Cargando…

The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic

BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-mousily, Mohmmad F., Baker, George Hamilton, Jackson, Lanier, Ferguson, Brad, Cain, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008
_version_ 1784661557279457280
author Al-mousily, Mohmmad F.
Baker, George Hamilton
Jackson, Lanier
Ferguson, Brad
Cain, Nicole
author_facet Al-mousily, Mohmmad F.
Baker, George Hamilton
Jackson, Lanier
Ferguson, Brad
Cain, Nicole
author_sort Al-mousily, Mohmmad F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a single center’s experience in the use of this device in a pediatric cardiology clinic using a loan-based program. We also compare it to retrospective data from patients who received a traditional nonlooping event monitor. METHODS: Forty AliveCor Kardia monitor devices were purchased with grant support from the South Carolina TeleHealth Alliance. The devices were provided between June 2018 and August 2019 to patients presenting to the pediatric cardiology clinic who would have otherwise received a nonlooping event monitor. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who were given a MicroER nonlooping event monitor between May and December of 2017. RESULTS: Over a 15-month period, 65 patients were given the smartphone device. A total of 692 tracings were recorded by patients with 9 abnormal recordings. Of the devices expected to be returned, 35 devices have been returned to clinic (54%). Over an 8-month period, 61 patients received the traditional event monitors, accounting for a total of 142 transmissions with 3 abnormal transmissions. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal adequate use of the device with reliable tracings and show more frequent utilization of the smartphone-enabled device. Utilization of these devices in a loan-based program may improve access to care with improved methods to ensure return of the devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8890102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88901022022-03-08 The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic Al-mousily, Mohmmad F. Baker, George Hamilton Jackson, Lanier Ferguson, Brad Cain, Nicole Cardiovasc Digit Health J Clinical BACKGROUND: A smartphone-enabled device has been developed that provides a single-lead electrocardiogram using a portable monitor. The increase in direct-to-consumer medical devices may lead to health disparities affecting members of socially disadvantaged populations. OBJECTIVE: Here we provide a single center’s experience in the use of this device in a pediatric cardiology clinic using a loan-based program. We also compare it to retrospective data from patients who received a traditional nonlooping event monitor. METHODS: Forty AliveCor Kardia monitor devices were purchased with grant support from the South Carolina TeleHealth Alliance. The devices were provided between June 2018 and August 2019 to patients presenting to the pediatric cardiology clinic who would have otherwise received a nonlooping event monitor. A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who were given a MicroER nonlooping event monitor between May and December of 2017. RESULTS: Over a 15-month period, 65 patients were given the smartphone device. A total of 692 tracings were recorded by patients with 9 abnormal recordings. Of the devices expected to be returned, 35 devices have been returned to clinic (54%). Over an 8-month period, 61 patients received the traditional event monitors, accounting for a total of 142 transmissions with 3 abnormal transmissions. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal adequate use of the device with reliable tracings and show more frequent utilization of the smartphone-enabled device. Utilization of these devices in a loan-based program may improve access to care with improved methods to ensure return of the devices. Elsevier 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8890102/ /pubmed/35265892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Al-mousily, Mohmmad F.
Baker, George Hamilton
Jackson, Lanier
Ferguson, Brad
Cain, Nicole
The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title_full The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title_fullStr The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title_full_unstemmed The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title_short The use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ECG device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
title_sort use of a traditional nonlooping event monitor versus a loan-based program with a smartphone ecg device in the pediatric cardiology clinic
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.008
work_keys_str_mv AT almousilymohmmadf theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT bakergeorgehamilton theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT jacksonlanier theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT fergusonbrad theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT cainnicole theuseofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT almousilymohmmadf useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT bakergeorgehamilton useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT jacksonlanier useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT fergusonbrad useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic
AT cainnicole useofatraditionalnonloopingeventmonitorversusaloanbasedprogramwithasmartphoneecgdeviceinthepediatriccardiologyclinic