Cargando…
Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study
Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802 |
_version_ | 1784661755190837248 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Patrícia W. Nogueira, Paulo J. Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo Guedes, Carlos Moura Salvado, Francisco |
author_facet | Ferreira, Patrícia W. Nogueira, Paulo J. Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo Guedes, Carlos Moura Salvado, Francisco |
author_sort | Ferreira, Patrícia W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants with external connection (cases) and 282 individuals without mechanical complications (control). Pairing was performed for sex, age (range = 3 years), and follow-up months (range = 11 months). The primary outcome measure was implant survival, while the secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and biological complication parameters (peri-implant pathology, soft tissue inflammation, fistula formation, and abscess formation). Statistical Analysis Cumulative implant survival was estimated by using life tables. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) were performed to evaluate differences between cases and controls. The significance level was set at 5%. Results The average follow-up duration was 8.5 years. Mechanical complications included prosthetic fracture ( n = 159), abutment loosening ( n = 89), prosthetic screw loosening ( n = 20), milled abutment ( n = 12), milled prosthetic screw ( n = 1), and decemented crown ( n = 1). Implant failure occurred in one patient from the control group, with survival rates of 100 and 99.6% for cases and controls, respectively ( p = 0.317). The average marginal bone loss was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60–1.84) for cases and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.45–1.65) for controls ( p = 0.068). Biological complications were observed in 90 patients, with significant differences between cases ( n = 54) and controls ( n = 36; p = 0.038). Conclusion Mechanical complications did not significantly influence survival or marginal bone loss; nevertheless, there is a need for studies with longer follow-up duration. Mechanical complications also significantly influence the incidence of biological complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8890925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88909252022-03-03 Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study Ferreira, Patrícia W. Nogueira, Paulo J. Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo Guedes, Carlos Moura Salvado, Francisco Eur J Dent Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of mechanical complications on outcome measures for implant dentistry. Materials and Methods This case–control study included 282 patients with mechanical complications occurring in fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants with external connection (cases) and 282 individuals without mechanical complications (control). Pairing was performed for sex, age (range = 3 years), and follow-up months (range = 11 months). The primary outcome measure was implant survival, while the secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and biological complication parameters (peri-implant pathology, soft tissue inflammation, fistula formation, and abscess formation). Statistical Analysis Cumulative implant survival was estimated by using life tables. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) were performed to evaluate differences between cases and controls. The significance level was set at 5%. Results The average follow-up duration was 8.5 years. Mechanical complications included prosthetic fracture ( n = 159), abutment loosening ( n = 89), prosthetic screw loosening ( n = 20), milled abutment ( n = 12), milled prosthetic screw ( n = 1), and decemented crown ( n = 1). Implant failure occurred in one patient from the control group, with survival rates of 100 and 99.6% for cases and controls, respectively ( p = 0.317). The average marginal bone loss was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60–1.84) for cases and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.45–1.65) for controls ( p = 0.068). Biological complications were observed in 90 patients, with significant differences between cases ( n = 54) and controls ( n = 36; p = 0.038). Conclusion Mechanical complications did not significantly influence survival or marginal bone loss; nevertheless, there is a need for studies with longer follow-up duration. Mechanical complications also significantly influence the incidence of biological complications. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8890925/ /pubmed/34587636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ferreira, Patrícia W. Nogueira, Paulo J. Nobre, Miguel A. de Araújo Guedes, Carlos Moura Salvado, Francisco Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title | Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title_full | Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title_fullStr | Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title_short | Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study |
title_sort | impact of mechanical complications on success of dental implant treatments: a case–control study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreirapatriciaw impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy AT nogueirapauloj impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy AT nobremigueladearaujo impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy AT guedescarlosmoura impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy AT salvadofrancisco impactofmechanicalcomplicationsonsuccessofdentalimplanttreatmentsacasecontrolstudy |