Cargando…
Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications
Pressures to publish, perverse incentives, financial interest and gender are amongst the most commonly discussed risk factors for scientific misconduct. However, evidence of their association with actual data fabrication and falsification is inconclusive. A recent case-controlled analysis of article...
Autores principales: | Fanelli, Daniele, Schleicher, Matteo, Fang, Ferric C., Casadevall, Arturo, Bik, Elisabeth M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35235555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255334 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications
por: Fanelli, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
por: Bik, Elisabeth M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
por: Stern, Andrew M, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Author's misconduct inviting risk: Duplicate publication
por: Nayak, B K
Publicado: (2009)