Cargando…
Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w |
_version_ | 1784661460161396736 |
---|---|
author | Boyer, Marie S. Widmer, Daniel Cohidon, Christine Desvergne, Béatrice Cornuz, Jacques Guessous, Idris Cerqui, Daniela |
author_facet | Boyer, Marie S. Widmer, Daniel Cohidon, Christine Desvergne, Béatrice Cornuz, Jacques Guessous, Idris Cerqui, Daniela |
author_sort | Boyer, Marie S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of doctors and their patients in response to this evolving concept. This present article focuses on the general understanding of personalised medicine, underlining the confusion over the concept. METHODS: Semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners (GPs) and 10 of their patients. The purposive sampling took into account the doctor’s age, sex, and place of practice (rural/urban); each doctor recruited one patient of the same age and sex. Each interview began with the same open-ended question about the participant’s knowledge of the topic, after which a working definition was provided to continue the discussion. Using the grounded theory method, the analysis consisted of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. RESULTS: From our present analysis focusing on the general understanding of PM, three main themes representing the concept emerged. The first two representations being “centred on the person as a whole” and “focused on alternative and complementary methods”, in which the therapeutic relationship was stated as key. The third theme “medicine open to innovation” involved the few participants who had a good understanding of the concept and could associate personalised medicine with genomics. For those who value therapeutic relationship, the risks of accepting innovation could result in “fast-food” medicine and interpersonal barriers. DISCUSSION: PM is predominantly unfamiliar in family medicine. It is misinterpreted as a holistic or integrative type of medicine. This semantic confusion probably lies in the choice of the label “personalised” or from the lack of a uniform definition for the term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8889694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88896942022-03-09 Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis Boyer, Marie S. Widmer, Daniel Cohidon, Christine Desvergne, Béatrice Cornuz, Jacques Guessous, Idris Cerqui, Daniela BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of doctors and their patients in response to this evolving concept. This present article focuses on the general understanding of personalised medicine, underlining the confusion over the concept. METHODS: Semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners (GPs) and 10 of their patients. The purposive sampling took into account the doctor’s age, sex, and place of practice (rural/urban); each doctor recruited one patient of the same age and sex. Each interview began with the same open-ended question about the participant’s knowledge of the topic, after which a working definition was provided to continue the discussion. Using the grounded theory method, the analysis consisted of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. RESULTS: From our present analysis focusing on the general understanding of PM, three main themes representing the concept emerged. The first two representations being “centred on the person as a whole” and “focused on alternative and complementary methods”, in which the therapeutic relationship was stated as key. The third theme “medicine open to innovation” involved the few participants who had a good understanding of the concept and could associate personalised medicine with genomics. For those who value therapeutic relationship, the risks of accepting innovation could result in “fast-food” medicine and interpersonal barriers. DISCUSSION: PM is predominantly unfamiliar in family medicine. It is misinterpreted as a holistic or integrative type of medicine. This semantic confusion probably lies in the choice of the label “personalised” or from the lack of a uniform definition for the term. BioMed Central 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8889694/ /pubmed/35232380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Boyer, Marie S. Widmer, Daniel Cohidon, Christine Desvergne, Béatrice Cornuz, Jacques Guessous, Idris Cerqui, Daniela Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title | Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title_full | Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title_fullStr | Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title_short | Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
title_sort | representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boyermaries representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT widmerdaniel representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT cohidonchristine representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT desvergnebeatrice representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT cornuzjacques representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT guessousidris representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis AT cerquidaniela representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis |