Cargando…

Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study

BACKGROUND: The benefits of school doctor interventions conducted at routine general health checks remain insufficiently studied. This study explored the associations of school doctor interventions with the doctor-evaluated and parent-evaluated benefits of routine health checks. METHODS: Between Aug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikander, Kirsi, Kosola, Silja, Vahlberg, Tero, Kaila, Minna, Hermanson, Elina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001394
_version_ 1784661383085817856
author Nikander, Kirsi
Kosola, Silja
Vahlberg, Tero
Kaila, Minna
Hermanson, Elina
author_facet Nikander, Kirsi
Kosola, Silja
Vahlberg, Tero
Kaila, Minna
Hermanson, Elina
author_sort Nikander, Kirsi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefits of school doctor interventions conducted at routine general health checks remain insufficiently studied. This study explored the associations of school doctor interventions with the doctor-evaluated and parent-evaluated benefits of routine health checks. METHODS: Between August 2017 and August 2018, we recruited a random sample of 1341 children from grades 1 and 5 from 21 Finnish elementary schools in 4 municipalities. Doctors routinely examined all children, who were accompanied by parents. The doctor-reported interventions were categorised into six groups: instructions and/or significant discussions, prescriptions, laboratory tests and/or medical imaging, scheduling of follow-up appointments, referrals to other professionals and referrals to specialised care. Doctors evaluated the benefit of the appointment using predetermined criteria, and parents provided their subjective perceptions of benefit. Interventions and reported benefit were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Doctors reported 52% and parents 87% of the appointments with interventions beneficial. All interventions were independently associated with doctor-evaluated benefit (ORs: 1.91–17.26). Receiving any intervention during the appointment was associated with parent-evaluated benefit (OR: 3.25, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.75). In analyses of different interventions, instructions and/or significant discussions (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.44), prescriptions (OR: 7.44, 95% CI 2.32 to 23.91) and laboratory tests and/or medical imaging (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.55) were associated with parent-evaluated benefit. Scheduled follow-up appointments and referrals to other professionals showed no significant association with parent-evaluated benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors and parents valued the appointments with interventions. Parents especially appreciated immediate help and testing from the doctor. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03178331.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8889353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88893532022-03-17 Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study Nikander, Kirsi Kosola, Silja Vahlberg, Tero Kaila, Minna Hermanson, Elina BMJ Paediatr Open Health Service BACKGROUND: The benefits of school doctor interventions conducted at routine general health checks remain insufficiently studied. This study explored the associations of school doctor interventions with the doctor-evaluated and parent-evaluated benefits of routine health checks. METHODS: Between August 2017 and August 2018, we recruited a random sample of 1341 children from grades 1 and 5 from 21 Finnish elementary schools in 4 municipalities. Doctors routinely examined all children, who were accompanied by parents. The doctor-reported interventions were categorised into six groups: instructions and/or significant discussions, prescriptions, laboratory tests and/or medical imaging, scheduling of follow-up appointments, referrals to other professionals and referrals to specialised care. Doctors evaluated the benefit of the appointment using predetermined criteria, and parents provided their subjective perceptions of benefit. Interventions and reported benefit were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Doctors reported 52% and parents 87% of the appointments with interventions beneficial. All interventions were independently associated with doctor-evaluated benefit (ORs: 1.91–17.26). Receiving any intervention during the appointment was associated with parent-evaluated benefit (OR: 3.25, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.75). In analyses of different interventions, instructions and/or significant discussions (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.44), prescriptions (OR: 7.44, 95% CI 2.32 to 23.91) and laboratory tests and/or medical imaging (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.55) were associated with parent-evaluated benefit. Scheduled follow-up appointments and referrals to other professionals showed no significant association with parent-evaluated benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors and parents valued the appointments with interventions. Parents especially appreciated immediate help and testing from the doctor. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03178331. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8889353/ /pubmed/36053658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001394 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Service
Nikander, Kirsi
Kosola, Silja
Vahlberg, Tero
Kaila, Minna
Hermanson, Elina
Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title_full Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title_fullStr Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title_short Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
title_sort associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study
topic Health Service
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001394
work_keys_str_mv AT nikanderkirsi associatingschooldoctorinterventionswiththebenefitofthehealthcheckanobservationalstudy
AT kosolasilja associatingschooldoctorinterventionswiththebenefitofthehealthcheckanobservationalstudy
AT vahlbergtero associatingschooldoctorinterventionswiththebenefitofthehealthcheckanobservationalstudy
AT kailaminna associatingschooldoctorinterventionswiththebenefitofthehealthcheckanobservationalstudy
AT hermansonelina associatingschooldoctorinterventionswiththebenefitofthehealthcheckanobservationalstudy