Cargando…
Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Tw...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Dental Association.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011 |
_version_ | 1784660421258510336 |
---|---|
author | Remington, Wayne David Ott, Brian Chandler Hartka, Thomas Ryan |
author_facet | Remington, Wayne David Ott, Brian Chandler Hartka, Thomas Ryan |
author_sort | Remington, Wayne David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Twenty-one dentists performed maxillary anterior incisor veneer preparations using a microscope and drape and loupes with or without a face shield. In each test condition, the following 3 levels of filtration were tested: no filtration, a high-volume evacuator [HVE], and an HVE with an extraoral suction device. Measurements were made using a mass monitor attached to the operator’s chest with inlet within 10 inches of the operator’s face. RESULTS: The authors found that the microscope and drape provided the lowest levels of aerosolized particles compared with loupes with or without a face shield (P < .001). There was no detectable difference in the concentration of particles between operators wearing a face shield and wearing loupes alone (P = .47). The particles in each test condition were lowered when an HVE was used (P < .001) and further lowered with an extraoral suction device. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the use of a surgical microscope and bag barrier drape, HVE, and extraoral suction device result in the lowest concentration of aerosolized particles. The face shield did not appear to offer any protection from aerosolized particles. HVE and extraoral suction were effective in decreasing aerosols regardless of the type of facial protection used. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can reduce exposure to aerosols with a drape, HVE, and extraoral suction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8885443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Dental Association. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88854432022-03-01 Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study Remington, Wayne David Ott, Brian Chandler Hartka, Thomas Ryan J Am Dent Assoc Investigation BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Twenty-one dentists performed maxillary anterior incisor veneer preparations using a microscope and drape and loupes with or without a face shield. In each test condition, the following 3 levels of filtration were tested: no filtration, a high-volume evacuator [HVE], and an HVE with an extraoral suction device. Measurements were made using a mass monitor attached to the operator’s chest with inlet within 10 inches of the operator’s face. RESULTS: The authors found that the microscope and drape provided the lowest levels of aerosolized particles compared with loupes with or without a face shield (P < .001). There was no detectable difference in the concentration of particles between operators wearing a face shield and wearing loupes alone (P = .47). The particles in each test condition were lowered when an HVE was used (P < .001) and further lowered with an extraoral suction device. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the use of a surgical microscope and bag barrier drape, HVE, and extraoral suction device result in the lowest concentration of aerosolized particles. The face shield did not appear to offer any protection from aerosolized particles. HVE and extraoral suction were effective in decreasing aerosols regardless of the type of facial protection used. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can reduce exposure to aerosols with a drape, HVE, and extraoral suction. American Dental Association. 2022-04 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8885443/ /pubmed/34952682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011 Text en © 2022 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Investigation Remington, Wayne David Ott, Brian Chandler Hartka, Thomas Ryan Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title | Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title_full | Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title_short | Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study |
title_sort | effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: a pilot study |
topic | Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT remingtonwaynedavid effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy AT ottbrianchandler effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy AT hartkathomasryan effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy |