Cargando…

Beam Profiling of Dental Light Curing Units Using Different Camera-Based Systems

Objective  This study aimed to perform the beam profile of dental light-curing units (LCUs) using mirrorless and smartphone cameras and correlate it to a camera-based laser beam profiling system. Materials and Methods  Three LCUs were evaluated (Radii Plus; Bluephase G2; and VALO Cordless). The spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocha, Mateus Garcia, Oliveira, Dayane, Felix, Christopher, Roulet, Jean-François, Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho, Correr, Américo Bortolazzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8890939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731628
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  This study aimed to perform the beam profile of dental light-curing units (LCUs) using mirrorless and smartphone cameras and correlate it to a camera-based laser beam profiling system. Materials and Methods  Three LCUs were evaluated (Radii Plus; Bluephase G2; and VALO Cordless). The spectral power of the LCUs was measured by using a spectrophotometer. The light emitted from the LCUs was projected onto a glass diffuser, and the images were recorded by using a mirrorless camera (NEX-F3), a smartphone (iPhone) and a camera-based beam profiler. Bandpass optical-filters were used, and for each LCU, the total spectral power output was integrated to calibrate the images. Statistical analysis was performed by digital image correlation (pixel by pixel) using Pearson’s correlation (α = 0.05; β = 0.2). Results  The beam profile images showed nonuniform radiant emittance and spectral emission distributions across all the LCUs light tip. A strong correlation was found among cameras (Pearson’s r = 0.91 ± 0.03 with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–0.94 for the NEX-F3 and Pearson’s r = 0.88 ± 0.04 with 95% CI: 0.84–0.92 for the iPhone). Conclusion  The standard Ophir beam profile system presented the most accurate distribution, but the mirrorless and smartphone cameras presented a strong correlation in the irradiance distribution of the beam profile images. Alternative cameras can be used to perform light beam profile of dental LCUs, but caution is needed as the type of sensor, image bit depth, and image processing are important to obtain accurate results.