Cargando…

Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyer, Marie S., Widmer, Daniel, Cohidon, Christine, Desvergne, Béatrice, Cornuz, Jacques, Guessous, Idris, Cerqui, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w
_version_ 1784661460161396736
author Boyer, Marie S.
Widmer, Daniel
Cohidon, Christine
Desvergne, Béatrice
Cornuz, Jacques
Guessous, Idris
Cerqui, Daniela
author_facet Boyer, Marie S.
Widmer, Daniel
Cohidon, Christine
Desvergne, Béatrice
Cornuz, Jacques
Guessous, Idris
Cerqui, Daniela
author_sort Boyer, Marie S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of doctors and their patients in response to this evolving concept. This present article focuses on the general understanding of personalised medicine, underlining the confusion over the concept. METHODS: Semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners (GPs) and 10 of their patients. The purposive sampling took into account the doctor’s age, sex, and place of practice (rural/urban); each doctor recruited one patient of the same age and sex. Each interview began with the same open-ended question about the participant’s knowledge of the topic, after which a working definition was provided to continue the discussion. Using the grounded theory method, the analysis consisted of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. RESULTS: From our present analysis focusing on the general understanding of PM, three main themes representing the concept emerged. The first two representations being “centred on the person as a whole” and “focused on alternative and complementary methods”, in which the therapeutic relationship was stated as key. The third theme “medicine open to innovation” involved the few participants who had a good understanding of the concept and could associate personalised medicine with genomics. For those who value therapeutic relationship, the risks of accepting innovation could result in “fast-food” medicine and interpersonal barriers. DISCUSSION: PM is predominantly unfamiliar in family medicine. It is misinterpreted as a holistic or integrative type of medicine. This semantic confusion probably lies in the choice of the label “personalised” or from the lack of a uniform definition for the term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8889694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88896942022-03-09 Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis Boyer, Marie S. Widmer, Daniel Cohidon, Christine Desvergne, Béatrice Cornuz, Jacques Guessous, Idris Cerqui, Daniela BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of doctors and their patients in response to this evolving concept. This present article focuses on the general understanding of personalised medicine, underlining the confusion over the concept. METHODS: Semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners (GPs) and 10 of their patients. The purposive sampling took into account the doctor’s age, sex, and place of practice (rural/urban); each doctor recruited one patient of the same age and sex. Each interview began with the same open-ended question about the participant’s knowledge of the topic, after which a working definition was provided to continue the discussion. Using the grounded theory method, the analysis consisted of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. RESULTS: From our present analysis focusing on the general understanding of PM, three main themes representing the concept emerged. The first two representations being “centred on the person as a whole” and “focused on alternative and complementary methods”, in which the therapeutic relationship was stated as key. The third theme “medicine open to innovation” involved the few participants who had a good understanding of the concept and could associate personalised medicine with genomics. For those who value therapeutic relationship, the risks of accepting innovation could result in “fast-food” medicine and interpersonal barriers. DISCUSSION: PM is predominantly unfamiliar in family medicine. It is misinterpreted as a holistic or integrative type of medicine. This semantic confusion probably lies in the choice of the label “personalised” or from the lack of a uniform definition for the term. BioMed Central 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8889694/ /pubmed/35232380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Boyer, Marie S.
Widmer, Daniel
Cohidon, Christine
Desvergne, Béatrice
Cornuz, Jacques
Guessous, Idris
Cerqui, Daniela
Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title_full Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title_short Representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
title_sort representations of personalised medicine in family medicine: a qualitative analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35232380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01650-w
work_keys_str_mv AT boyermaries representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT widmerdaniel representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT cohidonchristine representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT desvergnebeatrice representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT cornuzjacques representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT guessousidris representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis
AT cerquidaniela representationsofpersonalisedmedicineinfamilymedicineaqualitativeanalysis