Cargando…

Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials

Working trials is a canine discipline that originated from police and military dog work. One aspect of working trials competition is for a dog to “scale” a 6ft high wooden wall. Concern has been raised in other canine disciplines that landing forces after traversing jumps may lead to soft tissue inj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Anne, Boyd, Jacqueline, Williams, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.742068
_version_ 1784661280486850560
author Carter, Anne
Boyd, Jacqueline
Williams, Ellen
author_facet Carter, Anne
Boyd, Jacqueline
Williams, Ellen
author_sort Carter, Anne
collection PubMed
description Working trials is a canine discipline that originated from police and military dog work. One aspect of working trials competition is for a dog to “scale” a 6ft high wooden wall. Concern has been raised in other canine disciplines that landing forces after traversing jumps may lead to soft tissue injuries. There is a paucity of research into the impact of scale height on peak vertical landing force (PVF) in dogs participating in working trials. The aim of this work was to determine whether an alteration in scale height impacts PVF and apparent joint angulation on landing. Twenty-one dogs who regularly competed in working trials traversed the scale at three different heights; 6ft (full height), 5.5ft and 5ft. Changes in PVF, apparent carpal and shoulder joint angulation and duration of landing were analyzed using general linear mixed models. Dogs weighing >25 kg had greater PVF at 6ft than at 5ft (p < 0.05). There was no effect of scale height on PVF in dogs <25kg. Duration of landing was longer at 5ft than 5.5ft (p < 0.001) and 6ft (p < 0.001). Apparent carpus angle on landing was smaller at 6ft than 5ft (p < 0.05) and 5.5ft (p < 0.05) for dogs <25 kg. Apparent carpus angle on landing did not differ at any height for dogs >25 kg (p > 0.05). Apparent shoulder angle was not affected by scale height for any dogs (p > 0.05). There was considerable variation in the study population, but this research indicates that when the scale height was lowered to 5.5ft dogs had reduced PVF and less compressed joint angles on landing. When the scale height was lowered to 5ft they altered their traversing style and greater compression and increased PVF was seen. Evidence-based approaches to canine working trials are important to ensure minimum impacts on physical health and welfare of participating dogs, in terms of risk of injury in both competition and training. Based on these findings it is recommended that the maximum height of the scale is reviewed for training and competitive purposes, to ensure minimal impacts on the health of competing dogs, while maintaining the level of competitive challenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8888967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88889672022-03-03 Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials Carter, Anne Boyd, Jacqueline Williams, Ellen Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Working trials is a canine discipline that originated from police and military dog work. One aspect of working trials competition is for a dog to “scale” a 6ft high wooden wall. Concern has been raised in other canine disciplines that landing forces after traversing jumps may lead to soft tissue injuries. There is a paucity of research into the impact of scale height on peak vertical landing force (PVF) in dogs participating in working trials. The aim of this work was to determine whether an alteration in scale height impacts PVF and apparent joint angulation on landing. Twenty-one dogs who regularly competed in working trials traversed the scale at three different heights; 6ft (full height), 5.5ft and 5ft. Changes in PVF, apparent carpal and shoulder joint angulation and duration of landing were analyzed using general linear mixed models. Dogs weighing >25 kg had greater PVF at 6ft than at 5ft (p < 0.05). There was no effect of scale height on PVF in dogs <25kg. Duration of landing was longer at 5ft than 5.5ft (p < 0.001) and 6ft (p < 0.001). Apparent carpus angle on landing was smaller at 6ft than 5ft (p < 0.05) and 5.5ft (p < 0.05) for dogs <25 kg. Apparent carpus angle on landing did not differ at any height for dogs >25 kg (p > 0.05). Apparent shoulder angle was not affected by scale height for any dogs (p > 0.05). There was considerable variation in the study population, but this research indicates that when the scale height was lowered to 5.5ft dogs had reduced PVF and less compressed joint angles on landing. When the scale height was lowered to 5ft they altered their traversing style and greater compression and increased PVF was seen. Evidence-based approaches to canine working trials are important to ensure minimum impacts on physical health and welfare of participating dogs, in terms of risk of injury in both competition and training. Based on these findings it is recommended that the maximum height of the scale is reviewed for training and competitive purposes, to ensure minimal impacts on the health of competing dogs, while maintaining the level of competitive challenge. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8888967/ /pubmed/35252411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.742068 Text en Copyright © 2022 Carter, Boyd and Williams. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Carter, Anne
Boyd, Jacqueline
Williams, Ellen
Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title_full Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title_fullStr Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title_short Understanding the Impact of Scale Height on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Dogs in Working Trials
title_sort understanding the impact of scale height on the kinetics and kinematics of dogs in working trials
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8888967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.742068
work_keys_str_mv AT carteranne understandingtheimpactofscaleheightonthekineticsandkinematicsofdogsinworkingtrials
AT boydjacqueline understandingtheimpactofscaleheightonthekineticsandkinematicsofdogsinworkingtrials
AT williamsellen understandingtheimpactofscaleheightonthekineticsandkinematicsofdogsinworkingtrials