Cargando…

‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention

Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straw, Edward A., Thompson, Linzi J., Leadbeater, Ellouise, Brown, Mark J. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353
_version_ 1784661344178405376
author Straw, Edward A.
Thompson, Linzi J.
Leadbeater, Ellouise
Brown, Mark J. F.
author_facet Straw, Edward A.
Thompson, Linzi J.
Leadbeater, Ellouise
Brown, Mark J. F.
author_sort Straw, Edward A.
collection PubMed
description Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients. This reflects the assumption that ‘inert’ ingredients are non-toxic. A review of relevant research shows that for bees, this assumption is without empirical foundation. After conducting a systematic literature search, we found just 19 studies that tested the effects of ‘inert’ ingredients on bee health. In these studies, ‘inert’ ingredients were found to cause mortality in bees through multiple exposure routes, act synergistically with other stressors and cause colony level effects. This lack of research is compounded by a lack of diversity in study organism used. We argue that ‘inert’ ingredients have distinct, and poorly understood, ecological persistency profiles and toxicities, making research into their individual effects necessary. We highlight the lack of mitigation in place to protect bees from ‘inert’ ingredients and argue that research efforts should be redistributed to address the knowledge gap identified here. If so-called ‘inert’ ingredients are, in fact, detrimental to bee health, their potential role in widespread bee declines needs urgent assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8889201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88892012022-03-25 ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention Straw, Edward A. Thompson, Linzi J. Leadbeater, Ellouise Brown, Mark J. F. Proc Biol Sci Evidence Synthesis Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients. This reflects the assumption that ‘inert’ ingredients are non-toxic. A review of relevant research shows that for bees, this assumption is without empirical foundation. After conducting a systematic literature search, we found just 19 studies that tested the effects of ‘inert’ ingredients on bee health. In these studies, ‘inert’ ingredients were found to cause mortality in bees through multiple exposure routes, act synergistically with other stressors and cause colony level effects. This lack of research is compounded by a lack of diversity in study organism used. We argue that ‘inert’ ingredients have distinct, and poorly understood, ecological persistency profiles and toxicities, making research into their individual effects necessary. We highlight the lack of mitigation in place to protect bees from ‘inert’ ingredients and argue that research efforts should be redistributed to address the knowledge gap identified here. If so-called ‘inert’ ingredients are, in fact, detrimental to bee health, their potential role in widespread bee declines needs urgent assessment. The Royal Society 2022-03-09 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8889201/ /pubmed/35232234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evidence Synthesis
Straw, Edward A.
Thompson, Linzi J.
Leadbeater, Ellouise
Brown, Mark J. F.
‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title_full ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title_fullStr ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title_full_unstemmed ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title_short ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
title_sort ‘inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
topic Evidence Synthesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353
work_keys_str_mv AT strawedwarda inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention
AT thompsonlinzij inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention
AT leadbeaterellouise inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention
AT brownmarkjf inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention