Cargando…

Digging deeper into colonial palaeontological practices in modern day Mexico and Brazil

Scientific practices stemming from colonialism, whereby middle- and low-income countries supply data for high-income countries and the contributions of local expertise are devalued, are still prevalent today in the field of palaeontology. In response to these unjust practices, countries such as Mexi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cisneros, Juan Carlos, Raja, Nussaïbah B., Ghilardi, Aline M., Dunne, Emma M., Pinheiro, Felipe L., Regalado Fernández, Omar Rafael, Sales, Marcos A. F., Rodríguez-de la Rosa, Rubén A., Miranda-Martínez, Adriana Y., González-Mora, Sergio, Bantim, Renan A. M., de Lima, Flaviana J., Pardo, Jason D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210898
Descripción
Sumario:Scientific practices stemming from colonialism, whereby middle- and low-income countries supply data for high-income countries and the contributions of local expertise are devalued, are still prevalent today in the field of palaeontology. In response to these unjust practices, countries such as Mexico and Brazil adopted protective laws and regulations during the twentieth century to preserve their palaeontological heritage. However, scientific colonialism is still reflected in many publications describing fossil specimens recovered from these countries. Here, we present examples of ‘palaeontological colonialism’ from publications on Jurassic–Cretaceous fossils from NE Mexico and NE Brazil spanning the last three decades. Common issues that we identified in these publications are the absence of both fieldwork and export permit declarations and the lack of local experts among authorships. In Mexico, access to many fossil specimens is restricted on account of these specimens being housed in private collections, whereas a high number of studies on Brazilian fossils are based on specimens illegally reposited in foreign collections, particularly in Germany and Japan. Finally, we outline and discuss the wider academic and social impacts of these research practices, and propose exhaustive recommendations to scientists, journals, museums, research institutions and government and funding agencies in order to overcome these practices.