Cargando…

Positron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer: Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose painting by numbers (DPBN) require a high degree of dose modulation to fulfill the image-based voxel wise dose prescription. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric accuracy of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography((18)F-FDG-PET)-based DPBN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papoutsis, Iosif, Skjei Knudtsen, Ingerid, Peter Skaug Sande, Erlend, Louni Rekstad, Bernt, Öllers, Michel, van Elmpt, Wouter, Røthe Arnesen, Marius, Malinen, Eirik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.013
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose painting by numbers (DPBN) require a high degree of dose modulation to fulfill the image-based voxel wise dose prescription. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric accuracy of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography((18)F-FDG-PET)-based DPBN in an anthropomorphic lung phantom using alanine dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A linear dose prescription based on (18)F-FDG-PET image intensities within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of a lung cancer patient was employed. One DPBN scheme with low dose modulation (Scheme A; minimum/maximum fraction dose to the GTV 2.92/4.26 Gy) and one with a high modulation (Scheme B; 2.81/4.52 Gy) were generated. The plans were transferred to a computed tomograpy (CT) scan of a thorax phantom based on CT images of the patient. Using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), DPBN was delivered to the phantom with embedded alanine dosimeters. A plan was also delivered to an intentionally misaligned phantom. Absorbed doses at various points in the phantom were measured by alanine dosimetry. RESULTS: A pointwise comparison between GTV doses from prescription, treatment plan calculation and VMAT delivery showed high correspondence, with a mean and maximum dose difference of <0.1 Gy and 0.3 Gy, respectively. No difference was found in dosimetric accuracy between scheme A and B. The misalignment caused deviations up to 1 Gy between prescription and delivery. CONCLUSION: DPBN can be delivered with high accuracy, showing that the treatment may be applied correctly from a dosimetric perspective. Still, misalignment may cause considerable dosimetric erros, indicating the need for patient immobilization and monitoring.