Cargando…
Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as a good transition from open to complete minimally invasive approach especially in complex surgical procedures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodene...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06372-1 |
_version_ | 1784660430717714432 |
---|---|
author | Vladimirov, Miljana Bausch, Dirk Stein, Hubert J. Keck, Tobias Wellner, Ulrich |
author_facet | Vladimirov, Miljana Bausch, Dirk Stein, Hubert J. Keck, Tobias Wellner, Ulrich |
author_sort | Vladimirov, Miljana |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as a good transition from open to complete minimally invasive approach especially in complex surgical procedures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A broad search strategy with terms “laparoscopy” and “pancreatoduodenectomy” was used. Included studies were analyzed by quantitative meta-analysis using the metafor package for R software. RESULTS: Of 655 identified articles, 627 were excluded and 28 articles fully assessed, including 14 comparative studies, 8 case series and 6 case reports. Extracted data included intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome parameters. The predefined inclusion criteria were met by 14 comparative studies, and 371 patients were pooled in the meta-analysis. Hybrid laparoscopic pacreatoduodenectomy was associated with significantly longer operative time (I(2) 0%, p = 0,01, Mean HPD 494,6 min, Mean OPD 421,6 min, WMD 67 min, 95% CI 14–120 min). For all other postoperative outcome parameters, no statistically significant differences were found. A nonsignificant reduction in intraoperative transfusion rate (I(2) 20%, p = 0,2, proportion HPD 2%, proportion OPD 1,6%, OR 0,44, 95% CI 0,16–1,27) and blood loss (I(2) 95%, p = 0,1, Mean HPD 397,2 ml, Mean OPD 1017,8 ml, MD − 601 ml, 95% CI − 1311–108) was observed for hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in comparison to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates significantly increased operation time for hybrid laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy. Intraoperative variables as well as postoperative parameters and major morbidity were comparable for both techniques. Overall results of this meta-analysis demonstrated the hybrid technique as a safe procedure in high-volume centers offering aspects of a safe transition to fully laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06372-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8885482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88854822022-03-02 Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis Vladimirov, Miljana Bausch, Dirk Stein, Hubert J. Keck, Tobias Wellner, Ulrich World J Surg Scientific Review INTRODUCTION: Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as a good transition from open to complete minimally invasive approach especially in complex surgical procedures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A broad search strategy with terms “laparoscopy” and “pancreatoduodenectomy” was used. Included studies were analyzed by quantitative meta-analysis using the metafor package for R software. RESULTS: Of 655 identified articles, 627 were excluded and 28 articles fully assessed, including 14 comparative studies, 8 case series and 6 case reports. Extracted data included intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome parameters. The predefined inclusion criteria were met by 14 comparative studies, and 371 patients were pooled in the meta-analysis. Hybrid laparoscopic pacreatoduodenectomy was associated with significantly longer operative time (I(2) 0%, p = 0,01, Mean HPD 494,6 min, Mean OPD 421,6 min, WMD 67 min, 95% CI 14–120 min). For all other postoperative outcome parameters, no statistically significant differences were found. A nonsignificant reduction in intraoperative transfusion rate (I(2) 20%, p = 0,2, proportion HPD 2%, proportion OPD 1,6%, OR 0,44, 95% CI 0,16–1,27) and blood loss (I(2) 95%, p = 0,1, Mean HPD 397,2 ml, Mean OPD 1017,8 ml, MD − 601 ml, 95% CI − 1311–108) was observed for hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in comparison to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates significantly increased operation time for hybrid laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy. Intraoperative variables as well as postoperative parameters and major morbidity were comparable for both techniques. Overall results of this meta-analysis demonstrated the hybrid technique as a safe procedure in high-volume centers offering aspects of a safe transition to fully laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06372-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8885482/ /pubmed/35043246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06372-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Scientific Review Vladimirov, Miljana Bausch, Dirk Stein, Hubert J. Keck, Tobias Wellner, Ulrich Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title | Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | hybrid laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. a meta-analysis |
topic | Scientific Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06372-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vladimirovmiljana hybridlaparoscopicversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyametaanalysis AT bauschdirk hybridlaparoscopicversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyametaanalysis AT steinhubertj hybridlaparoscopicversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyametaanalysis AT kecktobias hybridlaparoscopicversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyametaanalysis AT wellnerulrich hybridlaparoscopicversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyametaanalysis |