Cargando…
The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008 |
_version_ | 1784661557279457280 |
---|---|
author | Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. Baker, George Hamilton Jackson, Lanier Ferguson, Brad Cain, Nicole |
author_facet | Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. Baker, George Hamilton Jackson, Lanier Ferguson, Brad Cain, Nicole |
author_sort | Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a single center’s experience in the use of this device in a pediatric cardiology clinic using a loan-based program. We also compare it to retrospective data from patients who received a traditional nonlooping event monitor. METHODS: Forty AliveCor Kardia monitor devices were purchased with grant support from the South Carolina TeleHealth Alliance. The devices were provided between June 2018 and August 2019 to patients presenting to the pediatric cardiology clinic who would have otherwise received a nonlooping event monitor. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who were given a MicroER nonlooping event monitor between May and December of 2017. RESULTS: Over a 15-month period, 65 patients were given the smartphone device. A total of 692 tracings were recorded by patients with 9 abnormal recordings. Of the devices expected to be returned, 35 devices have been returned to clinic (54%). Over an 8-month period, 61 patients received the traditional event monitors, accounting for a total of 142 transmissions with 3 abnormal transmissions. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal adequate use of the device with reliable tracings and show more frequent utilization of the smartphone-enabled device. Utilization of these devices in a loan-based program may improve access to care with improved methods to ensure return of the devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8890102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88901022022-03-08 The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. Baker, George Hamilton Jackson, Lanier Ferguson, Brad Cain, Nicole Cardiovasc Digit Health J Clinical BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a single center’s experience in the use of this device in a pediatric cardiology clinic using a loan-based program. We also compare it to retrospective data from patients who received a traditional nonlooping event monitor. METHODS: Forty AliveCor Kardia monitor devices were purchased with grant support from the South Carolina TeleHealth Alliance. The devices were provided between June 2018 and August 2019 to patients presenting to the pediatric cardiology clinic who would have otherwise received a nonlooping event monitor. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who were given a MicroER nonlooping event monitor between May and December of 2017. RESULTS: Over a 15-month period, 65 patients were given the smartphone device. A total of 692 tracings were recorded by patients with 9 abnormal recordings. Of the devices expected to be returned, 35 devices have been returned to clinic (54%). Over an 8-month period, 61 patients received the traditional event monitors, accounting for a total of 142 transmissions with 3 abnormal transmissions. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal adequate use of the device with reliable tracings and show more frequent utilization of the smartphone-enabled device. Utilization of these devices in a loan-based program may improve access to care with improved methods to ensure return of the devices. Elsevier 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8890102/ /pubmed/35265892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. Baker, George Hamilton Jackson, Lanier Ferguson, Brad Cain, Nicole The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title | The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title_full | The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title_fullStr | The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title_short | The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
title_sort | use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ecg device in the pediatric cardiology clinic |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almousilymohmmadf theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT bakergeorgehamilton theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT jacksonlanier theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT fergusonbrad theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT cainnicole theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT almousilymohmmadf useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT bakergeorgehamilton useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT jacksonlanier useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT fergusonbrad useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic AT cainnicole useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic |