Cargando…
A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy
The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291645 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017 |
_version_ | 1784660266608230400 |
---|---|
author | Baz-Valle, Eneko Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Carlos Santos-Concejero, Jordan |
author_facet | Baz-Valle, Eneko Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Carlos Santos-Concejero, Jordan |
author_sort | Baz-Valle, Eneko |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: a) studies were randomized controlled trials (with the number of sets explicitly reported), b) interventions lasted at least six weeks, c) participants had a minimum of one year of resistance training experience, d) participants’ age ranged from 18 to 35 years, e) studies reported direct measurements of muscle thickness and/or the cross-sectional area, and f) studies were published in peer-review journals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas just six were included in the quantitative analysis. All participants were divided into three groups: “low” (<12 weekly sets), “moderate” (12-20 weekly sets) and “high” volume (>20 weekly sets). According to the results of this meta-analysis, there were no differences between moderate and high training volume responses for the quadriceps (p = 0.19) and the biceps brachii (p = 0.59). However, it appears that a high training volume is better to induce muscle mass gains in the triceps brachii (p = 0.01). According to the results of this review, a range of 12-20 weekly sets per muscle group may be an optimum standard recommendation for increasing muscle hypertrophy in young, trained men. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8884877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88848772022-03-14 A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy Baz-Valle, Eneko Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Carlos Santos-Concejero, Jordan J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: a) studies were randomized controlled trials (with the number of sets explicitly reported), b) interventions lasted at least six weeks, c) participants had a minimum of one year of resistance training experience, d) participants’ age ranged from 18 to 35 years, e) studies reported direct measurements of muscle thickness and/or the cross-sectional area, and f) studies were published in peer-review journals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas just six were included in the quantitative analysis. All participants were divided into three groups: “low” (<12 weekly sets), “moderate” (12-20 weekly sets) and “high” volume (>20 weekly sets). According to the results of this meta-analysis, there were no differences between moderate and high training volume responses for the quadriceps (p = 0.19) and the biceps brachii (p = 0.59). However, it appears that a high training volume is better to induce muscle mass gains in the triceps brachii (p = 0.01). According to the results of this review, a range of 12-20 weekly sets per muscle group may be an optimum standard recommendation for increasing muscle hypertrophy in young, trained men. Sciendo 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8884877/ /pubmed/35291645 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017 Text en © 2022 Eneko Baz-Valle, Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Jordan Santos-Concejero, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Section III - Sports Training Baz-Valle, Eneko Balsalobre-Fernández, Carlos Alix-Fages, Carlos Santos-Concejero, Jordan A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title | A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title_full | A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title_short | A Systematic Review of The Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy |
title_sort | systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy |
topic | Section III - Sports Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291645 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bazvalleeneko asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT balsalobrefernandezcarlos asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT alixfagescarlos asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT santosconcejerojordan asystematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT bazvalleeneko systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT balsalobrefernandezcarlos systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT alixfagescarlos systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy AT santosconcejerojordan systematicreviewoftheeffectsofdifferentresistancetrainingvolumesonmusclehypertrophy |