasing muscle hypertrophy in young, trained men. Sciendo 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8884877/ /pubmed/35291645 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017 Text en © 2022 Eneko Baz-Valle, Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Jordan Santos-Concejero, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section III - Sports Training
Baz-Valle, Eneko
Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos
Alix-Fages, Carlos
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title_full A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title_short A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
title_sort systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy
topic Section III - Sports Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291645
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT bazvalleeneko asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT balsalobrefernandezcarlos asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT alixfagescarlos asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT santosconcejerojordan asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT bazvalleeneko systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT balsalobrefernandezcarlos systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT alixfagescarlos systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy
AT santosconcejerojordan systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy