Cargando…

DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies

DNA repair phenotype can be measured in blood and may be a potential biomarker of cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies of DNA repair phenotype and cancer through March 2021. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Hui-Chen, Kehm, Rebecca, Santella, Regina M., Brenner, David J., Terry, Mary Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07256-7
_version_ 1784661198077165568
author Wu, Hui-Chen
Kehm, Rebecca
Santella, Regina M.
Brenner, David J.
Terry, Mary Beth
author_facet Wu, Hui-Chen
Kehm, Rebecca
Santella, Regina M.
Brenner, David J.
Terry, Mary Beth
author_sort Wu, Hui-Chen
collection PubMed
description DNA repair phenotype can be measured in blood and may be a potential biomarker of cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies of DNA repair phenotype and cancer through March 2021. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) of cancer risk for those with the lowest DNA repair capacity compared with those with the highest capacity. We included 55 case–control studies that evaluated 12 different cancers using 10 different DNA repair assays. The pooled OR of cancer risk (all cancer types combined) was 2.92 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.49, 3.43) for the lowest DNA repair. Lower DNA repair was associated with all studied cancer types, and pooled ORs (95% CI) ranged from 2.02 (1.43, 2.85) for skin cancer to 7.60 (3.26, 17.72) for liver cancer. All assays, except the homologous recombination repair assay, showed statistically significant associations with cancer. The effect size ranged from 1.90 (1.00, 3.60) for the etoposide-induced double-strand break assay to 5.06 (3.67, 6.99) for the γ-H2AX assay. The consistency and strength of the associations support the use of these phenotypic biomarkers; however large-scale prospective studies will be important for understanding their use related to age and screening initiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88886132022-03-03 DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies Wu, Hui-Chen Kehm, Rebecca Santella, Regina M. Brenner, David J. Terry, Mary Beth Sci Rep Article DNA repair phenotype can be measured in blood and may be a potential biomarker of cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies of DNA repair phenotype and cancer through March 2021. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) of cancer risk for those with the lowest DNA repair capacity compared with those with the highest capacity. We included 55 case–control studies that evaluated 12 different cancers using 10 different DNA repair assays. The pooled OR of cancer risk (all cancer types combined) was 2.92 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.49, 3.43) for the lowest DNA repair. Lower DNA repair was associated with all studied cancer types, and pooled ORs (95% CI) ranged from 2.02 (1.43, 2.85) for skin cancer to 7.60 (3.26, 17.72) for liver cancer. All assays, except the homologous recombination repair assay, showed statistically significant associations with cancer. The effect size ranged from 1.90 (1.00, 3.60) for the etoposide-induced double-strand break assay to 5.06 (3.67, 6.99) for the γ-H2AX assay. The consistency and strength of the associations support the use of these phenotypic biomarkers; however large-scale prospective studies will be important for understanding their use related to age and screening initiation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8888613/ /pubmed/35233009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07256-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Hui-Chen
Kehm, Rebecca
Santella, Regina M.
Brenner, David J.
Terry, Mary Beth
DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title_full DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title_fullStr DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title_full_unstemmed DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title_short DNA repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
title_sort dna repair phenotype and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 case–control studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07256-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wuhuichen dnarepairphenotypeandcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof55casecontrolstudies
AT kehmrebecca dnarepairphenotypeandcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof55casecontrolstudies
AT santellareginam dnarepairphenotypeandcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof55casecontrolstudies
AT brennerdavidj dnarepairphenotypeandcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof55casecontrolstudies
AT terrymarybeth dnarepairphenotypeandcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof55casecontrolstudies