Cargando…

Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis

AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakanishi, Ryota, Fujimoto, Yoshiaki, Sugiyama, Masahiko, Hisamatsu, Yuichi, Nakanoko, Tomonori, Ando, Koji, Ota, Mitsuhiko, Kimura, Yasue, Oki, Eiji, Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516
_version_ 1784661505833172992
author Nakanishi, Ryota
Fujimoto, Yoshiaki
Sugiyama, Masahiko
Hisamatsu, Yuichi
Nakanoko, Tomonori
Ando, Koji
Ota, Mitsuhiko
Kimura, Yasue
Oki, Eiji
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
author_facet Nakanishi, Ryota
Fujimoto, Yoshiaki
Sugiyama, Masahiko
Hisamatsu, Yuichi
Nakanoko, Tomonori
Ando, Koji
Ota, Mitsuhiko
Kimura, Yasue
Oki, Eiji
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
author_sort Nakanishi, Ryota
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stapler. We also retrospectively analyzed the incidence of severe anastomotic leakage in 194 patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis using a double‐ or triple‐layered circular stapler during rectal cancer resection performed in two cancer centers between January 2015 and April 2021. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the bursting pressure was higher in anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler than the double‐layered stapler (end‐to‐end anastomosis: 26.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg vs 14.5 ± 4.3 mm Hg, P = .0031; side‐to‐side anastomosis: 27.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg vs 18.0 ± 2.9 mm Hg, P = .0275). Intersectional leakage occurred in 41% and 83% of anastomoses created using the triple‐ or double‐layered stapler, respectively (P = .0821). In the clinical cohort, the double‐ and triple‐layered stapler was used in 153 and 41 patients, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower for anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler vs the double‐layered stapler (0.0% vs 5.8%, P = .0362). In multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage were female sex (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.01‐0.90, P = .0354) and triple‐layered stapler usage (odds ratio: 0.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.00‐0.96, P = .0465). CONCLUSION: Anastomoses created using a triple‐layered circular stapler had high bursting pressure, which might contribute to a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8889859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88898592022-03-07 Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis Nakanishi, Ryota Fujimoto, Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Masahiko Hisamatsu, Yuichi Nakanoko, Tomonori Ando, Koji Ota, Mitsuhiko Kimura, Yasue Oki, Eiji Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stapler. We also retrospectively analyzed the incidence of severe anastomotic leakage in 194 patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis using a double‐ or triple‐layered circular stapler during rectal cancer resection performed in two cancer centers between January 2015 and April 2021. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the bursting pressure was higher in anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler than the double‐layered stapler (end‐to‐end anastomosis: 26.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg vs 14.5 ± 4.3 mm Hg, P = .0031; side‐to‐side anastomosis: 27.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg vs 18.0 ± 2.9 mm Hg, P = .0275). Intersectional leakage occurred in 41% and 83% of anastomoses created using the triple‐ or double‐layered stapler, respectively (P = .0821). In the clinical cohort, the double‐ and triple‐layered stapler was used in 153 and 41 patients, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower for anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler vs the double‐layered stapler (0.0% vs 5.8%, P = .0362). In multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage were female sex (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.01‐0.90, P = .0354) and triple‐layered stapler usage (odds ratio: 0.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.00‐0.96, P = .0465). CONCLUSION: Anastomoses created using a triple‐layered circular stapler had high bursting pressure, which might contribute to a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8889859/ /pubmed/35261951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nakanishi, Ryota
Fujimoto, Yoshiaki
Sugiyama, Masahiko
Hisamatsu, Yuichi
Nakanoko, Tomonori
Ando, Koji
Ota, Mitsuhiko
Kimura, Yasue
Oki, Eiji
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title_full Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title_fullStr Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title_short Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
title_sort clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanishiryota clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT fujimotoyoshiaki clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT sugiyamamasahiko clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT hisamatsuyuichi clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT nakanokotomonori clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT andokoji clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT otamitsuhiko clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT kimurayasue clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT okieiji clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT yoshizumitomoharu clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis