Cargando…

A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture

The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the impact of applying different configurations of the transpedicular fixation system on selected mechanical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine under conditions of its instability (after simulated fracture). Five study groups were tested: physiolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia, Załuski, Rafał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3817097
_version_ 1784661745590075392
author Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia
Załuski, Rafał
author_facet Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia
Załuski, Rafał
author_sort Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia
collection PubMed
description The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the impact of applying different configurations of the transpedicular fixation system on selected mechanical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine under conditions of its instability (after simulated fracture). Five study groups were tested: physiological, with compression fracture of the vertebra, with two-segment fixation, with three-segment fixation, and with four-segment fixation. Each of the analyzed study groups was subjected to axial compression, flexion, and extension. Based on the conducted experimental tests, the mechanical parameters, i.e., stiffness coefficient and dissipation energy, were determined for all groups under consideration. The stiffness value of two-segment fixation is significantly lower than the physiological value (during flexion and extension). The use of long-segment fixation considered in two configurations (three- and four-segment fixation) may result in excessive stiffness of the system due to the high stiffness values achieved (approx. 25–30% higher than the physiological values in the case of compression and on average 60% higher in the case of flexion). The use of long-segment fixator design shows better results than short-segment fixation. Considering both biomechanical and clinical aspects, three-segment fixation seems to be a compromise solution as it saves the patient from more extensive stiffening of the spinal motion segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8890884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88908842022-03-03 A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia Załuski, Rafał Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article The aim of this experimental study was to analyze the impact of applying different configurations of the transpedicular fixation system on selected mechanical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine under conditions of its instability (after simulated fracture). Five study groups were tested: physiological, with compression fracture of the vertebra, with two-segment fixation, with three-segment fixation, and with four-segment fixation. Each of the analyzed study groups was subjected to axial compression, flexion, and extension. Based on the conducted experimental tests, the mechanical parameters, i.e., stiffness coefficient and dissipation energy, were determined for all groups under consideration. The stiffness value of two-segment fixation is significantly lower than the physiological value (during flexion and extension). The use of long-segment fixation considered in two configurations (three- and four-segment fixation) may result in excessive stiffness of the system due to the high stiffness values achieved (approx. 25–30% higher than the physiological values in the case of compression and on average 60% higher in the case of flexion). The use of long-segment fixator design shows better results than short-segment fixation. Considering both biomechanical and clinical aspects, three-segment fixation seems to be a compromise solution as it saves the patient from more extensive stiffening of the spinal motion segments. Hindawi 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8890884/ /pubmed/35251301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3817097 Text en Copyright © 2022 Klaudia Szkoda-Poliszuk and Rafał Załuski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Szkoda-Poliszuk, Klaudia
Załuski, Rafał
A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title_full A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title_fullStr A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title_short A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of the Impact of Different Configurations of Pedicle-Screw-Based Fixation in Thoracolumbar Compression Fracture
title_sort comparative biomechanical analysis of the impact of different configurations of pedicle-screw-based fixation in thoracolumbar compression fracture
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3817097
work_keys_str_mv AT szkodapoliszukklaudia acomparativebiomechanicalanalysisoftheimpactofdifferentconfigurationsofpediclescrewbasedfixationinthoracolumbarcompressionfracture
AT załuskirafał acomparativebiomechanicalanalysisoftheimpactofdifferentconfigurationsofpediclescrewbasedfixationinthoracolumbarcompressionfracture
AT szkodapoliszukklaudia comparativebiomechanicalanalysisoftheimpactofdifferentconfigurationsofpediclescrewbasedfixationinthoracolumbarcompressionfracture
AT załuskirafał comparativebiomechanicalanalysisoftheimpactofdifferentconfigurationsofpediclescrewbasedfixationinthoracolumbarcompressionfracture