Cargando…
Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative course of elderly patients (≥70 years) submitted to minimally invasive (MIDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and to evaluate if the modified Frailty Index (mFI) predicts the surgical course of elderly patients submitted to DP. METHODS: Data of patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2 |
_version_ | 1784660450127904768 |
---|---|
author | Paiella, Salvatore De Pastena, Matteo Esposito, Alessandro Secchettin, Erica Casetti, Luca Malleo, Giuseppe Montagnini, Greta Bannone, Elisa Deiro, Giacomo Bampa, Beatrice Ramera, Marco Landoni, Luca Balduzzi, Alberto Bassi, Claudio Salvia, Roberto |
author_facet | Paiella, Salvatore De Pastena, Matteo Esposito, Alessandro Secchettin, Erica Casetti, Luca Malleo, Giuseppe Montagnini, Greta Bannone, Elisa Deiro, Giacomo Bampa, Beatrice Ramera, Marco Landoni, Luca Balduzzi, Alberto Bassi, Claudio Salvia, Roberto |
author_sort | Paiella, Salvatore |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative course of elderly patients (≥70 years) submitted to minimally invasive (MIDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and to evaluate if the modified Frailty Index (mFI) predicts the surgical course of elderly patients submitted to DP. METHODS: Data of patients aged ≥70 who underwent DP at a single institution between March 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. A 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. Then, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups (MIDP vs. ODP). Additionally, the entire cohort of DP elderly patients was stratified according to the mFI into three groups: non-frail (mFI = 0), mildly frail (mFI = 1/2), or severely frail (mFI = 3) and then compared. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were analyzed. After PSM, 40 MIDP and 80 ODP patients were identified. The complications considered stratified homogenously between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences. The severity of the postoperative course increased as mFI did among the three groups regarding any complication (p = 0.022), abdominal collection (p = 0.014), pulmonary complication (p = 0.001), postoperative confusion (p = 0.047), Clavien-Dindo severity ≥3 events (p = 0.036), and length of stay (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients can be safely submitted to MIDP. The mFI identifies frail elderly patients more prone to develop surgical and non-surgical complications after DP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8885554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88855542022-03-02 Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Paiella, Salvatore De Pastena, Matteo Esposito, Alessandro Secchettin, Erica Casetti, Luca Malleo, Giuseppe Montagnini, Greta Bannone, Elisa Deiro, Giacomo Bampa, Beatrice Ramera, Marco Landoni, Luca Balduzzi, Alberto Bassi, Claudio Salvia, Roberto World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative course of elderly patients (≥70 years) submitted to minimally invasive (MIDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and to evaluate if the modified Frailty Index (mFI) predicts the surgical course of elderly patients submitted to DP. METHODS: Data of patients aged ≥70 who underwent DP at a single institution between March 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. A 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. Then, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups (MIDP vs. ODP). Additionally, the entire cohort of DP elderly patients was stratified according to the mFI into three groups: non-frail (mFI = 0), mildly frail (mFI = 1/2), or severely frail (mFI = 3) and then compared. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were analyzed. After PSM, 40 MIDP and 80 ODP patients were identified. The complications considered stratified homogenously between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences. The severity of the postoperative course increased as mFI did among the three groups regarding any complication (p = 0.022), abdominal collection (p = 0.014), pulmonary complication (p = 0.001), postoperative confusion (p = 0.047), Clavien-Dindo severity ≥3 events (p = 0.036), and length of stay (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients can be safely submitted to MIDP. The mFI identifies frail elderly patients more prone to develop surgical and non-surgical complications after DP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8885554/ /pubmed/35024923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Report Paiella, Salvatore De Pastena, Matteo Esposito, Alessandro Secchettin, Erica Casetti, Luca Malleo, Giuseppe Montagnini, Greta Bannone, Elisa Deiro, Giacomo Bampa, Beatrice Ramera, Marco Landoni, Luca Balduzzi, Alberto Bassi, Claudio Salvia, Roberto Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title | Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full | Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_short | Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_sort | modified frailty index to assess risk in elderly patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study |
topic | Original Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paiellasalvatore modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT depastenamatteo modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT espositoalessandro modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT secchettinerica modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT casettiluca modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT malleogiuseppe modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT montagninigreta modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT bannoneelisa modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT deirogiacomo modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT bampabeatrice modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT rameramarco modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT landoniluca modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT balduzzialberto modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT bassiclaudio modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT salviaroberto modifiedfrailtyindextoassessriskinelderlypatientsundergoingdistalpancreatectomyaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy |