Cargando…
The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study
BACKGROUND: Remote home monitoring of people testing positive for COVID-19 using pulse oximetry was implemented across England during the Winter of 2020/21 to identify falling blood oxygen saturation levels at an early stage. This was hypothesised to enable earlier hospital admission, reduce the nee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101318 |
_version_ | 1784660604868362240 |
---|---|
author | Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Georghiou, Theo Morris, Steve Crellin, Nadia E. Litchfield, Ian Massou, Efthalia Sidhu, Manbinder S. Tomini, Sonila M. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Walton, Holly Fulop, Naomi J. |
author_facet | Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Georghiou, Theo Morris, Steve Crellin, Nadia E. Litchfield, Ian Massou, Efthalia Sidhu, Manbinder S. Tomini, Sonila M. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Walton, Holly Fulop, Naomi J. |
author_sort | Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Remote home monitoring of people testing positive for COVID-19 using pulse oximetry was implemented across England during the Winter of 2020/21 to identify falling blood oxygen saturation levels at an early stage. This was hypothesised to enable earlier hospital admission, reduce the need for intensive care and improve survival. This study is an evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the pre-hospital monitoring programme, COVID oximetry @home (CO@h). METHODS: The setting was all Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) areas in England where there were complete data on the number of people enrolled onto the programme between 2nd November 2020 and 21st February 2021. We analysed relationships at a geographical area level between the extent to which people aged 65 or over were enrolled onto the programme and outcomes over the period between November 2020 to February 2021. FINDINGS: For every 10% increase in coverage of the programme, mortality was reduced by 2% (95% confidence interval:4% reduction to 1% increase), admissions increased by 3% (-1% to 7%), in-hospital mortality fell by 3% (-8% to 3%) and lengths of stay increased by 1·8% (-1·2% to 4·9%). None of these results are statistically significant, although the confidence interval indicates that any adverse effect on mortality would be small, but a mortality reduction of up to 4% may have resulted from the programme. INTERPRETATION: There are several possible explanations for our findings. One is that CO@h did not have the hypothesised impact. Another is that the low rates of enrolment and incomplete data in many areas reduced the chances of detecting any impact that may have existed. Also, CO@h has been implemented in many different ways across the country and these may have had varying levels of effect. FUNDING: This is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research programme (RSET Project no. 16/138/17; BRACE Project no. 16/138/31) and NHSEI. NJF is an NIHR Senior Investigator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8886180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88861802022-03-01 The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Georghiou, Theo Morris, Steve Crellin, Nadia E. Litchfield, Ian Massou, Efthalia Sidhu, Manbinder S. Tomini, Sonila M. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Walton, Holly Fulop, Naomi J. eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Remote home monitoring of people testing positive for COVID-19 using pulse oximetry was implemented across England during the Winter of 2020/21 to identify falling blood oxygen saturation levels at an early stage. This was hypothesised to enable earlier hospital admission, reduce the need for intensive care and improve survival. This study is an evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the pre-hospital monitoring programme, COVID oximetry @home (CO@h). METHODS: The setting was all Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) areas in England where there were complete data on the number of people enrolled onto the programme between 2nd November 2020 and 21st February 2021. We analysed relationships at a geographical area level between the extent to which people aged 65 or over were enrolled onto the programme and outcomes over the period between November 2020 to February 2021. FINDINGS: For every 10% increase in coverage of the programme, mortality was reduced by 2% (95% confidence interval:4% reduction to 1% increase), admissions increased by 3% (-1% to 7%), in-hospital mortality fell by 3% (-8% to 3%) and lengths of stay increased by 1·8% (-1·2% to 4·9%). None of these results are statistically significant, although the confidence interval indicates that any adverse effect on mortality would be small, but a mortality reduction of up to 4% may have resulted from the programme. INTERPRETATION: There are several possible explanations for our findings. One is that CO@h did not have the hypothesised impact. Another is that the low rates of enrolment and incomplete data in many areas reduced the chances of detecting any impact that may have existed. Also, CO@h has been implemented in many different ways across the country and these may have had varying levels of effect. FUNDING: This is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research programme (RSET Project no. 16/138/17; BRACE Project no. 16/138/31) and NHSEI. NJF is an NIHR Senior Investigator. Elsevier 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8886180/ /pubmed/35252824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101318 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Georghiou, Theo Morris, Steve Crellin, Nadia E. Litchfield, Ian Massou, Efthalia Sidhu, Manbinder S. Tomini, Sonila M. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Walton, Holly Fulop, Naomi J. The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title | The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title_full | The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title_fullStr | The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title_short | The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study |
title_sort | impact of remote home monitoring of people with covid-19 using pulse oximetry: a national population and observational study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sherlawjohnsonchris theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT georghioutheo theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT morrissteve theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT crellinnadiae theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT litchfieldian theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT massouefthalia theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT sidhumanbinders theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT tominisonilam theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT vindrolapadroscecilia theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT waltonholly theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT fulopnaomij theimpactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT sherlawjohnsonchris impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT georghioutheo impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT morrissteve impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT crellinnadiae impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT litchfieldian impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT massouefthalia impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT sidhumanbinders impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT tominisonilam impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT vindrolapadroscecilia impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT waltonholly impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy AT fulopnaomij impactofremotehomemonitoringofpeoplewithcovid19usingpulseoximetryanationalpopulationandobservationalstudy |