Cargando…

Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) offers minimally invasive decompression when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Stents can be placed from the intrahepatic ducts into the stomach (hepaticogastrostomy [HG]) or from the extrahepatic bile d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyberg, Amy, Napoleon, Bertrand, Robles-Medranda, Carlos, Shah, Janak N., Bories, Erwan, Kumta, Nikhil A., Yague, Andres Sanchez, Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique, Lakhtakia, Sundeep, Chafic, Abdul Hamid El, Shah, Shawn L., Sameera, Sohini, Tawadros, Augustine, Ardengh, Jose Celso, Kedia, Prashant, Gaidhane, Monica, Giovannini, Marc, Kahaleh, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494590
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00006
_version_ 1784660811938004992
author Tyberg, Amy
Napoleon, Bertrand
Robles-Medranda, Carlos
Shah, Janak N.
Bories, Erwan
Kumta, Nikhil A.
Yague, Andres Sanchez
Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Lakhtakia, Sundeep
Chafic, Abdul Hamid El
Shah, Shawn L.
Sameera, Sohini
Tawadros, Augustine
Ardengh, Jose Celso
Kedia, Prashant
Gaidhane, Monica
Giovannini, Marc
Kahaleh, Michel
author_facet Tyberg, Amy
Napoleon, Bertrand
Robles-Medranda, Carlos
Shah, Janak N.
Bories, Erwan
Kumta, Nikhil A.
Yague, Andres Sanchez
Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Lakhtakia, Sundeep
Chafic, Abdul Hamid El
Shah, Shawn L.
Sameera, Sohini
Tawadros, Augustine
Ardengh, Jose Celso
Kedia, Prashant
Gaidhane, Monica
Giovannini, Marc
Kahaleh, Michel
author_sort Tyberg, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) offers minimally invasive decompression when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Stents can be placed from the intrahepatic ducts into the stomach (hepaticogastrostomy [HG]) or from the extrahepatic bile duct into the small intestine (choledochoduodenostomy [CCD]). Long-term patency of these stents is unknown. In this study, we aim to compare long-term patency of CCD versus HG. METHODS: Consecutive patients from 12 centers were included in a registry over 14 years. Demographics, procedure info, adverse events, and follow-up data were collected. Student's t-test, Chi–square, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up or who died within 6-month postprocedure were included. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-two patients were included (93% male; mean age: 70; HG n = 95, CCD n = 87). No significant difference in indication, diagnosis, dissection instrument, or stent type was seen between the two groups. Technical success was 92% in both groups. Clinical success was achieved in 75/87 (86%) in the HG group and 80/80 (100%) in the CCD group. A trend toward higher adverse events was seen in the CCD group. A total of 25 patients out of 87 needed stent revision in the HG group (success rate 71%), while eight out of 80 were revised in the CCD group (success rate 90%). Chi square shows CCD success higher than HG (90% vs. 71%, P = 0.010). After adjusting for diagnosis, jaundice or cholangitis presentation, instrument used for dissection, and gender, CCD was 4.5 times more likely than HG to achieve longer stent patency or manage obstruction (odds ratio 4.5; 95% 1.1548–17.6500, P = 0.0302). CONCLUSION: CCD is associated with superior long-term patency than HG but with a trend toward higher adverse events. This is particularly important in patients with increased survival. Additional studies are required before recommending a change in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8887039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88870392022-03-10 Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency Tyberg, Amy Napoleon, Bertrand Robles-Medranda, Carlos Shah, Janak N. Bories, Erwan Kumta, Nikhil A. Yague, Andres Sanchez Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Lakhtakia, Sundeep Chafic, Abdul Hamid El Shah, Shawn L. Sameera, Sohini Tawadros, Augustine Ardengh, Jose Celso Kedia, Prashant Gaidhane, Monica Giovannini, Marc Kahaleh, Michel Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) offers minimally invasive decompression when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Stents can be placed from the intrahepatic ducts into the stomach (hepaticogastrostomy [HG]) or from the extrahepatic bile duct into the small intestine (choledochoduodenostomy [CCD]). Long-term patency of these stents is unknown. In this study, we aim to compare long-term patency of CCD versus HG. METHODS: Consecutive patients from 12 centers were included in a registry over 14 years. Demographics, procedure info, adverse events, and follow-up data were collected. Student's t-test, Chi–square, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up or who died within 6-month postprocedure were included. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-two patients were included (93% male; mean age: 70; HG n = 95, CCD n = 87). No significant difference in indication, diagnosis, dissection instrument, or stent type was seen between the two groups. Technical success was 92% in both groups. Clinical success was achieved in 75/87 (86%) in the HG group and 80/80 (100%) in the CCD group. A trend toward higher adverse events was seen in the CCD group. A total of 25 patients out of 87 needed stent revision in the HG group (success rate 71%), while eight out of 80 were revised in the CCD group (success rate 90%). Chi square shows CCD success higher than HG (90% vs. 71%, P = 0.010). After adjusting for diagnosis, jaundice or cholangitis presentation, instrument used for dissection, and gender, CCD was 4.5 times more likely than HG to achieve longer stent patency or manage obstruction (odds ratio 4.5; 95% 1.1548–17.6500, P = 0.0302). CONCLUSION: CCD is associated with superior long-term patency than HG but with a trend toward higher adverse events. This is particularly important in patients with increased survival. Additional studies are required before recommending a change in practice. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8887039/ /pubmed/34494590 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00006 Text en Copyright: © 2021 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tyberg, Amy
Napoleon, Bertrand
Robles-Medranda, Carlos
Shah, Janak N.
Bories, Erwan
Kumta, Nikhil A.
Yague, Andres Sanchez
Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
Lakhtakia, Sundeep
Chafic, Abdul Hamid El
Shah, Shawn L.
Sameera, Sohini
Tawadros, Augustine
Ardengh, Jose Celso
Kedia, Prashant
Gaidhane, Monica
Giovannini, Marc
Kahaleh, Michel
Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title_full Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title_fullStr Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title_full_unstemmed Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title_short Hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: An international multicenter study on their long-term patency
title_sort hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy: an international multicenter study on their long-term patency
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494590
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00006
work_keys_str_mv AT tybergamy hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT napoleonbertrand hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT roblesmedrandacarlos hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT shahjanakn hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT borieserwan hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT kumtanikhila hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT yagueandressanchez hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT vazquezsequeirosenrique hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT lakhtakiasundeep hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT chaficabdulhamidel hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT shahshawnl hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT sameerasohini hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT tawadrosaugustine hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT ardenghjosecelso hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT kediaprashant hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT gaidhanemonica hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT giovanninimarc hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency
AT kahalehmichel hepaticogastrostomyversuscholedochoduodenostomyaninternationalmulticenterstudyontheirlongtermpatency