Cargando…
Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review
BACKGROUND: Social media use has exploded, attaining a significant influence within medicine. Previous studies have denoted the use of social media in various surgical specialties as a means to exchange professional ideas and improve the conference experience and at the same time, some have assessed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35230534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9 |
_version_ | 1784660772616404992 |
---|---|
author | Lima, Diego L. Viscarret, Valentina Velasco, Juan Lima, Raquel Nogueira C. L. Malcher, Flavio |
author_facet | Lima, Diego L. Viscarret, Valentina Velasco, Juan Lima, Raquel Nogueira C. L. Malcher, Flavio |
author_sort | Lima, Diego L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Social media use has exploded, attaining a significant influence within medicine. Previous studies have denoted the use of social media in various surgical specialties as a means to exchange professional ideas and improve the conference experience and at the same time, some have assessed its feasibility as a method of education. This systematic review aims to characterize the use of social media as a tool for general surgery education. METHODS: A systematic review of several databases from each database inception was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The JBI’s critical appraisal tools were used to assess quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 861 articles were identified of which 222 were duplicates removed. The titles and abstracts from the remaining 639 abstracts were screened and 589 were excluded. The remaining 51 full articles were analyzed for eligibility, of which 24 met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies covered the general surgery specialty, of which 11 (n = 46%) focused on the laparoscopic surgical approach, 1 (n = 4%) on robotic-assisted surgical procedures, 1 (n = 4%) on both surgical approaches previously mentioned and 11 (n = 46%) on the general surgery specialty regardless of the surgical approach or technique. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages that SM offers should be considered, and content creators and institutions should help collectively to make sure that the content being published is evidence and guideline-based so its use it is taken to the maximum benefit. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8886864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88868642022-03-02 Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review Lima, Diego L. Viscarret, Valentina Velasco, Juan Lima, Raquel Nogueira C. L. Malcher, Flavio Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Social media use has exploded, attaining a significant influence within medicine. Previous studies have denoted the use of social media in various surgical specialties as a means to exchange professional ideas and improve the conference experience and at the same time, some have assessed its feasibility as a method of education. This systematic review aims to characterize the use of social media as a tool for general surgery education. METHODS: A systematic review of several databases from each database inception was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The JBI’s critical appraisal tools were used to assess quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 861 articles were identified of which 222 were duplicates removed. The titles and abstracts from the remaining 639 abstracts were screened and 589 were excluded. The remaining 51 full articles were analyzed for eligibility, of which 24 met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies covered the general surgery specialty, of which 11 (n = 46%) focused on the laparoscopic surgical approach, 1 (n = 4%) on robotic-assisted surgical procedures, 1 (n = 4%) on both surgical approaches previously mentioned and 11 (n = 46%) on the general surgery specialty regardless of the surgical approach or technique. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages that SM offers should be considered, and content creators and institutions should help collectively to make sure that the content being published is evidence and guideline-based so its use it is taken to the maximum benefit. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9. Springer US 2022-03-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8886864/ /pubmed/35230534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lima, Diego L. Viscarret, Valentina Velasco, Juan Lima, Raquel Nogueira C. L. Malcher, Flavio Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title | Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title_full | Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title_fullStr | Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title_short | Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
title_sort | social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8886864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35230534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limadiegol socialmediaasatoolforsurgicaleducationaqualitativesystematicreview AT viscarretvalentina socialmediaasatoolforsurgicaleducationaqualitativesystematicreview AT velascojuan socialmediaasatoolforsurgicaleducationaqualitativesystematicreview AT limaraquelnogueiracl socialmediaasatoolforsurgicaleducationaqualitativesystematicreview AT malcherflavio socialmediaasatoolforsurgicaleducationaqualitativesystematicreview |