Cargando…

The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study

We examined the effect of prostaglandin (PG) E(2) on the secretory function of equine corpus luteum (CL), according to the application site: intra-CL injection vs. an intrauterine (intra-U) administration. Moreover, the effect of intra-CL injection vs. intra-U administration of both luteotropic fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K., Jonczyk, Agnieszka W., Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Anna Z., Żebrowska, Ewelina, Ferreira-Dias, Graca, Skarzynski, Dariusz J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.753796
_version_ 1784660460044288000
author Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K.
Jonczyk, Agnieszka W.
Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Anna Z.
Żebrowska, Ewelina
Ferreira-Dias, Graca
Skarzynski, Dariusz J.
author_facet Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K.
Jonczyk, Agnieszka W.
Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Anna Z.
Żebrowska, Ewelina
Ferreira-Dias, Graca
Skarzynski, Dariusz J.
author_sort Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K.
collection PubMed
description We examined the effect of prostaglandin (PG) E(2) on the secretory function of equine corpus luteum (CL), according to the application site: intra-CL injection vs. an intrauterine (intra-U) administration. Moreover, the effect of intra-CL injection vs. intra-U administration of both luteotropic factors: PGE(2) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a positive control, on CL function was additionally compared. Mares were assigned to the groups (n = 6 per group): (1) an intra-CL saline injection (control); (2) an intra-CL injection of PGE(2) (5 mg/ml); (3) an intra-CL injection of hCG (1,500 IU/ml); (4) an intra-U saline administration (control); (5) an intra-U administration of PGE(2) (5 mg/5 ml); (6) an intra-U administration of hCG (1,500 IU/5 ml). Progesterone (P(4)) and PGE(2) concentrations were measured in blood plasma samples collected at −2, −1, and 0 (pre-treatment), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after treatments. Moreover, effects of different doses of PGE(2) application on the concentration of total PGF(2α) (PGF(2α) and its main metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2α)– PGFM) was determined. The time point of PGE(2), hCG, or saline administration was defined as hour “0” of the experiment. An intra-CL injection of PGE(2) increased P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations between 3 and 4 h or at 3 and 12 h, respectively (p < 0.05). While intra-U administration of PGE(2) elevated P(4) concentrations between 8 and 24 h, PGE(2) was upregulated at 1 h and between 3 and 4 h (p < 0.05). An intra-CL injection of hCG increased P(4) concentrations at 1, 6, and 12 h (p < 0.05), while its intra-U administration enhanced P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations between 1 and 12 h or at 3 h and between 6 and 10 h, respectively (p < 0.05). An application of PGE(2), dependently on the dose, supports equine CL function, regardless of the application site, consequently leading to differences in both P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations in blood plasma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8885592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88855922022-03-02 The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K. Jonczyk, Agnieszka W. Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Anna Z. Żebrowska, Ewelina Ferreira-Dias, Graca Skarzynski, Dariusz J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science We examined the effect of prostaglandin (PG) E(2) on the secretory function of equine corpus luteum (CL), according to the application site: intra-CL injection vs. an intrauterine (intra-U) administration. Moreover, the effect of intra-CL injection vs. intra-U administration of both luteotropic factors: PGE(2) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a positive control, on CL function was additionally compared. Mares were assigned to the groups (n = 6 per group): (1) an intra-CL saline injection (control); (2) an intra-CL injection of PGE(2) (5 mg/ml); (3) an intra-CL injection of hCG (1,500 IU/ml); (4) an intra-U saline administration (control); (5) an intra-U administration of PGE(2) (5 mg/5 ml); (6) an intra-U administration of hCG (1,500 IU/5 ml). Progesterone (P(4)) and PGE(2) concentrations were measured in blood plasma samples collected at −2, −1, and 0 (pre-treatment), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after treatments. Moreover, effects of different doses of PGE(2) application on the concentration of total PGF(2α) (PGF(2α) and its main metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2α)– PGFM) was determined. The time point of PGE(2), hCG, or saline administration was defined as hour “0” of the experiment. An intra-CL injection of PGE(2) increased P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations between 3 and 4 h or at 3 and 12 h, respectively (p < 0.05). While intra-U administration of PGE(2) elevated P(4) concentrations between 8 and 24 h, PGE(2) was upregulated at 1 h and between 3 and 4 h (p < 0.05). An intra-CL injection of hCG increased P(4) concentrations at 1, 6, and 12 h (p < 0.05), while its intra-U administration enhanced P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations between 1 and 12 h or at 3 h and between 6 and 10 h, respectively (p < 0.05). An application of PGE(2), dependently on the dose, supports equine CL function, regardless of the application site, consequently leading to differences in both P(4) and PGE(2) concentrations in blood plasma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8885592/ /pubmed/35242830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.753796 Text en Copyright © 2022 Piotrowska-Tomala, Jonczyk, Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Żebrowska, Ferreira-Dias and Skarzynski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Piotrowska-Tomala, Katarzyna K.
Jonczyk, Agnieszka W.
Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Anna Z.
Żebrowska, Ewelina
Ferreira-Dias, Graca
Skarzynski, Dariusz J.
The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title_full The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title_fullStr The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title_short The Effects of Prostaglandin E(2) Treatment on the Secretory Function of Mare Corpus Luteum Depends on the Site of Application: An in vivo Study
title_sort effects of prostaglandin e(2) treatment on the secretory function of mare corpus luteum depends on the site of application: an in vivo study
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.753796
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrowskatomalakatarzynak theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT jonczykagnieszkaw theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT szostekmioduchowskaannaz theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT zebrowskaewelina theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT ferreiradiasgraca theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT skarzynskidariuszj theeffectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT piotrowskatomalakatarzynak effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT jonczykagnieszkaw effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT szostekmioduchowskaannaz effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT zebrowskaewelina effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT ferreiradiasgraca effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy
AT skarzynskidariuszj effectsofprostaglandine2treatmentonthesecretoryfunctionofmarecorpusluteumdependsonthesiteofapplicationaninvivostudy