Cargando…
‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention
Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353 |
_version_ | 1784661344178405376 |
---|---|
author | Straw, Edward A. Thompson, Linzi J. Leadbeater, Ellouise Brown, Mark J. F. |
author_facet | Straw, Edward A. Thompson, Linzi J. Leadbeater, Ellouise Brown, Mark J. F. |
author_sort | Straw, Edward A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients. This reflects the assumption that ‘inert’ ingredients are non-toxic. A review of relevant research shows that for bees, this assumption is without empirical foundation. After conducting a systematic literature search, we found just 19 studies that tested the effects of ‘inert’ ingredients on bee health. In these studies, ‘inert’ ingredients were found to cause mortality in bees through multiple exposure routes, act synergistically with other stressors and cause colony level effects. This lack of research is compounded by a lack of diversity in study organism used. We argue that ‘inert’ ingredients have distinct, and poorly understood, ecological persistency profiles and toxicities, making research into their individual effects necessary. We highlight the lack of mitigation in place to protect bees from ‘inert’ ingredients and argue that research efforts should be redistributed to address the knowledge gap identified here. If so-called ‘inert’ ingredients are, in fact, detrimental to bee health, their potential role in widespread bee declines needs urgent assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8889201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88892012022-03-25 ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention Straw, Edward A. Thompson, Linzi J. Leadbeater, Ellouise Brown, Mark J. F. Proc Biol Sci Evidence Synthesis Agrochemical formulations are composed of two broad groups of chemicals: active ingredients, which confer pest control action, and ‘inert’ ingredients, which facilitate the action of the active ingredient. Most research into the effects of agrochemicals focusses on the effects of active ingredients. This reflects the assumption that ‘inert’ ingredients are non-toxic. A review of relevant research shows that for bees, this assumption is without empirical foundation. After conducting a systematic literature search, we found just 19 studies that tested the effects of ‘inert’ ingredients on bee health. In these studies, ‘inert’ ingredients were found to cause mortality in bees through multiple exposure routes, act synergistically with other stressors and cause colony level effects. This lack of research is compounded by a lack of diversity in study organism used. We argue that ‘inert’ ingredients have distinct, and poorly understood, ecological persistency profiles and toxicities, making research into their individual effects necessary. We highlight the lack of mitigation in place to protect bees from ‘inert’ ingredients and argue that research efforts should be redistributed to address the knowledge gap identified here. If so-called ‘inert’ ingredients are, in fact, detrimental to bee health, their potential role in widespread bee declines needs urgent assessment. The Royal Society 2022-03-09 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8889201/ /pubmed/35232234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Synthesis Straw, Edward A. Thompson, Linzi J. Leadbeater, Ellouise Brown, Mark J. F. ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title | ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title_full | ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title_fullStr | ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title_short | ‘Inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
title_sort | ‘inert’ ingredients are understudied, potentially dangerous to bees and deserve more research attention |
topic | Evidence Synthesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strawedwarda inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention AT thompsonlinzij inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention AT leadbeaterellouise inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention AT brownmarkjf inertingredientsareunderstudiedpotentiallydangeroustobeesanddeservemoreresearchattention |