Cargando…

GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation

AIMS: To determine whether the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD–Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) integrated risk tool predicts mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding for up to 2 years after new-onset AF and to assess how this risk tool performs compared w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Keith A A, Virdone, Saverio, Pieper, Karen S, Bassand, Jean-Pierre, Camm, A John, Fitzmaurice, David A, Goldhaber, Samuel Z, Goto, Shinya, Haas, Sylvia, Kayani, Gloria, Oto, Ali, Misselwitz, Frank, Piccini, Jonathan P, Dalgaard, Frederik, Turpie, Alexander G G, Verheugt, Freek W A, Kakkar, Ajay K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab028
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To determine whether the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD–Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) integrated risk tool predicts mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding for up to 2 years after new-onset AF and to assess how this risk tool performs compared with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED. METHODS AND RESULTS: Potential predictors of events included demographic and clinical characteristics, choice of treatment, and lifestyle factors. A Cox proportional hazards model was identified for each outcome by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods. Indices were evaluated in comparison with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED risk predictors. Models were validated internally and externally in ORBIT-AF and Danish nationwide registries. Among the 52 080 patients enrolled in GARFIELD-AF, 52 032 had follow-up data. The GARFIELD-AF risk tool outperformed CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc for all-cause mortality in all cohorts. The GARFIELD-AF risk score was superior to CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc for non-haemorrhagic stroke, and it outperformed HAS-BLED for major bleeding in internal validation and in the Danish AF cohort. In very low- to low-risk patients [CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)], the GARFIELD-AF risk score offered strong discriminatory value for all the endpoints when compared to CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED. The GARFIELD-AF tool also included the effect of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, thus allowing clinicians to compare the expected outcome of different anticoagulant treatment decisions [i.e. no OAC, non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants, or VKAs]. CONCLUSIONS: The GARFIELD-AF risk tool outperformed CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc at predicting death and non-haemorrhagic stroke, and it outperformed HAS-BLED for major bleeding in overall as well as in very low- to low-risk group patients with AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF: NCT01090362, ORBIT-AF I: NCT01165710; ORBIT-AF II: NCT01701817.