Cargando…
A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation
BACKGROUND: There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.005 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients’ platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF. RESULTS: We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%–94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, P = .03). There was no difference in emergency department visits or hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research. |
---|