Cargando…

Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors

Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Che-Yu, Chou, Chia-Ching, Chen, Lan-Rong, Wu, Wei-Ting, Hsu, Po-Cheng, Yang, Tung-Han, Chang, Ke-Vin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508
_version_ 1784660601216172032
author Lin, Che-Yu
Chou, Chia-Ching
Chen, Lan-Rong
Wu, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Po-Cheng
Yang, Tung-Han
Chang, Ke-Vin
author_facet Lin, Che-Yu
Chou, Chia-Ching
Chen, Lan-Rong
Wu, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Po-Cheng
Yang, Tung-Han
Chang, Ke-Vin
author_sort Lin, Che-Yu
collection PubMed
description Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dynamic ultrasound and to examine their reliability and potential influencing factors. Method: We included 48 healthy volunteers and examined their subacromial motions with dynamic ultrasound imaging. The parameters were the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, rotation radius, and degrees of the humeral head. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the impact of different shoulder laterality, postures, and motion phases on the outcome. Result: Using the data of the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities (intra-class correlation coefficient) were determined as 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. In the GEE analysis, a decrease in the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance was associated with the abduction phase and full-can posture, with a beta coefficient of −0.02 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.03 to −0.01] and −0.07 cm (95% CI, −0.11 to −0.02), respectively. The abduction phase led to a decrease in the radius of humeral rotation and an increase in the angle of humeral rotation, with a beta coefficient of −1.28 cm (95% CI, −2.16 to −0.40) and 6.60° (95% CI, 3.54–9.67), respectively. A significant negative correlation was observed between the rotation angle and radius of the humeral head and between the rotation angle and the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of dynamic ultrasound imaging enables the delineation of subacromial motion with good reliability. The vertical acromiohumeral distance is the lowest in the abduction phase and full-can posture, and the rotation angle of the humeral head has the potential to serve as a new parameter for the evaluation of SIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8886165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88861652022-03-02 Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors Lin, Che-Yu Chou, Chia-Ching Chen, Lan-Rong Wu, Wei-Ting Hsu, Po-Cheng Yang, Tung-Han Chang, Ke-Vin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: Current imaging methods used to examine patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) are limited by their semi-quantitative nature and their capability of capturing dynamic movements. This study aimed to develop a quantitative analytic model to assess subacromial motions using dynamic ultrasound and to examine their reliability and potential influencing factors. Method: We included 48 healthy volunteers and examined their subacromial motions with dynamic ultrasound imaging. The parameters were the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, rotation radius, and degrees of the humeral head. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the impact of different shoulder laterality, postures, and motion phases on the outcome. Result: Using the data of the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities (intra-class correlation coefficient) were determined as 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. In the GEE analysis, a decrease in the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance was associated with the abduction phase and full-can posture, with a beta coefficient of −0.02 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.03 to −0.01] and −0.07 cm (95% CI, −0.11 to −0.02), respectively. The abduction phase led to a decrease in the radius of humeral rotation and an increase in the angle of humeral rotation, with a beta coefficient of −1.28 cm (95% CI, −2.16 to −0.40) and 6.60° (95% CI, 3.54–9.67), respectively. A significant negative correlation was observed between the rotation angle and radius of the humeral head and between the rotation angle and the minimal vertical acromiohumeral distance. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of dynamic ultrasound imaging enables the delineation of subacromial motion with good reliability. The vertical acromiohumeral distance is the lowest in the abduction phase and full-can posture, and the rotation angle of the humeral head has the potential to serve as a new parameter for the evaluation of SIS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8886165/ /pubmed/35242751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Chou, Chen, Wu, Hsu, Yang and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Lin, Che-Yu
Chou, Chia-Ching
Chen, Lan-Rong
Wu, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Po-Cheng
Yang, Tung-Han
Chang, Ke-Vin
Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title_full Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title_fullStr Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title_short Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors
title_sort quantitative analysis of dynamic subacromial ultrasonography: reliability and influencing factors
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830508
work_keys_str_mv AT lincheyu quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT chouchiaching quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT chenlanrong quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT wuweiting quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT hsupocheng quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT yangtunghan quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors
AT changkevin quantitativeanalysisofdynamicsubacromialultrasonographyreliabilityandinfluencingfactors