Cargando…

Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Formal physical therapy (PT) traditionally has been a critical part of postoperative recovery, but recently, because of cost containment, coverage of PT has become limited. Alternatives to formal PT have been proposed, including telerehabilitation, internet-based PT (IBPT), and home-base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabesan, Vani J., Dawoud, Mirelle, Stephens, B. Joshua, Busheme, Cara E., Lavin, Alessia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.014
_version_ 1784661078459809792
author Sabesan, Vani J.
Dawoud, Mirelle
Stephens, B. Joshua
Busheme, Cara E.
Lavin, Alessia C.
author_facet Sabesan, Vani J.
Dawoud, Mirelle
Stephens, B. Joshua
Busheme, Cara E.
Lavin, Alessia C.
author_sort Sabesan, Vani J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Formal physical therapy (PT) traditionally has been a critical part of postoperative recovery, but recently, because of cost containment, coverage of PT has become limited. Alternatives to formal PT have been proposed, including telerehabilitation, internet-based PT (IBPT), and home-based physician-guided PT. The purpose of this study was to understand patient perceptions of PT, the benefits, perception of improvements, access to PT, and alternative forms of PT after shoulder surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent orthopedic shoulder surgery were anonymously surveyed at one institution. Demographics, PT access, number of PT sessions, insurance, copayment, patients’ perceptions of improvement, and their opinion about IBPT were collected. Answers were designed using Likert-scale or open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey data. Analyses were performed based on demographic variables using independent t-test, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Patients attended an average of 16.3 ± 13.8 PT sessions, with 65% ± 32.2 attributing average improvement to their sessions. Average copay was $18 ± 20.8 per session, which 56.1% agreed was reasonable. Almost all patients (94.8%) agreed their therapist took time to educate them. Half (52.5%) disagreed that successful PT could be achieved by IBPT, and 68.6% of patients responded they would not consider using IBPT even after a few in-person sessions. CONCLUSION: Patients have a positive perception of their therapist, cost, number of sessions, and utility of PT to impact improvements after orthopedic shoulder surgery. For IBPT to be a viable alternative, it should involve close engagement of a physical therapist given patients’ perceptions of PT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88881722022-03-03 Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery Sabesan, Vani J. Dawoud, Mirelle Stephens, B. Joshua Busheme, Cara E. Lavin, Alessia C. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Formal physical therapy (PT) traditionally has been a critical part of postoperative recovery, but recently, because of cost containment, coverage of PT has become limited. Alternatives to formal PT have been proposed, including telerehabilitation, internet-based PT (IBPT), and home-based physician-guided PT. The purpose of this study was to understand patient perceptions of PT, the benefits, perception of improvements, access to PT, and alternative forms of PT after shoulder surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent orthopedic shoulder surgery were anonymously surveyed at one institution. Demographics, PT access, number of PT sessions, insurance, copayment, patients’ perceptions of improvement, and their opinion about IBPT were collected. Answers were designed using Likert-scale or open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey data. Analyses were performed based on demographic variables using independent t-test, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Patients attended an average of 16.3 ± 13.8 PT sessions, with 65% ± 32.2 attributing average improvement to their sessions. Average copay was $18 ± 20.8 per session, which 56.1% agreed was reasonable. Almost all patients (94.8%) agreed their therapist took time to educate them. Half (52.5%) disagreed that successful PT could be achieved by IBPT, and 68.6% of patients responded they would not consider using IBPT even after a few in-person sessions. CONCLUSION: Patients have a positive perception of their therapist, cost, number of sessions, and utility of PT to impact improvements after orthopedic shoulder surgery. For IBPT to be a viable alternative, it should involve close engagement of a physical therapist given patients’ perceptions of PT. Elsevier 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8888172/ /pubmed/35252929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.014 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Sabesan, Vani J.
Dawoud, Mirelle
Stephens, B. Joshua
Busheme, Cara E.
Lavin, Alessia C.
Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title_full Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title_fullStr Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title_short Patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
title_sort patients’ perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.014
work_keys_str_mv AT sabesanvanij patientsperceptionofphysicaltherapyaftershouldersurgery
AT dawoudmirelle patientsperceptionofphysicaltherapyaftershouldersurgery
AT stephensbjoshua patientsperceptionofphysicaltherapyaftershouldersurgery
AT bushemecarae patientsperceptionofphysicaltherapyaftershouldersurgery
AT lavinalessiac patientsperceptionofphysicaltherapyaftershouldersurgery