Cargando…

Impact of Irradiation on the Pharmacokinetics and Biotransformation of Tamoxifen

BACKGROUND: The optimal procedure for combining radiotherapy (RT) with tamoxifen treatment is controversial as RT may alter the pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of tamoxifen. The present study investigated this potential interaction by assessing the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen during concurr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Yung-Yi, Zheng, Teresa, Chang, Michael W., Dalley, Jeffrey W., Chen, Yu-Jen, Tsai, Tung-Hu, Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.833108
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The optimal procedure for combining radiotherapy (RT) with tamoxifen treatment is controversial as RT may alter the pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of tamoxifen. The present study investigated this potential interaction by assessing the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen during concurrent and sequential RT. METHOD: Plasma tamoxifen concentration was measured in rats with or without RT 2.0 Gy (RT(2.0Gy)) or 0.5 Gy (RT(0.5Gy)) with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after tamoxifen administration (10 mg/kg, p.o., n = 6). Tamoxifen was either administered 1 h after RT (concurrent condition) or 24 h after RT (sequential condition). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) and half-life of tamoxifen were 2,004 ± 241 h ng/ml and 6.23 ± 1.21 h, respectively, after tamoxifen administration (10 mg/kg, p.o.). The respective conversion rate of 4-hydroxytamoxifen, N-desmethytamoxifen, and endoxifen for tamoxifen metabolism was 20%, 16%, and 5%. The AUC value of tamoxifen in the RT(0.5Gy) group was 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher than in the sham and RT(2.0Gy) groups. The relative bioavailability of tamoxifen at concurrent RT(0.5Gy) and RT(2.0Gy) groups ranged from 127% to 202% and from 71% to 152%, respectively. The magnitude of endoxifen, which converted from 4-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen, increased 3- to 5-fold in the concurrent RT groups. By contrast, the AUC of tamoxifen decreased by roughly 24% in the sequential RT(2.0Gy) group. The conversion ratio of endoxifen was four times higher than that in the sequential RT(2.0Gy) group compared with rats not exposed to RT. CONCLUSION: The current study provides advanced pharmacokinetic data to confirm the interaction between RT and hormone therapy. Our findings indicate that RT facilitates the metabolism of tamoxifen to active metabolites and thus imply that combination RT-tamoxifen has potential benefits for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer.