Cargando…
The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned
This pilot study assessed the acceptance and use of the e-Health instrument “the Personal Health Check” (PHC) among clients and professionals in primary care settings. By filling in the online PHC instrument, participants were provided insights into their health and lifestyle. When results revealed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00651-2 |
_version_ | 1784661005580632064 |
---|---|
author | Rombouts, M. Raaijmakers, L. G. M. Kuunders, T. J. M. Van Steijn-Martens, R. de Vuijst, T. van Donkersgoed, H. van de Goor, L. A. M. |
author_facet | Rombouts, M. Raaijmakers, L. G. M. Kuunders, T. J. M. Van Steijn-Martens, R. de Vuijst, T. van Donkersgoed, H. van de Goor, L. A. M. |
author_sort | Rombouts, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This pilot study assessed the acceptance and use of the e-Health instrument “the Personal Health Check” (PHC) among clients and professionals in primary care settings. By filling in the online PHC instrument, participants were provided insights into their health and lifestyle. When results revealed an increased health risk, participants were advised to undertake additional lab tests measuring blood pressure and haemaglobin levels. Based on the online questionnaire and optional lab tests, participants then received a report that included individually-tailored feedback from the e-Health application about personal health risks and suggestions for health interventions. The PHC was implemented in 2016 in four Dutch municipalities that determined which neighbourhood(s) the PHC targeted and how participants were invited. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was used as a theoretical framework to address our research questions. Methods used to assess acceptance were: PHC instrument data, data from additional questionnaires completed by PHC participants, focus groups with PHC participants and professionals in primary care, and telephone interviews with non-responders to the invitation to participate in the online PHC. Of the 21,735 invited, 12% participated. Our results showed that participants and professionals in this pilot were predominantly positive about the PHC. Participants reported that they made an effort to apply the PHC lifestyle advice they received. Almost all had the knowledge and resources needed to use the PHC online instrument. Invitations from general practitioners almost doubled participation relative to invitations from the sponsoring municipalities. The overall low response rate, however, suggests that the PHC is unsuitable as a foundation on which to develop local public health policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8887919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88879192022-03-02 The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned Rombouts, M. Raaijmakers, L. G. M. Kuunders, T. J. M. Van Steijn-Martens, R. de Vuijst, T. van Donkersgoed, H. van de Goor, L. A. M. J Prev (2022) Original Paper This pilot study assessed the acceptance and use of the e-Health instrument “the Personal Health Check” (PHC) among clients and professionals in primary care settings. By filling in the online PHC instrument, participants were provided insights into their health and lifestyle. When results revealed an increased health risk, participants were advised to undertake additional lab tests measuring blood pressure and haemaglobin levels. Based on the online questionnaire and optional lab tests, participants then received a report that included individually-tailored feedback from the e-Health application about personal health risks and suggestions for health interventions. The PHC was implemented in 2016 in four Dutch municipalities that determined which neighbourhood(s) the PHC targeted and how participants were invited. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was used as a theoretical framework to address our research questions. Methods used to assess acceptance were: PHC instrument data, data from additional questionnaires completed by PHC participants, focus groups with PHC participants and professionals in primary care, and telephone interviews with non-responders to the invitation to participate in the online PHC. Of the 21,735 invited, 12% participated. Our results showed that participants and professionals in this pilot were predominantly positive about the PHC. Participants reported that they made an effort to apply the PHC lifestyle advice they received. Almost all had the knowledge and resources needed to use the PHC online instrument. Invitations from general practitioners almost doubled participation relative to invitations from the sponsoring municipalities. The overall low response rate, however, suggests that the PHC is unsuitable as a foundation on which to develop local public health policy. Springer US 2021-10-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8887919/ /pubmed/34714455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00651-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rombouts, M. Raaijmakers, L. G. M. Kuunders, T. J. M. Van Steijn-Martens, R. de Vuijst, T. van Donkersgoed, H. van de Goor, L. A. M. The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title | The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title_full | The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title_fullStr | The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title_full_unstemmed | The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title_short | The Acceptance and Use of the e-Health Instrument ‘The Personal Health Check’ in Four Dutch Municipalities: Lessons Learned |
title_sort | acceptance and use of the e-health instrument ‘the personal health check’ in four dutch municipalities: lessons learned |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00651-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romboutsm theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT raaijmakerslgm theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT kuunderstjm theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vansteijnmartensr theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT devuijstt theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vandonkersgoedh theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vandegoorlam theacceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT romboutsm acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT raaijmakerslgm acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT kuunderstjm acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vansteijnmartensr acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT devuijstt acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vandonkersgoedh acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned AT vandegoorlam acceptanceanduseoftheehealthinstrumentthepersonalhealthcheckinfourdutchmunicipalitieslessonslearned |