Cargando…

Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling

Murine slowly adapting receptors (SARs) within airway smooth muscle provide volume-related feedback; however, their mechanosensitivity and morphology are incompletely characterized. We explored two aspects of SAR physiology: their inherent static mechanosensitivity and a potential link to pulmonary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domnik, Nicolle J., Vincent, Sandra G., Fisher, John T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.833665
_version_ 1784661302266822656
author Domnik, Nicolle J.
Vincent, Sandra G.
Fisher, John T.
author_facet Domnik, Nicolle J.
Vincent, Sandra G.
Fisher, John T.
author_sort Domnik, Nicolle J.
collection PubMed
description Murine slowly adapting receptors (SARs) within airway smooth muscle provide volume-related feedback; however, their mechanosensitivity and morphology are incompletely characterized. We explored two aspects of SAR physiology: their inherent static mechanosensitivity and a potential link to pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies (NEBs). SAR mechanosensitivity displays a rate sensitivity linked to speed of inflation; however, to what extent static SAR mechanosensitivity is tuned for the very rapid breathing frequency (B(f)) of small mammals (e.g., mouse) is unclear. NEB-associated, morphologically described smooth muscle-associated receptors (SMARs) may be a structural analog for functionally characterized SARs, suggesting functional linkages between SARs and NEBs. We addressed the hypotheses that: (1) rapid murine B(f) is associated with enhanced in vivo SAR static sensitivity; (2) if SARs and NEBs are functionally linked, stimuli reported to impact NEB function would alter SAR mechanosensitivity. We measured SAR action potential discharge frequency (AP f, action potentials/s) during quasi-static inflation [0–20 cmH(2)O trans-respiratory pressure (P(TR))] in NEB-relevant conditions of hypoxia (F(I)O(2) = 0.1), hypercarbia (F(I)CO(2) = 0.1), and pharmacologic intervention (serotonergic 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, Tropisetron, 4.5 mg/kg; P2 purinergic receptor antagonist, Suramin, 50 mg/kg). In all protocols, we obtained: (1) AP f vs. P(TR); (2) P(TR) threshold; and (3) AP f onset at P(TR) threshold. The murine AP f vs. P(TR) response comprises high AP f (average maximum AP f: 236.1 ± 11.1 AP/s at 20 cmH(2)O), a low P(TR) threshold (mean 2.0 ± 0.1 cmH(2)O), and a plateau in AP f between 15 and 20 cmH(2)O. Murine SAR mechanosensitivity (AP f vs. P(TR)) is up to 60% greater than that reported for larger mammals. Even the maximum difference between intervention and control conditions was minimally impacted by NEB-related alterations: Tropisetron −7.6 ± 1.8% (p = 0.005); Suramin −10.6 ± 1.5% (p = 0.01); hypoxia +9.3 ± 1.9% (p < 0.001); and hypercarbia −6.2 ± 0.9% (p < 0.001). We conclude that the high sensitivity of murine SARs to inflation provides enhanced resolution of operating lung volume, which is aligned with the rapid B(f) of the mouse. We found minimal evidence supporting a functional link between SARs and NEBs and speculate that the <10% change in SAR mechanosensitivity during altered NEB-related stimuli is not consistent with a meaningful physiologic role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8889033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88890332022-03-03 Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling Domnik, Nicolle J. Vincent, Sandra G. Fisher, John T. Front Physiol Physiology Murine slowly adapting receptors (SARs) within airway smooth muscle provide volume-related feedback; however, their mechanosensitivity and morphology are incompletely characterized. We explored two aspects of SAR physiology: their inherent static mechanosensitivity and a potential link to pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies (NEBs). SAR mechanosensitivity displays a rate sensitivity linked to speed of inflation; however, to what extent static SAR mechanosensitivity is tuned for the very rapid breathing frequency (B(f)) of small mammals (e.g., mouse) is unclear. NEB-associated, morphologically described smooth muscle-associated receptors (SMARs) may be a structural analog for functionally characterized SARs, suggesting functional linkages between SARs and NEBs. We addressed the hypotheses that: (1) rapid murine B(f) is associated with enhanced in vivo SAR static sensitivity; (2) if SARs and NEBs are functionally linked, stimuli reported to impact NEB function would alter SAR mechanosensitivity. We measured SAR action potential discharge frequency (AP f, action potentials/s) during quasi-static inflation [0–20 cmH(2)O trans-respiratory pressure (P(TR))] in NEB-relevant conditions of hypoxia (F(I)O(2) = 0.1), hypercarbia (F(I)CO(2) = 0.1), and pharmacologic intervention (serotonergic 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, Tropisetron, 4.5 mg/kg; P2 purinergic receptor antagonist, Suramin, 50 mg/kg). In all protocols, we obtained: (1) AP f vs. P(TR); (2) P(TR) threshold; and (3) AP f onset at P(TR) threshold. The murine AP f vs. P(TR) response comprises high AP f (average maximum AP f: 236.1 ± 11.1 AP/s at 20 cmH(2)O), a low P(TR) threshold (mean 2.0 ± 0.1 cmH(2)O), and a plateau in AP f between 15 and 20 cmH(2)O. Murine SAR mechanosensitivity (AP f vs. P(TR)) is up to 60% greater than that reported for larger mammals. Even the maximum difference between intervention and control conditions was minimally impacted by NEB-related alterations: Tropisetron −7.6 ± 1.8% (p = 0.005); Suramin −10.6 ± 1.5% (p = 0.01); hypoxia +9.3 ± 1.9% (p < 0.001); and hypercarbia −6.2 ± 0.9% (p < 0.001). We conclude that the high sensitivity of murine SARs to inflation provides enhanced resolution of operating lung volume, which is aligned with the rapid B(f) of the mouse. We found minimal evidence supporting a functional link between SARs and NEBs and speculate that the <10% change in SAR mechanosensitivity during altered NEB-related stimuli is not consistent with a meaningful physiologic role. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8889033/ /pubmed/35250636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.833665 Text en Copyright © 2022 Domnik, Vincent and Fisher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Domnik, Nicolle J.
Vincent, Sandra G.
Fisher, John T.
Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title_full Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title_fullStr Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title_full_unstemmed Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title_short Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling
title_sort mechanosensitivity of murine lung slowly adapting receptors: minimal impact of chemosensory, serotonergic, and purinergic signaling
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.833665
work_keys_str_mv AT domniknicollej mechanosensitivityofmurinelungslowlyadaptingreceptorsminimalimpactofchemosensoryserotonergicandpurinergicsignaling
AT vincentsandrag mechanosensitivityofmurinelungslowlyadaptingreceptorsminimalimpactofchemosensoryserotonergicandpurinergicsignaling
AT fisherjohnt mechanosensitivityofmurinelungslowlyadaptingreceptorsminimalimpactofchemosensoryserotonergicandpurinergicsignaling