Cargando…

Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility

BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preisner, Fabian, Behnisch, Rouven, Schwehr, Véronique, Godel, Tim, Schwarz, Daniel, Foesleitner, Olivia, Bäumer, Philipp, Heiland, Sabine, Bendszus, Martin, Kronlage, Moritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316
_version_ 1784661270309371904
author Preisner, Fabian
Behnisch, Rouven
Schwehr, Véronique
Godel, Tim
Schwarz, Daniel
Foesleitner, Olivia
Bäumer, Philipp
Heiland, Sabine
Bendszus, Martin
Kronlage, Moritz
author_facet Preisner, Fabian
Behnisch, Rouven
Schwehr, Véronique
Godel, Tim
Schwarz, Daniel
Foesleitner, Olivia
Bäumer, Philipp
Heiland, Sabine
Bendszus, Martin
Kronlage, Moritz
author_sort Preisner, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parameters of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively examined at three different 3.0T MR scanners and underwent MRN of their sciatic nerve using comparable imaging protocols including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T2 relaxometry. Subsequently, inter-scanner agreement was assessed for seven different parameters by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: Assessment of inter-scanner reliability revealed good to excellent agreement for T2 (ICC: 0.846) and the quantitative DTI parameters, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) (ICC: 0.876), whereas moderate agreement was observed for proton spin density (PD) (ICC: 0.51). Analysis of variance identified significant inter-scanner differences for several parameters, such as FA (p < 0.001; p = 0.02), T2 (p < 0.01) and PD (p = 0.02; p < 0.01; p = 0.02). Calculated SEM values were mostly within the range of one standard deviation of the absolute mean values, for example 0.033 for FA, 4.12 ms for T2 and 27.8 for PD. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the measurement imprecision for peripheral nerve DTI and T2 relaxometry, which is associated with the use of different MR scanners. The here presented values may serve as an orientation of the possible scanner-associated fluctuations of MRN biomarkers, which can occur under similar conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88889272022-03-03 Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility Preisner, Fabian Behnisch, Rouven Schwehr, Véronique Godel, Tim Schwarz, Daniel Foesleitner, Olivia Bäumer, Philipp Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Kronlage, Moritz Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parameters of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively examined at three different 3.0T MR scanners and underwent MRN of their sciatic nerve using comparable imaging protocols including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T2 relaxometry. Subsequently, inter-scanner agreement was assessed for seven different parameters by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: Assessment of inter-scanner reliability revealed good to excellent agreement for T2 (ICC: 0.846) and the quantitative DTI parameters, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) (ICC: 0.876), whereas moderate agreement was observed for proton spin density (PD) (ICC: 0.51). Analysis of variance identified significant inter-scanner differences for several parameters, such as FA (p < 0.001; p = 0.02), T2 (p < 0.01) and PD (p = 0.02; p < 0.01; p = 0.02). Calculated SEM values were mostly within the range of one standard deviation of the absolute mean values, for example 0.033 for FA, 4.12 ms for T2 and 27.8 for PD. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the measurement imprecision for peripheral nerve DTI and T2 relaxometry, which is associated with the use of different MR scanners. The here presented values may serve as an orientation of the possible scanner-associated fluctuations of MRN biomarkers, which can occur under similar conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8888927/ /pubmed/35250457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316 Text en Copyright © 2022 Preisner, Behnisch, Schwehr, Godel, Schwarz, Foesleitner, Bäumer, Heiland, Bendszus and Kronlage. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Preisner, Fabian
Behnisch, Rouven
Schwehr, Véronique
Godel, Tim
Schwarz, Daniel
Foesleitner, Olivia
Bäumer, Philipp
Heiland, Sabine
Bendszus, Martin
Kronlage, Moritz
Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title_full Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title_fullStr Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title_short Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
title_sort quantitative mr-neurography at 3.0t: inter-scanner reproducibility
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316
work_keys_str_mv AT preisnerfabian quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT behnischrouven quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT schwehrveronique quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT godeltim quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT schwarzdaniel quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT foesleitnerolivia quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT baumerphilipp quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT heilandsabine quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT bendszusmartin quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility
AT kronlagemoritz quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility