Cargando…
Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility
BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parame...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316 |
_version_ | 1784661270309371904 |
---|---|
author | Preisner, Fabian Behnisch, Rouven Schwehr, Véronique Godel, Tim Schwarz, Daniel Foesleitner, Olivia Bäumer, Philipp Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Kronlage, Moritz |
author_facet | Preisner, Fabian Behnisch, Rouven Schwehr, Véronique Godel, Tim Schwarz, Daniel Foesleitner, Olivia Bäumer, Philipp Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Kronlage, Moritz |
author_sort | Preisner, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parameters of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively examined at three different 3.0T MR scanners and underwent MRN of their sciatic nerve using comparable imaging protocols including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T2 relaxometry. Subsequently, inter-scanner agreement was assessed for seven different parameters by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: Assessment of inter-scanner reliability revealed good to excellent agreement for T2 (ICC: 0.846) and the quantitative DTI parameters, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) (ICC: 0.876), whereas moderate agreement was observed for proton spin density (PD) (ICC: 0.51). Analysis of variance identified significant inter-scanner differences for several parameters, such as FA (p < 0.001; p = 0.02), T2 (p < 0.01) and PD (p = 0.02; p < 0.01; p = 0.02). Calculated SEM values were mostly within the range of one standard deviation of the absolute mean values, for example 0.033 for FA, 4.12 ms for T2 and 27.8 for PD. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the measurement imprecision for peripheral nerve DTI and T2 relaxometry, which is associated with the use of different MR scanners. The here presented values may serve as an orientation of the possible scanner-associated fluctuations of MRN biomarkers, which can occur under similar conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8888927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88889272022-03-03 Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility Preisner, Fabian Behnisch, Rouven Schwehr, Véronique Godel, Tim Schwarz, Daniel Foesleitner, Olivia Bäumer, Philipp Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Kronlage, Moritz Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Quantitative MR-neurography (MRN) is increasingly applied, however, the impact of the MR-scanner on the derived parameters is unknown. Here, we used different 3.0T MR scanners and applied comparable MR-sequences in order to quantify the inter-scanner reproducibility of various MRN parameters of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively examined at three different 3.0T MR scanners and underwent MRN of their sciatic nerve using comparable imaging protocols including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T2 relaxometry. Subsequently, inter-scanner agreement was assessed for seven different parameters by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: Assessment of inter-scanner reliability revealed good to excellent agreement for T2 (ICC: 0.846) and the quantitative DTI parameters, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) (ICC: 0.876), whereas moderate agreement was observed for proton spin density (PD) (ICC: 0.51). Analysis of variance identified significant inter-scanner differences for several parameters, such as FA (p < 0.001; p = 0.02), T2 (p < 0.01) and PD (p = 0.02; p < 0.01; p = 0.02). Calculated SEM values were mostly within the range of one standard deviation of the absolute mean values, for example 0.033 for FA, 4.12 ms for T2 and 27.8 for PD. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the measurement imprecision for peripheral nerve DTI and T2 relaxometry, which is associated with the use of different MR scanners. The here presented values may serve as an orientation of the possible scanner-associated fluctuations of MRN biomarkers, which can occur under similar conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8888927/ /pubmed/35250457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316 Text en Copyright © 2022 Preisner, Behnisch, Schwehr, Godel, Schwarz, Foesleitner, Bäumer, Heiland, Bendszus and Kronlage. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Preisner, Fabian Behnisch, Rouven Schwehr, Véronique Godel, Tim Schwarz, Daniel Foesleitner, Olivia Bäumer, Philipp Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Kronlage, Moritz Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title | Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title_full | Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title_fullStr | Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title_short | Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility |
title_sort | quantitative mr-neurography at 3.0t: inter-scanner reproducibility |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.817316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT preisnerfabian quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT behnischrouven quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT schwehrveronique quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT godeltim quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT schwarzdaniel quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT foesleitnerolivia quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT baumerphilipp quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT heilandsabine quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT bendszusmartin quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility AT kronlagemoritz quantitativemrneurographyat30tinterscannerreproducibility |