Cargando…

Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation

INTRODUCTION: We developed a prediction model for atrial fibrillation (AF) progression and tested whether machine learning (ML) could reproduce the prediction power in an independent cohort using pre-procedural non-invasive variables alone. METHODS: Cohort 1 included 1,214 patients and cohort 2, 658...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Je-Wook, Kwon, Oh-Seok, Shim, Jaemin, Hwang, Inseok, Kim, Yun Gi, Yu, Hee Tae, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Kim, Jong-Youn, Choi, Jong Il, Joung, Boyoung, Lee, Moon-Hyoung, Kim, Young-Hoon, Pak, Hui-Nam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.813914
_version_ 1784661646889713664
author Park, Je-Wook
Kwon, Oh-Seok
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Inseok
Kim, Yun Gi
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Jong-Youn
Choi, Jong Il
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_facet Park, Je-Wook
Kwon, Oh-Seok
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Inseok
Kim, Yun Gi
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Jong-Youn
Choi, Jong Il
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_sort Park, Je-Wook
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We developed a prediction model for atrial fibrillation (AF) progression and tested whether machine learning (ML) could reproduce the prediction power in an independent cohort using pre-procedural non-invasive variables alone. METHODS: Cohort 1 included 1,214 patients and cohort 2, 658, and all underwent AF catheter ablation (AFCA). AF progression to permanent AF was defined as sustained AF despite repeat AFCA or cardioversion under antiarrhythmic drugs. We developed a risk stratification model for AF progression (STAAR score) and stratified cohort 1 into three groups. We also developed an ML-prediction model to classify three STAAR risk groups without invasive parameters and validated the risk score in cohort 2. RESULTS: The STAAR score consisted of a stroke (2 points, p = 0.003), persistent AF (1 point, p = 0.049), left atrial (LA) dimension ≥43 mm (1 point, p = 0.010), LA voltage <1.109 mV (2 points, p = 0.004), and PR interval ≥196 ms (1 point, p = 0.001), based on multivariate Cox analyses, and it had a good discriminative power for progression to permanent AF [area under curve (AUC) 0.796, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.753–0.838]. The ML prediction model calculated the risk for AF progression without invasive variables and achieved excellent risk stratification: AUC 0.935 for low-risk groups (score = 0), AUC 0.855 for intermediate-risk groups (score 1–3), and AUC 0.965 for high-risk groups (score ≥ 4) in cohort 1. The ML model successfully predicted the high-risk group for AF progression in cohort 2 (log-rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ML-prediction model successfully classified the high-risk patients who will progress to permanent AF after AFCA without invasive variables but has a limited discrimination power for the intermediate-risk group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8890475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88904752022-03-03 Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation Park, Je-Wook Kwon, Oh-Seok Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Inseok Kim, Yun Gi Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Jong-Youn Choi, Jong Il Joung, Boyoung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: We developed a prediction model for atrial fibrillation (AF) progression and tested whether machine learning (ML) could reproduce the prediction power in an independent cohort using pre-procedural non-invasive variables alone. METHODS: Cohort 1 included 1,214 patients and cohort 2, 658, and all underwent AF catheter ablation (AFCA). AF progression to permanent AF was defined as sustained AF despite repeat AFCA or cardioversion under antiarrhythmic drugs. We developed a risk stratification model for AF progression (STAAR score) and stratified cohort 1 into three groups. We also developed an ML-prediction model to classify three STAAR risk groups without invasive parameters and validated the risk score in cohort 2. RESULTS: The STAAR score consisted of a stroke (2 points, p = 0.003), persistent AF (1 point, p = 0.049), left atrial (LA) dimension ≥43 mm (1 point, p = 0.010), LA voltage <1.109 mV (2 points, p = 0.004), and PR interval ≥196 ms (1 point, p = 0.001), based on multivariate Cox analyses, and it had a good discriminative power for progression to permanent AF [area under curve (AUC) 0.796, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.753–0.838]. The ML prediction model calculated the risk for AF progression without invasive variables and achieved excellent risk stratification: AUC 0.935 for low-risk groups (score = 0), AUC 0.855 for intermediate-risk groups (score 1–3), and AUC 0.965 for high-risk groups (score ≥ 4) in cohort 1. The ML model successfully predicted the high-risk group for AF progression in cohort 2 (log-rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ML-prediction model successfully classified the high-risk patients who will progress to permanent AF after AFCA without invasive variables but has a limited discrimination power for the intermediate-risk group. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8890475/ /pubmed/35252393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.813914 Text en Copyright © 2022 Park, Kwon, Shim, Hwang, Kim, Yu, Kim, Uhm, Kim, Choi, Joung, Lee, Kim and Pak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Park, Je-Wook
Kwon, Oh-Seok
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Inseok
Kim, Yun Gi
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Jong-Youn
Choi, Jong Il
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title_full Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title_fullStr Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title_short Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
title_sort machine learning-predicted progression to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.813914
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjewook machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kwonohseok machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT shimjaemin machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT hwanginseok machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kimyungi machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT yuheetae machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kimtaehoon machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT uhmjaesun machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kimjongyoun machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT choijongil machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT joungboyoung machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT leemoonhyoung machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kimyounghoon machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT pakhuinam machinelearningpredictedprogressiontopermanentatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation