Cargando…

PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Assess feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to measure clinical and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced recovery pathway for people with hip fracture and cognitive impairment (CI). DESIGN: Feasibility trial undertaken between 2016 and 2018. SETTING: Eleven acute hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cross, Jane L, Hammond, Simon P, Shepstone, Lee, Poland, Fiona, Henderson, Catherine, Backhouse, Tamara, Penhale, Bridget, Donell, Simon, Knapp, Martin, Lewins, Douglas, MacLullich, Alasdair, Patel, Martyn, Sahota, Opinder, Smith, Toby O, Waring, Justin, Howard, Robert, Ballard, Clive, Fox, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055267
_version_ 1784660657611735040
author Cross, Jane L
Hammond, Simon P
Shepstone, Lee
Poland, Fiona
Henderson, Catherine
Backhouse, Tamara
Penhale, Bridget
Donell, Simon
Knapp, Martin
Lewins, Douglas
MacLullich, Alasdair
Patel, Martyn
Sahota, Opinder
Smith, Toby O
Waring, Justin
Howard, Robert
Ballard, Clive
Fox, Chris
author_facet Cross, Jane L
Hammond, Simon P
Shepstone, Lee
Poland, Fiona
Henderson, Catherine
Backhouse, Tamara
Penhale, Bridget
Donell, Simon
Knapp, Martin
Lewins, Douglas
MacLullich, Alasdair
Patel, Martyn
Sahota, Opinder
Smith, Toby O
Waring, Justin
Howard, Robert
Ballard, Clive
Fox, Chris
author_sort Cross, Jane L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Assess feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to measure clinical and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced recovery pathway for people with hip fracture and cognitive impairment (CI). DESIGN: Feasibility trial undertaken between 2016 and 2018. SETTING: Eleven acute hospitals from three UK regions. PARTICIPANTS: 284 participants (208 female:69 male). Inclusion criteria: aged >60 years, confirmed proximal hip fracture requiring surgical fixation and CI; preoperative AMTS ≤8 in England or a 4AT score ≥1 in Scotland; minimum of 5 days on study ward; a ‘suitable informant’ able to provide proxy measures, recruited within 7 days of hip fracture surgery. Exclusion criteria: no hip surgery; not expected to survive beyond 4 weeks; already enrolled in a clinical trial. INTERVENTION: PERFECT-ER, an enhanced recovery pathway with 15 quality targets supported by a checklist and manual, a service improvement lead a process lead and implemented using a plan–do–study–act model. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes: recruitment and attrition, intervention acceptability, completion of participant reported outcome measures, preliminary estimates of potential effectiveness using mortality, EQ-5D-5L, economic and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: 282 participants were consented and recruited (132, intervention) from a target of 400. Mean recruitment rates were the same in intervention and control sites, (range: 1.2 and 2.7 participants/month). Retention was 230 (86%) at 1 month and 54%(144) at 6 months. At 3 months a relatively small effect (one quarter of an SD) was observed on health-related quality of life of the patient measured with EQ-5D-5L proxy in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: This trial design was feasible with modifications to recruitment. Mechanisms for delivering consistency in the PERFECT-ER intervention and participant retention need to be addressed. However, an RCT may be a suboptimal research design to evaluate this intervention due to the complexity of caring for people with CI after hip fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99336264.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8886407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88864072022-03-17 PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial Cross, Jane L Hammond, Simon P Shepstone, Lee Poland, Fiona Henderson, Catherine Backhouse, Tamara Penhale, Bridget Donell, Simon Knapp, Martin Lewins, Douglas MacLullich, Alasdair Patel, Martyn Sahota, Opinder Smith, Toby O Waring, Justin Howard, Robert Ballard, Clive Fox, Chris BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVES: Assess feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to measure clinical and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced recovery pathway for people with hip fracture and cognitive impairment (CI). DESIGN: Feasibility trial undertaken between 2016 and 2018. SETTING: Eleven acute hospitals from three UK regions. PARTICIPANTS: 284 participants (208 female:69 male). Inclusion criteria: aged >60 years, confirmed proximal hip fracture requiring surgical fixation and CI; preoperative AMTS ≤8 in England or a 4AT score ≥1 in Scotland; minimum of 5 days on study ward; a ‘suitable informant’ able to provide proxy measures, recruited within 7 days of hip fracture surgery. Exclusion criteria: no hip surgery; not expected to survive beyond 4 weeks; already enrolled in a clinical trial. INTERVENTION: PERFECT-ER, an enhanced recovery pathway with 15 quality targets supported by a checklist and manual, a service improvement lead a process lead and implemented using a plan–do–study–act model. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes: recruitment and attrition, intervention acceptability, completion of participant reported outcome measures, preliminary estimates of potential effectiveness using mortality, EQ-5D-5L, economic and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: 282 participants were consented and recruited (132, intervention) from a target of 400. Mean recruitment rates were the same in intervention and control sites, (range: 1.2 and 2.7 participants/month). Retention was 230 (86%) at 1 month and 54%(144) at 6 months. At 3 months a relatively small effect (one quarter of an SD) was observed on health-related quality of life of the patient measured with EQ-5D-5L proxy in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: This trial design was feasible with modifications to recruitment. Mechanisms for delivering consistency in the PERFECT-ER intervention and participant retention need to be addressed. However, an RCT may be a suboptimal research design to evaluate this intervention due to the complexity of caring for people with CI after hip fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99336264. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8886407/ /pubmed/35228288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055267 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Cross, Jane L
Hammond, Simon P
Shepstone, Lee
Poland, Fiona
Henderson, Catherine
Backhouse, Tamara
Penhale, Bridget
Donell, Simon
Knapp, Martin
Lewins, Douglas
MacLullich, Alasdair
Patel, Martyn
Sahota, Opinder
Smith, Toby O
Waring, Justin
Howard, Robert
Ballard, Clive
Fox, Chris
PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short PERFECTED enhanced recovery pathway (PERFECT-ER) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort perfected enhanced recovery pathway (perfect-er) versus standard acute hospital care for people after hip fracture surgery who have cognitive impairment: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055267
work_keys_str_mv AT crossjanel perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hammondsimonp perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shepstonelee perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT polandfiona perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hendersoncatherine perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT backhousetamara perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT penhalebridget perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT donellsimon perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knappmartin perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lewinsdouglas perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maclullichalasdair perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT patelmartyn perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sahotaopinder perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithtobyo perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waringjustin perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT howardrobert perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ballardclive perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT foxchris perfectedenhancedrecoverypathwayperfecterversusstandardacutehospitalcareforpeopleafterhipfracturesurgerywhohavecognitiveimpairmentafeasibilityclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial