Cargando…

Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection

PURPOSE: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Juan, Liang, Qiqiang, Chen, Xinyi, Wu, Jing, Wu, Yanchao, Teng, Gaoqin, Huang, Man
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241917
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S350976
_version_ 1784661003749818368
author Chen, Juan
Liang, Qiqiang
Chen, Xinyi
Wu, Jing
Wu, Yanchao
Teng, Gaoqin
Huang, Man
author_facet Chen, Juan
Liang, Qiqiang
Chen, Xinyi
Wu, Jing
Wu, Yanchao
Teng, Gaoqin
Huang, Man
author_sort Chen, Juan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CAZ/AVI and polymyxin B against CRPA infection and analyze the independent predictors of 30-day mortality or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with CRPA infection treated with CAZ/AVI or polymyxin B between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and bacterial clearance. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and COX regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with CRPA infection were enrolled, including 51 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 85 patients in the polymyxin B group. The 14-day mortality (5.9% vs 27.1%, p=0.002), 30-day mortality (13.7% vs 47.1%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (29.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were significantly lower than the polymyxin B group. The bacterial clearance rate (45.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were higher than in the polymyxin B group. After adjustment by propensity score matching, the CAV/AVI group still had lower 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 42.9%, p=0.018) and higher bacterial clearance rate (42.9% vs 14.3%, p=0.018) than the polymyxin B group. The multivariate COX analysis showed that the age was identified as independent predictor of 30-day mortality while CAZ/AVI therapy and central venous catheterization emerged as independent predictors of 30-day survival. CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI therapy was superior to polymyxin B therapy for patients with CRPA infection, and provided significant survival benefits, but further larger studies were needed to substantiate our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8887910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88879102022-03-02 Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Chen, Juan Liang, Qiqiang Chen, Xinyi Wu, Jing Wu, Yanchao Teng, Gaoqin Huang, Man Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CAZ/AVI and polymyxin B against CRPA infection and analyze the independent predictors of 30-day mortality or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with CRPA infection treated with CAZ/AVI or polymyxin B between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and bacterial clearance. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and COX regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with CRPA infection were enrolled, including 51 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 85 patients in the polymyxin B group. The 14-day mortality (5.9% vs 27.1%, p=0.002), 30-day mortality (13.7% vs 47.1%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (29.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were significantly lower than the polymyxin B group. The bacterial clearance rate (45.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were higher than in the polymyxin B group. After adjustment by propensity score matching, the CAV/AVI group still had lower 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 42.9%, p=0.018) and higher bacterial clearance rate (42.9% vs 14.3%, p=0.018) than the polymyxin B group. The multivariate COX analysis showed that the age was identified as independent predictor of 30-day mortality while CAZ/AVI therapy and central venous catheterization emerged as independent predictors of 30-day survival. CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI therapy was superior to polymyxin B therapy for patients with CRPA infection, and provided significant survival benefits, but further larger studies were needed to substantiate our findings. Dove 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8887910/ /pubmed/35241917 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S350976 Text en © 2022 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Juan
Liang, Qiqiang
Chen, Xinyi
Wu, Jing
Wu, Yanchao
Teng, Gaoqin
Huang, Man
Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title_full Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title_fullStr Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title_full_unstemmed Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title_short Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection
title_sort ceftazidime/avibactam versus polymyxin b in the challenge of carbapenem-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa infection
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241917
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S350976
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjuan ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT liangqiqiang ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT chenxinyi ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT wujing ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT wuyanchao ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT tenggaoqin ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection
AT huangman ceftazidimeavibactamversuspolymyxinbinthechallengeofcarbapenemresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfection