Cargando…

A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical benefits of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with high bleeding risk. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with high bleeding risk NVAF who were hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Peng-Hui, Liu, Ze-Hua, Niu, Ming-Hui, Chen, Ping, Shi, Yuan-Bin, He, Fei, Guo, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252386
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.803233
_version_ 1784661241590972416
author Liu, Peng-Hui
Liu, Ze-Hua
Niu, Ming-Hui
Chen, Ping
Shi, Yuan-Bin
He, Fei
Guo, Rong
author_facet Liu, Peng-Hui
Liu, Ze-Hua
Niu, Ming-Hui
Chen, Ping
Shi, Yuan-Bin
He, Fei
Guo, Rong
author_sort Liu, Peng-Hui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical benefits of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with high bleeding risk. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with high bleeding risk NVAF who were hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2019 and took at least rivaroxaban and warfarin. The clinical benefits of both drugs were assessed by efficacy benefit and safety risk. The primary efficacy benefit was a composite end point for stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism. The secondary efficacy end points were death and myocardial infarction (MI). The principal safety end point was the composite end point of fatal bleeding and critical organ bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1,246 patients with high bleeding risk were enrolled, including 787 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 459 patients in the warfarin group. Results of the primary efficacy benefit endpoint were obtained from 104 patients (13.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and 88 (19.2%) patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.681; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.512–0.906; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The principal safety end points were observed in 49 (6.23%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 55 (11.98%) patients in the warfarin group (HR: 0.469 in the rivaroxaban group; 95% CI: 0.314–0.702; P < 0.001). With respect to secondary efficacy and benefit endpoints, 28 (3.56%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 22 (4.79%) patients in the warfarin group died, with an HR of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.435–1.329; P = 0.336); 32 (4.07%) patients in the rivaroxaban group; and 26 (5.66%) patients in the warfarin group had MI, with an HR of 1.940 (95% CI: 0.495–1.069, P = 0.254) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with high blood NVAF. Rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin in reducing fatal bleeding and bleeding in critical organs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100052454.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88888292022-03-03 A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk Liu, Peng-Hui Liu, Ze-Hua Niu, Ming-Hui Chen, Ping Shi, Yuan-Bin He, Fei Guo, Rong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical benefits of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with high bleeding risk. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with high bleeding risk NVAF who were hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2019 and took at least rivaroxaban and warfarin. The clinical benefits of both drugs were assessed by efficacy benefit and safety risk. The primary efficacy benefit was a composite end point for stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism. The secondary efficacy end points were death and myocardial infarction (MI). The principal safety end point was the composite end point of fatal bleeding and critical organ bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1,246 patients with high bleeding risk were enrolled, including 787 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 459 patients in the warfarin group. Results of the primary efficacy benefit endpoint were obtained from 104 patients (13.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and 88 (19.2%) patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.681; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.512–0.906; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The principal safety end points were observed in 49 (6.23%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 55 (11.98%) patients in the warfarin group (HR: 0.469 in the rivaroxaban group; 95% CI: 0.314–0.702; P < 0.001). With respect to secondary efficacy and benefit endpoints, 28 (3.56%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 22 (4.79%) patients in the warfarin group died, with an HR of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.435–1.329; P = 0.336); 32 (4.07%) patients in the rivaroxaban group; and 26 (5.66%) patients in the warfarin group had MI, with an HR of 1.940 (95% CI: 0.495–1.069, P = 0.254) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with high blood NVAF. Rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin in reducing fatal bleeding and bleeding in critical organs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100052454. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8888829/ /pubmed/35252386 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.803233 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Liu, Niu, Chen, Shi, He and Guo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Liu, Peng-Hui
Liu, Ze-Hua
Niu, Ming-Hui
Chen, Ping
Shi, Yuan-Bin
He, Fei
Guo, Rong
A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title_full A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title_short A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk
title_sort comparative study of the clinical benefits of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with high bleeding risk
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252386
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.803233
work_keys_str_mv AT liupenghui acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT liuzehua acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT niuminghui acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT chenping acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT shiyuanbin acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT hefei acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT guorong acomparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT liupenghui comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT liuzehua comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT niuminghui comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT chenping comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT shiyuanbin comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT hefei comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk
AT guorong comparativestudyoftheclinicalbenefitsofrivaroxabanandwarfarininpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwithhighbleedingrisk