Cargando…
Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005 |
_version_ | 1784661612171362304 |
---|---|
author | Jathanna, Nikesh Podlasek, Anna Sokol, Albert Auer, Dorothee Chen, Xin Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz |
author_facet | Jathanna, Nikesh Podlasek, Anna Sokol, Albert Auer, Dorothee Chen, Xin Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz |
author_sort | Jathanna, Nikesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess AI methodologies used for left ventricular scar identification in CMR, imaging sequences used for training, and its diagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, OpenDissertations, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore was undertaken to June 2021 for full-text publications assessing left ventricular scar identification algorithms. No pre-registration was undertaken. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to assess Dice Coefficient (DSC) overlap of learning vs predefined thresholding methods. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included for final review. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to predefined threshold models (0.616 vs 0.633, P = .14) but had higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Meta-analysis of 4 studies revealed standardized mean difference of 1.11; 95% confidence interval -0.16 to 2.38, P = .09, I(2) = 98% favoring learning methods. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of applying AI to the task of scar detection in CMR has been demonstrated, but model evaluation remains heterogenous. Progression toward clinical application requires detailed, transparent, standardized model comparison and increased model generalizability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8890335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88903352022-03-08 Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review Jathanna, Nikesh Podlasek, Anna Sokol, Albert Auer, Dorothee Chen, Xin Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz Cardiovasc Digit Health J Review BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess AI methodologies used for left ventricular scar identification in CMR, imaging sequences used for training, and its diagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, OpenDissertations, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore was undertaken to June 2021 for full-text publications assessing left ventricular scar identification algorithms. No pre-registration was undertaken. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to assess Dice Coefficient (DSC) overlap of learning vs predefined thresholding methods. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included for final review. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to predefined threshold models (0.616 vs 0.633, P = .14) but had higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Meta-analysis of 4 studies revealed standardized mean difference of 1.11; 95% confidence interval -0.16 to 2.38, P = .09, I(2) = 98% favoring learning methods. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of applying AI to the task of scar detection in CMR has been demonstrated, but model evaluation remains heterogenous. Progression toward clinical application requires detailed, transparent, standardized model comparison and increased model generalizability. Elsevier 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8890335/ /pubmed/35265922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Jathanna, Nikesh Podlasek, Anna Sokol, Albert Auer, Dorothee Chen, Xin Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title | Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title_full | Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title_short | Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review |
title_sort | diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jathannanikesh diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview AT podlasekanna diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview AT sokolalbert diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview AT auerdorothee diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview AT chenxin diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview AT jamilcopleyshahnaz diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview |