Cargando…
Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516 |
_version_ | 1784661505833172992 |
---|---|
author | Nakanishi, Ryota Fujimoto, Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Masahiko Hisamatsu, Yuichi Nakanoko, Tomonori Ando, Koji Ota, Mitsuhiko Kimura, Yasue Oki, Eiji Yoshizumi, Tomoharu |
author_facet | Nakanishi, Ryota Fujimoto, Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Masahiko Hisamatsu, Yuichi Nakanoko, Tomonori Ando, Koji Ota, Mitsuhiko Kimura, Yasue Oki, Eiji Yoshizumi, Tomoharu |
author_sort | Nakanishi, Ryota |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stapler. We also retrospectively analyzed the incidence of severe anastomotic leakage in 194 patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis using a double‐ or triple‐layered circular stapler during rectal cancer resection performed in two cancer centers between January 2015 and April 2021. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the bursting pressure was higher in anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler than the double‐layered stapler (end‐to‐end anastomosis: 26.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg vs 14.5 ± 4.3 mm Hg, P = .0031; side‐to‐side anastomosis: 27.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg vs 18.0 ± 2.9 mm Hg, P = .0275). Intersectional leakage occurred in 41% and 83% of anastomoses created using the triple‐ or double‐layered stapler, respectively (P = .0821). In the clinical cohort, the double‐ and triple‐layered stapler was used in 153 and 41 patients, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower for anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler vs the double‐layered stapler (0.0% vs 5.8%, P = .0362). In multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage were female sex (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.01‐0.90, P = .0354) and triple‐layered stapler usage (odds ratio: 0.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.00‐0.96, P = .0465). CONCLUSION: Anastomoses created using a triple‐layered circular stapler had high bursting pressure, which might contribute to a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8889859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88898592022-03-07 Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis Nakanishi, Ryota Fujimoto, Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Masahiko Hisamatsu, Yuichi Nakanoko, Tomonori Ando, Koji Ota, Mitsuhiko Kimura, Yasue Oki, Eiji Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: To investigate the impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler compared with the double‐layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double‐ or triple‐layered stapler. We also retrospectively analyzed the incidence of severe anastomotic leakage in 194 patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis using a double‐ or triple‐layered circular stapler during rectal cancer resection performed in two cancer centers between January 2015 and April 2021. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the bursting pressure was higher in anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler than the double‐layered stapler (end‐to‐end anastomosis: 26.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg vs 14.5 ± 4.3 mm Hg, P = .0031; side‐to‐side anastomosis: 27.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg vs 18.0 ± 2.9 mm Hg, P = .0275). Intersectional leakage occurred in 41% and 83% of anastomoses created using the triple‐ or double‐layered stapler, respectively (P = .0821). In the clinical cohort, the double‐ and triple‐layered stapler was used in 153 and 41 patients, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower for anastomoses created using the triple‐layered stapler vs the double‐layered stapler (0.0% vs 5.8%, P = .0362). In multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage were female sex (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.01‐0.90, P = .0354) and triple‐layered stapler usage (odds ratio: 0.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.00‐0.96, P = .0465). CONCLUSION: Anastomoses created using a triple‐layered circular stapler had high bursting pressure, which might contribute to a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8889859/ /pubmed/35261951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nakanishi, Ryota Fujimoto, Yoshiaki Sugiyama, Masahiko Hisamatsu, Yuichi Nakanoko, Tomonori Ando, Koji Ota, Mitsuhiko Kimura, Yasue Oki, Eiji Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title | Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full | Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title_short | Clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
title_sort | clinical impact of the triple‐layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakanishiryota clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT fujimotoyoshiaki clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT sugiyamamasahiko clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT hisamatsuyuichi clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT nakanokotomonori clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT andokoji clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT otamitsuhiko clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT kimurayasue clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT okieiji clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis AT yoshizumitomoharu clinicalimpactofthetriplelayeredcircularstaplerforreducingtheanastomoticleakageinrectalcancersurgeryporcinemodelandmulticenterretrospectivecohortanalysis |