Cargando…

Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jathanna, Nikesh, Podlasek, Anna, Sokol, Albert, Auer, Dorothee, Chen, Xin, Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005
_version_ 1784661612171362304
author Jathanna, Nikesh
Podlasek, Anna
Sokol, Albert
Auer, Dorothee
Chen, Xin
Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz
author_facet Jathanna, Nikesh
Podlasek, Anna
Sokol, Albert
Auer, Dorothee
Chen, Xin
Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz
author_sort Jathanna, Nikesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess AI methodologies used for left ventricular scar identification in CMR, imaging sequences used for training, and its diagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, OpenDissertations, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore was undertaken to June 2021 for full-text publications assessing left ventricular scar identification algorithms. No pre-registration was undertaken. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to assess Dice Coefficient (DSC) overlap of learning vs predefined thresholding methods. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included for final review. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to predefined threshold models (0.616 vs 0.633, P = .14) but had higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Meta-analysis of 4 studies revealed standardized mean difference of 1.11; 95% confidence interval -0.16 to 2.38, P = .09, I(2) = 98% favoring learning methods. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of applying AI to the task of scar detection in CMR has been demonstrated, but model evaluation remains heterogenous. Progression toward clinical application requires detailed, transparent, standardized model comparison and increased model generalizability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8890335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88903352022-03-08 Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review Jathanna, Nikesh Podlasek, Anna Sokol, Albert Auer, Dorothee Chen, Xin Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz Cardiovasc Digit Health J Review BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid quantification of ventricular scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) carries importance in arrhythmia management and patient prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to other radiological challenges with success. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess AI methodologies used for left ventricular scar identification in CMR, imaging sequences used for training, and its diagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, OpenDissertations, arXiv, and IEEE Xplore was undertaken to June 2021 for full-text publications assessing left ventricular scar identification algorithms. No pre-registration was undertaken. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to assess Dice Coefficient (DSC) overlap of learning vs predefined thresholding methods. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included for final review. Supervised and unsupervised learning models had similar DSC compared to predefined threshold models (0.616 vs 0.633, P = .14) but had higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Meta-analysis of 4 studies revealed standardized mean difference of 1.11; 95% confidence interval -0.16 to 2.38, P = .09, I(2) = 98% favoring learning methods. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of applying AI to the task of scar detection in CMR has been demonstrated, but model evaluation remains heterogenous. Progression toward clinical application requires detailed, transparent, standardized model comparison and increased model generalizability. Elsevier 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8890335/ /pubmed/35265922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jathanna, Nikesh
Podlasek, Anna
Sokol, Albert
Auer, Dorothee
Chen, Xin
Jamil-Copley, Shahnaz
Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title_full Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title_short Diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—A systematic review
title_sort diagnostic utility of artificial intelligence for left ventricular scar identification using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.11.005
work_keys_str_mv AT jathannanikesh diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT podlasekanna diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT sokolalbert diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT auerdorothee diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT chenxin diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview
AT jamilcopleyshahnaz diagnosticutilityofartificialintelligenceforleftventricularscaridentificationusingcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreview