Cargando…

Morphological characteristics of the mesiobuccal root in the presence of a second mesiobuccal canal: a micro-CT study

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the internal morphology of mesiobuccal (MB) roots of maxillary molars with a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven maxillary first or second molars from Brazilians were scanned using micro-computed tomography. The following measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosado, Lucas P. Lopes, Oliveira, Matheus Lima, Rovaris, Karla, Freitas, Deborah Queiroz, Neves, Frederico Sampaio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284322
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e6
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the internal morphology of mesiobuccal (MB) roots of maxillary molars with a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven maxillary first or second molars from Brazilians were scanned using micro-computed tomography. The following measurements were obtained from the MB roots: root thickness, root width, and dentin thickness of the buccal aspect of the first mesiobuccal (MB1) canal, between the MB1 and MB2 canals, and the palatal aspect of the MB2 and MB1 canals at 3 mm from the root apex and in the furcation region. For statistical analysis, the Student’s t-test and analysis of variance with the post-hoc Tukey test were used (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In maxillary molars with an MB2 canal, MB roots were significantly thicker (p = 0.0014) and narrower (p = 0.0016) than in maxillary molars without an MB2 canal. The dentin thickness of the palatal aspect of the MB1 canal was also significantly greater than that of MB roots without an MB2 canal at 3 mm from the root apex (p = 0.0007) and in the furcation region (p < 0.0001). In the furcation region of maxillary molars with an MB2 canal, the dentin thickness between the MB1 and MB2 canals was significantly smaller than that in the buccal and palatal aspects (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The internal morphology of MB roots of maxillary molars with an MB2 canal revealed differences in dentin thickness, root diameter, and distance between the canals when compared with maxillary molars without an MB2 canal.