Cargando…

Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review

This study aimed to describe the outcomes of the GentleWave system (GW) (Sonendo) on root canal treatment. Published articles were collected from scientific databases (MEDLINE/PubMed platform, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase). A total of 24 studies were collected from August/2014 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán, Gaeta, Eduarda, Faria, Gisele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e11
_version_ 1784661885318070272
author Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán
Gaeta, Eduarda
Faria, Gisele
author_facet Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán
Gaeta, Eduarda
Faria, Gisele
author_sort Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to describe the outcomes of the GentleWave system (GW) (Sonendo) on root canal treatment. Published articles were collected from scientific databases (MEDLINE/PubMed platform, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase). A total of 24 studies were collected from August/2014 to July/2021, 20 in vitro and 4 clinical. GW System was not associated with extrusion of the irrigant, promoted faster organic dissolution than conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and EndoVac, reduced more bacterial DNA and biofilm than PUI and CUI, promoted higher penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules than PUI and CUI in vitro, and removed more intracanal medication than CSI and PUI. GW was able to remove pulp tissue and calcifications. Moreover, its ability to remove hard-tissue debris and smear layer was better than that of CSI, and its ability to remove root canal obturation residues was lower or similar to that of PUI, and similar to that of CSI and EndoVac. Regarding root canal obturation of minimally instrumented molar canals, GW was associated with high-quality obturation. Clinically, the success rate of endodontic treatment using GW was 97.3%, and the short-term postoperative pain in the GW group was not different from CSI. Further research, mainly clinical, is needed to establish whether GW has any advantages over other available irrigation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8891464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88914642022-03-10 Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán Gaeta, Eduarda Faria, Gisele Restor Dent Endod Review Article This study aimed to describe the outcomes of the GentleWave system (GW) (Sonendo) on root canal treatment. Published articles were collected from scientific databases (MEDLINE/PubMed platform, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase). A total of 24 studies were collected from August/2014 to July/2021, 20 in vitro and 4 clinical. GW System was not associated with extrusion of the irrigant, promoted faster organic dissolution than conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and EndoVac, reduced more bacterial DNA and biofilm than PUI and CUI, promoted higher penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules than PUI and CUI in vitro, and removed more intracanal medication than CSI and PUI. GW was able to remove pulp tissue and calcifications. Moreover, its ability to remove hard-tissue debris and smear layer was better than that of CSI, and its ability to remove root canal obturation residues was lower or similar to that of PUI, and similar to that of CSI and EndoVac. Regarding root canal obturation of minimally instrumented molar canals, GW was associated with high-quality obturation. Clinically, the success rate of endodontic treatment using GW was 97.3%, and the short-term postoperative pain in the GW group was not different from CSI. Further research, mainly clinical, is needed to establish whether GW has any advantages over other available irrigation methods. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8891464/ /pubmed/35284323 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e11 Text en Copyright © 2022. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán
Gaeta, Eduarda
Faria, Gisele
Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title_full Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title_fullStr Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title_short Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
title_sort outcomes of the gentlewave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e11
work_keys_str_mv AT coaguilallerenahernan outcomesofthegentlewavesystemonrootcanaltreatmentanarrativereview
AT gaetaeduarda outcomesofthegentlewavesystemonrootcanaltreatmentanarrativereview
AT fariagisele outcomesofthegentlewavesystemonrootcanaltreatmentanarrativereview