Cargando…

Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines

Omics-based tools were coupled with bioinformatics for a systeomics analysis of two biopharma cell types: Chinese hamster ovary (M-CHO and CHO-K1) and SP2/0. Exponential and stationary phase samples revealed more than 10,000 transcripts and 6000 proteins across these two manufacturing cell lines. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demirhan, Deniz, Kumar, Amit, Zhu, Jie, Poulsen, Pi Camilla, Majewska, Natalia I., Sebastian, Yinong, Chaerkady, Raghothama, Yu, Wen, Zhu, Wei, Zhuang, Li, Shah, Punit, Lekstrom, Kristen, Cole, Robert N., Zhang, Hui, Betenbaugh, Michael J., Bowen, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06886-1
_version_ 1784660479601278976
author Demirhan, Deniz
Kumar, Amit
Zhu, Jie
Poulsen, Pi Camilla
Majewska, Natalia I.
Sebastian, Yinong
Chaerkady, Raghothama
Yu, Wen
Zhu, Wei
Zhuang, Li
Shah, Punit
Lekstrom, Kristen
Cole, Robert N.
Zhang, Hui
Betenbaugh, Michael J.
Bowen, Michael A.
author_facet Demirhan, Deniz
Kumar, Amit
Zhu, Jie
Poulsen, Pi Camilla
Majewska, Natalia I.
Sebastian, Yinong
Chaerkady, Raghothama
Yu, Wen
Zhu, Wei
Zhuang, Li
Shah, Punit
Lekstrom, Kristen
Cole, Robert N.
Zhang, Hui
Betenbaugh, Michael J.
Bowen, Michael A.
author_sort Demirhan, Deniz
collection PubMed
description Omics-based tools were coupled with bioinformatics for a systeomics analysis of two biopharma cell types: Chinese hamster ovary (M-CHO and CHO-K1) and SP2/0. Exponential and stationary phase samples revealed more than 10,000 transcripts and 6000 proteins across these two manufacturing cell lines. A statistical comparison of transcriptomics and proteomics data identified downregulated genes involved in protein folding, protein synthesis and protein metabolism, including PPIA-cyclophilin A, HSPD1, and EIF3K, in M-CHO compared to SP2/0 while cell cycle and actin cytoskeleton genes were reduced in SP2/0. KEGG pathway comparisons revealed glycerolipids, glycosphingolipids, ABC transporters, calcium signaling, cell adhesion, and secretion pathways depleted in M-CHO while retinol metabolism was upregulated. KEGG and IPA also indicated apoptosis, RNA degradation, and proteosomes enriched in CHO stationary phase. Alternatively, gene ontology analysis revealed an underrepresentation in ion and potassium channel activities, membrane proteins, and secretory granules including Stxbpt2, Syt1, Syt9, and Cma1 proteins in M-CHO. Additional enrichment strategies involving ultracentrifugation, biotinylation, and hydrazide chemistry identified over 4000 potential CHO membrane and secretory proteins, yet many secretory and membrane proteins were still depleted. This systeomics pipeline has revealed bottlenecks and potential opportunities for cell line engineering in CHO and SP2/0 to improve their production capabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8885639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88856392022-03-01 Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines Demirhan, Deniz Kumar, Amit Zhu, Jie Poulsen, Pi Camilla Majewska, Natalia I. Sebastian, Yinong Chaerkady, Raghothama Yu, Wen Zhu, Wei Zhuang, Li Shah, Punit Lekstrom, Kristen Cole, Robert N. Zhang, Hui Betenbaugh, Michael J. Bowen, Michael A. Sci Rep Article Omics-based tools were coupled with bioinformatics for a systeomics analysis of two biopharma cell types: Chinese hamster ovary (M-CHO and CHO-K1) and SP2/0. Exponential and stationary phase samples revealed more than 10,000 transcripts and 6000 proteins across these two manufacturing cell lines. A statistical comparison of transcriptomics and proteomics data identified downregulated genes involved in protein folding, protein synthesis and protein metabolism, including PPIA-cyclophilin A, HSPD1, and EIF3K, in M-CHO compared to SP2/0 while cell cycle and actin cytoskeleton genes were reduced in SP2/0. KEGG pathway comparisons revealed glycerolipids, glycosphingolipids, ABC transporters, calcium signaling, cell adhesion, and secretion pathways depleted in M-CHO while retinol metabolism was upregulated. KEGG and IPA also indicated apoptosis, RNA degradation, and proteosomes enriched in CHO stationary phase. Alternatively, gene ontology analysis revealed an underrepresentation in ion and potassium channel activities, membrane proteins, and secretory granules including Stxbpt2, Syt1, Syt9, and Cma1 proteins in M-CHO. Additional enrichment strategies involving ultracentrifugation, biotinylation, and hydrazide chemistry identified over 4000 potential CHO membrane and secretory proteins, yet many secretory and membrane proteins were still depleted. This systeomics pipeline has revealed bottlenecks and potential opportunities for cell line engineering in CHO and SP2/0 to improve their production capabilities. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8885639/ /pubmed/35228567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06886-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Demirhan, Deniz
Kumar, Amit
Zhu, Jie
Poulsen, Pi Camilla
Majewska, Natalia I.
Sebastian, Yinong
Chaerkady, Raghothama
Yu, Wen
Zhu, Wei
Zhuang, Li
Shah, Punit
Lekstrom, Kristen
Cole, Robert N.
Zhang, Hui
Betenbaugh, Michael J.
Bowen, Michael A.
Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title_full Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title_fullStr Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title_full_unstemmed Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title_short Comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between CHO and SP2/0 cell lines
title_sort comparative systeomics to elucidate physiological differences between cho and sp2/0 cell lines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06886-1
work_keys_str_mv AT demirhandeniz comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT kumaramit comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT zhujie comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT poulsenpicamilla comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT majewskanataliai comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT sebastianyinong comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT chaerkadyraghothama comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT yuwen comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT zhuwei comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT zhuangli comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT shahpunit comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT lekstromkristen comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT colerobertn comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT zhanghui comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT betenbaughmichaelj comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines
AT bowenmichaela comparativesysteomicstoelucidatephysiologicaldifferencesbetweenchoandsp20celllines