Cargando…
Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dyn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508 |
_version_ | 1784660601216172032 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Che-Yu Chou, Chia-Ching Chen, Lan-Rong Wu, Wei-Ting Hsu, Po-Cheng Yang, Tung-Han Chang, Ke-Vin |
author_facet | Lin, Che-Yu Chou, Chia-Ching Chen, Lan-Rong Wu, Wei-Ting Hsu, Po-Cheng Yang, Tung-Han Chang, Ke-Vin |
author_sort | Lin, Che-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dynamic ultrasound and to examine their reliability and potential influencing factors. Method: We included 48 healthy volunteers and examined their subacromial motions with dynamic ultrasound imaging. The parameters were the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, rotation radius, and degrees of the humeral head. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the impact of different shoulder laterality, postures, and motion phases on the outcome. Result: Using the data of the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities (intra-class correlation coefficient) were determined as 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. In the GEE analysis, a decrease in the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance was associated with the abduction phase and full-can posture, with a beta coefficient of −0.02 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.03 to −0.01] and −0.07 cm (95% CI, −0.11 to −0.02), respectively. The abduction phase led to a decrease in the radius of humeral rotation and an increase in the angle of humeral rotation, with a beta coefficient of −1.28 cm (95% CI, −2.16 to −0.40) and 6.60° (95% CI, 3.54–9.67), respectively. A significant negative correlation was observed between the rotation angle and radius of the humeral head and between the rotation angle and the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of dynamic ultrasound imaging enables the delineation of subacromial motion with good reliability. The vertical acromiohumeral distance is the lowest in the abduction phase and full-can posture, and the rotation angle of the humeral head has the potential to serve as a new parameter for the evaluation of SIS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8886165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88861652022-03-02 Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors Lin, Che-Yu Chou, Chia-Ching Chen, Lan-Rong Wu, Wei-Ting Hsu, Po-Cheng Yang, Tung-Han Chang, Ke-Vin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dynamic ultrasound and to examine their reliability and potential influencing factors. Method: We included 48 healthy volunteers and examined their subacromial motions with dynamic ultrasound imaging. The parameters were the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, rotation radius, and degrees of the humeral head. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the impact of different shoulder laterality, postures, and motion phases on the outcome. Result: Using the data of the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities (intra-class correlation coefficient) were determined as 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. In the GEE analysis, a decrease in the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance was associated with the abduction phase and full-can posture, with a beta coefficient of −0.02 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.03 to −0.01] and −0.07 cm (95% CI, −0.11 to −0.02), respectively. The abduction phase led to a decrease in the radius of humeral rotation and an increase in the angle of humeral rotation, with a beta coefficient of −1.28 cm (95% CI, −2.16 to −0.40) and 6.60° (95% CI, 3.54–9.67), respectively. A significant negative correlation was observed between the rotation angle and radius of the humeral head and between the rotation angle and the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of dynamic ultrasound imaging enables the delineation of subacromial motion with good reliability. The vertical acromiohumeral distance is the lowest in the abduction phase and full-can posture, and the rotation angle of the humeral head has the potential to serve as a new parameter for the evaluation of SIS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8886165/ /pubmed/35242751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Chou, Chen, Wu, Hsu, Yang and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Lin, Che-Yu Chou, Chia-Ching Chen, Lan-Rong Wu, Wei-Ting Hsu, Po-Cheng Yang, Tung-Han Chang, Ke-Vin Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title | Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title_full | Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title_short | Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors |
title_sort | quantitative analysis of dynamic subacromial ultrasonography: reliability and influencing factors |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lincheyu quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT chouchiaching quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT chenlanrong quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT wuweiting quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT hsupocheng quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT yangtunghan quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors AT changkevin quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors |