Cargando…
Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States
Spatial aggregates of survey and web search data make it possible to identify the heterogeneous well-being effects of social media platforms. This study reports evidence from different sources of longitudinal data that suggests that the well-being effects of social media differ across platforms and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y |
_version_ | 1784660530318802944 |
---|---|
author | Jaidka, Kokil |
author_facet | Jaidka, Kokil |
author_sort | Jaidka, Kokil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial aggregates of survey and web search data make it possible to identify the heterogeneous well-being effects of social media platforms. This study reports evidence from different sources of longitudinal data that suggests that the well-being effects of social media differ across platforms and population groups. The well-being effects of frequent social media visits are consistently positive for Facebook but negative for Instagram. Group-level analyses suggest that the positive well-being effects are experienced mainly by white, high-income populations at both the individual and the county level, while the adverse effects of Instagram use are observed on younger and Black populations. The findings are corroborated when geocoded web search data from Google is used and when self-reports from surveys are used in place of region-level aggregates. Greater Instagram use in regions is also linked to higher depression diagnoses across most sociodemographic groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8885821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88858212022-03-01 Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States Jaidka, Kokil Sci Rep Article Spatial aggregates of survey and web search data make it possible to identify the heterogeneous well-being effects of social media platforms. This study reports evidence from different sources of longitudinal data that suggests that the well-being effects of social media differ across platforms and population groups. The well-being effects of frequent social media visits are consistently positive for Facebook but negative for Instagram. Group-level analyses suggest that the positive well-being effects are experienced mainly by white, high-income populations at both the individual and the county level, while the adverse effects of Instagram use are observed on younger and Black populations. The findings are corroborated when geocoded web search data from Google is used and when self-reports from surveys are used in place of region-level aggregates. Greater Instagram use in regions is also linked to higher depression diagnoses across most sociodemographic groups. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8885821/ /pubmed/35228639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jaidka, Kokil Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title | Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title_full | Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title_fullStr | Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title_short | Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States |
title_sort | cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of twitter, instagram, and facebook in the united states |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8885821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaidkakokil crossplatformandsubgroupdifferencesinthewellbeingeffectsoftwitterinstagramandfacebookintheunitedstates |