Cargando…

Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study

Objective  This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods  This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Patrícia W., Nogueira, Paulo J., Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo, Guedes, Carlos Moura, Salvado, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802
_version_ 1784661755190837248
author Ferreira, Patrícia W.
Nogueira, Paulo J.
Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo
Guedes, Carlos Moura
Salvado, Francisco
author_facet Ferreira, Patrícia W.
Nogueira, Paulo J.
Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo
Guedes, Carlos Moura
Salvado, Francisco
author_sort Ferreira, Patrícia W.
collection PubMed
description Objective  This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods  This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants with external connection (cases) and 282 individuals without mechanical complications (control). Pairing was performed for sex, age (range = 3 years), and follow-up months (range = 11 months). The primary outcome measure was implant survival, while the secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and biological complication parameters (peri-implant pathology, soft tissue inflammation, fistula formation, and abscess formation). Statistical Analysis  Cumulative implant survival was estimated by using life tables. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) were performed to evaluate differences between cases and controls. The significance level was set at 5%. Results  The average follow-up duration was 8.5 years. Mechanical complications included prosthetic fracture ( n = 159), abutment loosening ( n = 89), prosthetic screw loosening ( n = 20), milled abutment ( n = 12), milled prosthetic screw ( n = 1), and decemented crown ( n = 1). Implant failure occurred in one patient from the control group, with survival rates of 100 and 99.6% for cases and controls, respectively ( p = 0.317). The average marginal bone loss was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60–1.84) for cases and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.45–1.65) for controls ( p = 0.068). Biological complications were observed in 90 patients, with significant differences between cases ( n = 54) and controls ( n = 36; p = 0.038). Conclusion  Mechanical complications did not significantly influence survival or marginal bone loss; nevertheless, there is a need for studies with longer follow-up duration. Mechanical complications also significantly influence the incidence of biological complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8890925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88909252022-03-03 Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study Ferreira, Patrícia W. Nogueira, Paulo J. Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo Guedes, Carlos Moura Salvado, Francisco Eur J Dent Objective  This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods  This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants with external connection (cases) and 282 individuals without mechanical complications (control). Pairing was performed for sex, age (range = 3 years), and follow-up months (range = 11 months). The primary outcome measure was implant survival, while the secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and biological complication parameters (peri-implant pathology, soft tissue inflammation, fistula formation, and abscess formation). Statistical Analysis  Cumulative implant survival was estimated by using life tables. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) were performed to evaluate differences between cases and controls. The significance level was set at 5%. Results  The average follow-up duration was 8.5 years. Mechanical complications included prosthetic fracture ( n = 159), abutment loosening ( n = 89), prosthetic screw loosening ( n = 20), milled abutment ( n = 12), milled prosthetic screw ( n = 1), and decemented crown ( n = 1). Implant failure occurred in one patient from the control group, with survival rates of 100 and 99.6% for cases and controls, respectively ( p = 0.317). The average marginal bone loss was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60–1.84) for cases and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.45–1.65) for controls ( p = 0.068). Biological complications were observed in 90 patients, with significant differences between cases ( n = 54) and controls ( n = 36; p = 0.038). Conclusion  Mechanical complications did not significantly influence survival or marginal bone loss; nevertheless, there is a need for studies with longer follow-up duration. Mechanical complications also significantly influence the incidence of biological complications. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8890925/ /pubmed/34587636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ferreira, Patrícia W.
Nogueira, Paulo J.
Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo
Guedes, Carlos Moura
Salvado, Francisco
Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title_full Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title_fullStr Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title_short Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
title_sort impact of mechanical complications on success of dental implant treatments: a case–control study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreirapatriciaw impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy
AT nogueirapauloj impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy
AT nobremigueladearaujo impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy
AT guedescarlosmoura impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy
AT salvadofrancisco impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy