Cargando…

Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone dosage allows real-time monitoring of the decrease in PTH levels during parathyroidectomy and verify procedure’s efficacy. Currently, none of the interpretative criteria used has absolute accuracy. The aim of this study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the Rom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graceffa, Giuseppa, Cipolla, Calogero, Calagna, Silvia, Contino, Silvia, Melfa, Giuseppina, Orlando, Giuseppina, Antonini, Riccardo, Corigliano, Alessandro, Proclamà, Maria Pia, Mazzola, Sergio, Cocorullo, Gianfranco, Scerrino, Gregorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07380-4
_version_ 1784660500666122240
author Graceffa, Giuseppa
Cipolla, Calogero
Calagna, Silvia
Contino, Silvia
Melfa, Giuseppina
Orlando, Giuseppina
Antonini, Riccardo
Corigliano, Alessandro
Proclamà, Maria Pia
Mazzola, Sergio
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Scerrino, Gregorio
author_facet Graceffa, Giuseppa
Cipolla, Calogero
Calagna, Silvia
Contino, Silvia
Melfa, Giuseppina
Orlando, Giuseppina
Antonini, Riccardo
Corigliano, Alessandro
Proclamà, Maria Pia
Mazzola, Sergio
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Scerrino, Gregorio
author_sort Graceffa, Giuseppa
collection PubMed
description Intraoperative parathyroid hormone dosage allows real-time monitoring of the decrease in PTH levels during parathyroidectomy and verify procedure’s efficacy. Currently, none of the interpretative criteria used has absolute accuracy. The aim of this study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the Rome criterion verifying diagnostic significance of the individual assays. A total of 205 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism from a single adenoma were retrospectively evaluated and monitored with baseline PTH, PTH at 10 min and PTH at 20 min after adenoma excision. The accuracy of the latter two assays compared with baseline was compared by ROC curves. In addition, was evaluated the influence on these data of localization diagnostics (ultrasounds and scintigraphy), definitive histology, and type of surgery performed. The ratio of 20-min sampling to baseline in the Rome criterion showed highest diagnostic significance. This finding was not influenced by the type of surgery performed, definitive histologic examination, or intraoperative localization of the adenoma. The Rome criterion has shown its high reliability in detecting persistence. The ratio of sampling at 20 min to baseline is by far the best performing. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sampling at 10 min after adenoma excision can be considered not mandatory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8885714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88857142022-03-01 Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism Graceffa, Giuseppa Cipolla, Calogero Calagna, Silvia Contino, Silvia Melfa, Giuseppina Orlando, Giuseppina Antonini, Riccardo Corigliano, Alessandro Proclamà, Maria Pia Mazzola, Sergio Cocorullo, Gianfranco Scerrino, Gregorio Sci Rep Article Intraoperative parathyroid hormone dosage allows real-time monitoring of the decrease in PTH levels during parathyroidectomy and verify procedure’s efficacy. Currently, none of the interpretative criteria used has absolute accuracy. The aim of this study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the Rome criterion verifying diagnostic significance of the individual assays. A total of 205 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism from a single adenoma were retrospectively evaluated and monitored with baseline PTH, PTH at 10 min and PTH at 20 min after adenoma excision. The accuracy of the latter two assays compared with baseline was compared by ROC curves. In addition, was evaluated the influence on these data of localization diagnostics (ultrasounds and scintigraphy), definitive histology, and type of surgery performed. The ratio of 20-min sampling to baseline in the Rome criterion showed highest diagnostic significance. This finding was not influenced by the type of surgery performed, definitive histologic examination, or intraoperative localization of the adenoma. The Rome criterion has shown its high reliability in detecting persistence. The ratio of sampling at 20 min to baseline is by far the best performing. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sampling at 10 min after adenoma excision can be considered not mandatory. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8885714/ /pubmed/35228624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07380-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Graceffa, Giuseppa
Cipolla, Calogero
Calagna, Silvia
Contino, Silvia
Melfa, Giuseppina
Orlando, Giuseppina
Antonini, Riccardo
Corigliano, Alessandro
Proclamà, Maria Pia
Mazzola, Sergio
Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Scerrino, Gregorio
Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title_full Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title_fullStr Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title_short Interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the Rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
title_sort interpretation of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring according to the rome criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07380-4
work_keys_str_mv AT graceffagiuseppa interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT cipollacalogero interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT calagnasilvia interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT continosilvia interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT melfagiuseppina interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT orlandogiuseppina interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT antoniniriccardo interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT coriglianoalessandro interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT proclamamariapia interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT mazzolasergio interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT cocorullogianfranco interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism
AT scerrinogregorio interpretationofintraoperativeparathyroidhormonemonitoringaccordingtotheromecriterioninprimaryhyperparathyroidism