Cargando…

Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

BACKGROUND: Historically, imaging osseous detail in three dimensions required a computed tomography (CT) scan with ionizing radiation that poorly visualizes the soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chalmers, Peter N., Christensen, Garrett V., Ishikawa, Hiroaki, Henninger, Heath B., Kholmovski, Eugene G., Mills, Megan, Tashjian, Robert Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.010
_version_ 1784661077685960704
author Chalmers, Peter N.
Christensen, Garrett V.
Ishikawa, Hiroaki
Henninger, Heath B.
Kholmovski, Eugene G.
Mills, Megan
Tashjian, Robert Z.
author_facet Chalmers, Peter N.
Christensen, Garrett V.
Ishikawa, Hiroaki
Henninger, Heath B.
Kholmovski, Eugene G.
Mills, Megan
Tashjian, Robert Z.
author_sort Chalmers, Peter N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Historically, imaging osseous detail in three dimensions required a computed tomography (CT) scan with ionizing radiation that poorly visualizes the soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring humeral cortical thickness and cancellous density as compared with CT. METHODS: This was a comparative radiographic study in nine cadavers, each of which underwent CT and UTE MRI. On images aligned to the center of the humeral shaft, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral humeral cortical thickness was measured 5, 10, and 15 cm distal to the top of the head. Cancellous density was measured as signal within a 1-cm diameter region of interest in the center of the head, the subtuberosity head, the subarticular head, and the subarticular glenoid vault. Glenoid cortical thickness was measured at the center of the glenoid. Cortical measurements were compared using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, paired Student’s t-tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We compared cancellous measurements using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. For all measurements, we calculated interobserver and intraobserver reliability using ICCs with 0.75 as the lower limit for acceptability. RESULTS: With regard to accuracy, for humeral cortical thickness measurements, there were no significant differences between MRI and CT measures, and ICCs were >0.75. The glenoid cortical thickness ICC was <0.75. There was no significant correlation between the cancellous signal on MRI and on CT in any region. For both MRI and CT, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability were acceptable (ie, >0.75) for almost all humeral cortical thickness measures. CONCLUSION: UTE MRI can reliably and accurately measure humeral cortical thickness, but cannot accurately measure cancellous density or accurately and reliably measure glenoid cortical thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88881692022-03-03 Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness? Chalmers, Peter N. Christensen, Garrett V. Ishikawa, Hiroaki Henninger, Heath B. Kholmovski, Eugene G. Mills, Megan Tashjian, Robert Z. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Historically, imaging osseous detail in three dimensions required a computed tomography (CT) scan with ionizing radiation that poorly visualizes the soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring humeral cortical thickness and cancellous density as compared with CT. METHODS: This was a comparative radiographic study in nine cadavers, each of which underwent CT and UTE MRI. On images aligned to the center of the humeral shaft, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral humeral cortical thickness was measured 5, 10, and 15 cm distal to the top of the head. Cancellous density was measured as signal within a 1-cm diameter region of interest in the center of the head, the subtuberosity head, the subarticular head, and the subarticular glenoid vault. Glenoid cortical thickness was measured at the center of the glenoid. Cortical measurements were compared using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, paired Student’s t-tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We compared cancellous measurements using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. For all measurements, we calculated interobserver and intraobserver reliability using ICCs with 0.75 as the lower limit for acceptability. RESULTS: With regard to accuracy, for humeral cortical thickness measurements, there were no significant differences between MRI and CT measures, and ICCs were >0.75. The glenoid cortical thickness ICC was <0.75. There was no significant correlation between the cancellous signal on MRI and on CT in any region. For both MRI and CT, interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability were acceptable (ie, >0.75) for almost all humeral cortical thickness measures. CONCLUSION: UTE MRI can reliably and accurately measure humeral cortical thickness, but cannot accurately measure cancellous density or accurately and reliably measure glenoid cortical thickness. Elsevier 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8888169/ /pubmed/35252930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.010 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Chalmers, Peter N.
Christensen, Garrett V.
Ishikawa, Hiroaki
Henninger, Heath B.
Kholmovski, Eugene G.
Mills, Megan
Tashjian, Robert Z.
Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title_full Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title_fullStr Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title_full_unstemmed Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title_short Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
title_sort can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.010
work_keys_str_mv AT chalmerspetern canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT christensengarrettv canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT ishikawahiroaki canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT henningerheathb canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT kholmovskieugeneg canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT millsmegan canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness
AT tashjianrobertz canmagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelyandreliablymeasurehumeralcorticalthickness