Cargando…

Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Remington, Wayne David, Ott, Brian Chandler, Hartka, Thomas Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Dental Association. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011
_version_ 1784660421258510336
author Remington, Wayne David
Ott, Brian Chandler
Hartka, Thomas Ryan
author_facet Remington, Wayne David
Ott, Brian Chandler
Hartka, Thomas Ryan
author_sort Remington, Wayne David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Twenty-one dentists performed maxillary anterior incisor veneer preparations using a microscope and drape and loupes with or without a face shield. In each test condition, the following 3 levels of filtration were tested: no filtration, a high-volume evacuator [HVE], and an HVE with an extraoral suction device. Measurements were made using a mass monitor attached to the operator’s chest with inlet within 10 inches of the operator’s face. RESULTS: The authors found that the microscope and drape provided the lowest levels of aerosolized particles compared with loupes with or without a face shield (P < .001). There was no detectable difference in the concentration of particles between operators wearing a face shield and wearing loupes alone (P = .47). The particles in each test condition were lowered when an HVE was used (P < .001) and further lowered with an extraoral suction device. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the use of a surgical microscope and bag barrier drape, HVE, and extraoral suction device result in the lowest concentration of aerosolized particles. The face shield did not appear to offer any protection from aerosolized particles. HVE and extraoral suction were effective in decreasing aerosols regardless of the type of facial protection used. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can reduce exposure to aerosols with a drape, HVE, and extraoral suction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8885443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Dental Association.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88854432022-03-01 Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study Remington, Wayne David Ott, Brian Chandler Hartka, Thomas Ryan J Am Dent Assoc Investigation BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of minimizing exposure to aerosols generated during dental procedures. The authors’ objective was to measure the aerosolized particles in the breathing zone of operators using several facial protection and filtration methods. METHODS: Twenty-one dentists performed maxillary anterior incisor veneer preparations using a microscope and drape and loupes with or without a face shield. In each test condition, the following 3 levels of filtration were tested: no filtration, a high-volume evacuator [HVE], and an HVE with an extraoral suction device. Measurements were made using a mass monitor attached to the operator’s chest with inlet within 10 inches of the operator’s face. RESULTS: The authors found that the microscope and drape provided the lowest levels of aerosolized particles compared with loupes with or without a face shield (P < .001). There was no detectable difference in the concentration of particles between operators wearing a face shield and wearing loupes alone (P = .47). The particles in each test condition were lowered when an HVE was used (P < .001) and further lowered with an extraoral suction device. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the use of a surgical microscope and bag barrier drape, HVE, and extraoral suction device result in the lowest concentration of aerosolized particles. The face shield did not appear to offer any protection from aerosolized particles. HVE and extraoral suction were effective in decreasing aerosols regardless of the type of facial protection used. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can reduce exposure to aerosols with a drape, HVE, and extraoral suction. American Dental Association. 2022-04 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8885443/ /pubmed/34952682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011 Text en © 2022 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Investigation
Remington, Wayne David
Ott, Brian Chandler
Hartka, Thomas Ryan
Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title_full Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title_short Effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: A pilot study
title_sort effectiveness of barrier devices, high-volume evacuators, and extraoral suction devices on reducing dental aerosols for the dental operator: a pilot study
topic Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.011
work_keys_str_mv AT remingtonwaynedavid effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy
AT ottbrianchandler effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy
AT hartkathomasryan effectivenessofbarrierdeviceshighvolumeevacuatorsandextraoralsuctiondevicesonreducingdentalaerosolsforthedentaloperatorapilotstudy