Cargando…

Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis

Background  The success of sialendoscopy depends on several factors. The 2008 introduced lithiasis-stenosis-dilatation (LSD) classification intended to describe more precise the stone-duct system. We investigated whether the LSD classification and additional pre- and intraoperative parameters could...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giotakis, Aris I, Fischlechner, Rene, Dejaco, Daniel, Gottfried, Timo, Riechelmann, Herbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34058775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1510-9548
_version_ 1784660382744313856
author Giotakis, Aris I
Fischlechner, Rene
Dejaco, Daniel
Gottfried, Timo
Riechelmann, Herbert
author_facet Giotakis, Aris I
Fischlechner, Rene
Dejaco, Daniel
Gottfried, Timo
Riechelmann, Herbert
author_sort Giotakis, Aris I
collection PubMed
description Background  The success of sialendoscopy depends on several factors. The 2008 introduced lithiasis-stenosis-dilatation (LSD) classification intended to describe more precise the stone-duct system. We investigated whether the LSD classification and additional pre- and intraoperative parameters could be used as prognostic factors for success. Methods  We retrospectively assessed patients with primary sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis between September 2018 und March 2020. Among others, the outcome variables were the stone size, location and LSD classification. Results  We included 37 patients. The success group included 12/37 (32 %) patients. The median stone size was 3.7 millimeters (mm) in the success group and 10.0 mm in the failure group (Mann-Whitney test; p < 0.0001). In the success group, 11/12 stones were distal in contrast to the failure group (13/25 stones proximal; Pearson's chi-square test; p = 0.010). We noted 10 L1S0D0 stones in the success group in contrast to the failure group (15 L3aS0D0 stones; Pearson chi-square test; p = 0.001). For distal stones smaller than 5 mm, the success rate was 100 % and for proximal stones larger than 4 mm, it was 0 %. For stones free in the duct lumen (L1S0D0), the success rate was 60–100 %. Conclusion  The distal stone location and the smaller stone size in a normal duct should be beneficial prognostic factors for success. Future studies should focus on the LSD classification, stone volume, stone duct orientation and stone distance from the papilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8885298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88852982022-03-01 Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis Giotakis, Aris I Fischlechner, Rene Dejaco, Daniel Gottfried, Timo Riechelmann, Herbert Laryngorhinootologie Background  The success of sialendoscopy depends on several factors. The 2008 introduced lithiasis-stenosis-dilatation (LSD) classification intended to describe more precise the stone-duct system. We investigated whether the LSD classification and additional pre- and intraoperative parameters could be used as prognostic factors for success. Methods  We retrospectively assessed patients with primary sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis between September 2018 und March 2020. Among others, the outcome variables were the stone size, location and LSD classification. Results  We included 37 patients. The success group included 12/37 (32 %) patients. The median stone size was 3.7 millimeters (mm) in the success group and 10.0 mm in the failure group (Mann-Whitney test; p < 0.0001). In the success group, 11/12 stones were distal in contrast to the failure group (13/25 stones proximal; Pearson's chi-square test; p = 0.010). We noted 10 L1S0D0 stones in the success group in contrast to the failure group (15 L3aS0D0 stones; Pearson chi-square test; p = 0.001). For distal stones smaller than 5 mm, the success rate was 100 % and for proximal stones larger than 4 mm, it was 0 %. For stones free in the duct lumen (L1S0D0), the success rate was 60–100 %. Conclusion  The distal stone location and the smaller stone size in a normal duct should be beneficial prognostic factors for success. Future studies should focus on the LSD classification, stone volume, stone duct orientation and stone distance from the papilla. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8885298/ /pubmed/34058775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1510-9548 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Giotakis, Aris I
Fischlechner, Rene
Dejaco, Daniel
Gottfried, Timo
Riechelmann, Herbert
Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title_full Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title_fullStr Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title_short Prognostische Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg der Sialendoskopie bei Sialolithiasis
title_sort prognostische einflussfaktoren auf den erfolg der sialendoskopie bei sialolithiasis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34058775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1510-9548
work_keys_str_mv AT giotakisarisi prognostischeeinflussfaktorenaufdenerfolgdersialendoskopiebeisialolithiasis
AT fischlechnerrene prognostischeeinflussfaktorenaufdenerfolgdersialendoskopiebeisialolithiasis
AT dejacodaniel prognostischeeinflussfaktorenaufdenerfolgdersialendoskopiebeisialolithiasis
AT gottfriedtimo prognostischeeinflussfaktorenaufdenerfolgdersialendoskopiebeisialolithiasis
AT riechelmannherbert prognostischeeinflussfaktorenaufdenerfolgdersialendoskopiebeisialolithiasis