Cargando…
Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
BACKGROUND: This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere(®) Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES:...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34773608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0 |
_version_ | 1784661815103324160 |
---|---|
author | Grant, Marshall Heise, Tim Baughman, Robert |
author_facet | Grant, Marshall Heise, Tim Baughman, Robert |
author_sort | Grant, Marshall |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere(®) Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES: This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. RESULTS: Insulin exposure was more than dose proportional, increasing with dose(1.08) for LIS and dose(1.35) for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect. CONCLUSIONS: Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8891188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88911882022-03-08 Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Grant, Marshall Heise, Tim Baughman, Robert Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere(®) Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES: This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. RESULTS: Insulin exposure was more than dose proportional, increasing with dose(1.08) for LIS and dose(1.35) for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect. CONCLUSIONS: Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8891188/ /pubmed/34773608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Grant, Marshall Heise, Tim Baughman, Robert Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title | Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full | Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title_short | Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
title_sort | comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled technosphere insulin and subcutaneous insulin lispro in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34773608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grantmarshall comparisonofpharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofinhaledtechnosphereinsulinandsubcutaneousinsulinlisprointhetreatmentoftype1diabetesmellitus AT heisetim comparisonofpharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofinhaledtechnosphereinsulinandsubcutaneousinsulinlisprointhetreatmentoftype1diabetesmellitus AT baughmanrobert comparisonofpharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofinhaledtechnosphereinsulinandsubcutaneousinsulinlisprointhetreatmentoftype1diabetesmellitus |