Cargando…

Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission

BACKGROUND: Rebleeding can cause a catastrophic outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A clinical + morphology nomogram was promoted in our previous study to assist in discriminating the rupture intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) with a high risk of rebleeding. The aim of this study was to val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sui, Jianfei, Wang, Nuochuan, Jiang, Pengjun, Wu, Jun, Wang, Qingzhen, Yuan, Qiaolin, He, Hongwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41016-022-00274-4
_version_ 1784660755520421888
author Sui, Jianfei
Wang, Nuochuan
Jiang, Pengjun
Wu, Jun
Wang, Qingzhen
Yuan, Qiaolin
He, Hongwei
author_facet Sui, Jianfei
Wang, Nuochuan
Jiang, Pengjun
Wu, Jun
Wang, Qingzhen
Yuan, Qiaolin
He, Hongwei
author_sort Sui, Jianfei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rebleeding can cause a catastrophic outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A clinical + morphology nomogram was promoted in our previous study to assist in discriminating the rupture intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) with a high risk of rebleeding. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive accuracy of this nomogram model. METHOD: The patients with RIAs in two medical centers from December 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, whose clinical and morphological parameters were collected. The Cox regression model was employed to identify the risk factors related to rebleeding after their admission. The predicting accuracy of clinical + morphological nomogram, ELAPSS score and PHASES score was compared based on the area under the curves (AUCs). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients with RIAs were finally included in this study, 20 of whom suffering from rebleeding after admission. Hypertension (hazard ratio (HR), 2.54; a confidence interval of 95% (CI), 1.01–6.40; P = 0.047), bifurcation (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.29–11.66; P = 0.016), and AR (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.63–4.41; P < 0.001) were demonstrated through Cox regression analysis as the independent risk factors for rebleeding after admission. The clinical + morphological nomogram had the highest predicting accuracy (AUC, 0.939, P < 0.01), followed by the bifurcation (AUC, 0.735, P = 0.001), AR (AUC, 0.666, P = 0.018), and ELAPSS score (AUC, 0.682, P = 0.009). Hypertension (AUC, 0.693, P = 0.080) or PHASES score (AUC, 0.577, P = 0.244) could not be used to predict the risk of rebleeding after admission. The calibration curve for the probability of rebleeding showed a good agreement between the prediction through clinical + morphological nomogram and actual observation. CONCLUSION: Hypertension, bifurcation site, and AR were independent risk factors related to the rebleeding of RIAs after admission. The clinical + morphological nomogram could help doctors to identify the high-risk RIAs with a high predictive accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41016-022-00274-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8886787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88867872022-03-17 Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission Sui, Jianfei Wang, Nuochuan Jiang, Pengjun Wu, Jun Wang, Qingzhen Yuan, Qiaolin He, Hongwei Chin Neurosurg J Research BACKGROUND: Rebleeding can cause a catastrophic outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A clinical + morphology nomogram was promoted in our previous study to assist in discriminating the rupture intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) with a high risk of rebleeding. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive accuracy of this nomogram model. METHOD: The patients with RIAs in two medical centers from December 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, whose clinical and morphological parameters were collected. The Cox regression model was employed to identify the risk factors related to rebleeding after their admission. The predicting accuracy of clinical + morphological nomogram, ELAPSS score and PHASES score was compared based on the area under the curves (AUCs). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients with RIAs were finally included in this study, 20 of whom suffering from rebleeding after admission. Hypertension (hazard ratio (HR), 2.54; a confidence interval of 95% (CI), 1.01–6.40; P = 0.047), bifurcation (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.29–11.66; P = 0.016), and AR (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.63–4.41; P < 0.001) were demonstrated through Cox regression analysis as the independent risk factors for rebleeding after admission. The clinical + morphological nomogram had the highest predicting accuracy (AUC, 0.939, P < 0.01), followed by the bifurcation (AUC, 0.735, P = 0.001), AR (AUC, 0.666, P = 0.018), and ELAPSS score (AUC, 0.682, P = 0.009). Hypertension (AUC, 0.693, P = 0.080) or PHASES score (AUC, 0.577, P = 0.244) could not be used to predict the risk of rebleeding after admission. The calibration curve for the probability of rebleeding showed a good agreement between the prediction through clinical + morphological nomogram and actual observation. CONCLUSION: Hypertension, bifurcation site, and AR were independent risk factors related to the rebleeding of RIAs after admission. The clinical + morphological nomogram could help doctors to identify the high-risk RIAs with a high predictive accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41016-022-00274-4. BioMed Central 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8886787/ /pubmed/35227316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41016-022-00274-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sui, Jianfei
Wang, Nuochuan
Jiang, Pengjun
Wu, Jun
Wang, Qingzhen
Yuan, Qiaolin
He, Hongwei
Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title_full Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title_fullStr Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title_short Validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
title_sort validation of the predictive accuracy of “clinical + morphology nomogram” for the rebleeding risk of ruptured intracranial aneurysms after admission
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35227316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41016-022-00274-4
work_keys_str_mv AT suijianfei validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT wangnuochuan validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT jiangpengjun validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT wujun validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT wangqingzhen validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT yuanqiaolin validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission
AT hehongwei validationofthepredictiveaccuracyofclinicalmorphologynomogramfortherebleedingriskofrupturedintracranialaneurysmsafteradmission