Cargando…
Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data
Responses to sprint interval exercise (SIE) are hypothesized to be perceived as unpleasant, but SIE protocols are diverse, and moderating effects of various SIE protocol parameters on affective responses are unknown. We performed a systematic search to identify studies (up to 01/05/2021) measuring a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.815555 |
_version_ | 1784661953957855232 |
---|---|
author | Metcalfe, Richard S. Williams, Sean Fernandes, Gwen S. Astorino, Todd A. Stork, Matthew J. Phillips, Shaun M. Niven, Ailsa Vollaard, Niels B. J. |
author_facet | Metcalfe, Richard S. Williams, Sean Fernandes, Gwen S. Astorino, Todd A. Stork, Matthew J. Phillips, Shaun M. Niven, Ailsa Vollaard, Niels B. J. |
author_sort | Metcalfe, Richard S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Responses to sprint interval exercise (SIE) are hypothesized to be perceived as unpleasant, but SIE protocols are diverse, and moderating effects of various SIE protocol parameters on affective responses are unknown. We performed a systematic search to identify studies (up to 01/05/2021) measuring affective valence using the Feeling Scale during acute SIE in healthy adults. Thirteen studies involving 18 unique trials and 316 unique participant (142 women and 174 men) affective responses to SIE were eligible for inclusion. We received individual participant data for all participants from all studies. All available end-of-sprint affect scores from each trial were combined in a linear mixed model with sprint duration, mode, intensity, recovery duration, familiarization and baseline affect included as covariates. Affective valence decreased significantly and proportionally with each additional sprint repetition, but this effect was modified by sprint duration: affect decreased more during 30 s (0.84 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93) and 15–20 s sprints (1.02 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.93–1.10) compared with 5–6 s sprints (0.20 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.18–0.22) (both p < 0.0001). Although the difference between 15–20 s and 30 s sprints was also significant (p = 0.02), the effect size was trivial (d = −0.12). We observed significant but trivial effects of mode, sprint intensity and pre-trial familiarization, whilst there was no significant effect of recovery duration. We conclude that affective valence declines during SIE, but the magnitude of the decrease for an overall SIE session strongly depends on the number and duration of sprints. This information can be applied by researchers to design SIE protocols that are less likely to be perceived as unpleasant in studies of real-world effectiveness. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/sbyn3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8891702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88917022022-03-04 Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data Metcalfe, Richard S. Williams, Sean Fernandes, Gwen S. Astorino, Todd A. Stork, Matthew J. Phillips, Shaun M. Niven, Ailsa Vollaard, Niels B. J. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Responses to sprint interval exercise (SIE) are hypothesized to be perceived as unpleasant, but SIE protocols are diverse, and moderating effects of various SIE protocol parameters on affective responses are unknown. We performed a systematic search to identify studies (up to 01/05/2021) measuring affective valence using the Feeling Scale during acute SIE in healthy adults. Thirteen studies involving 18 unique trials and 316 unique participant (142 women and 174 men) affective responses to SIE were eligible for inclusion. We received individual participant data for all participants from all studies. All available end-of-sprint affect scores from each trial were combined in a linear mixed model with sprint duration, mode, intensity, recovery duration, familiarization and baseline affect included as covariates. Affective valence decreased significantly and proportionally with each additional sprint repetition, but this effect was modified by sprint duration: affect decreased more during 30 s (0.84 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.74–0.93) and 15–20 s sprints (1.02 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.93–1.10) compared with 5–6 s sprints (0.20 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.18–0.22) (both p < 0.0001). Although the difference between 15–20 s and 30 s sprints was also significant (p = 0.02), the effect size was trivial (d = −0.12). We observed significant but trivial effects of mode, sprint intensity and pre-trial familiarization, whilst there was no significant effect of recovery duration. We conclude that affective valence declines during SIE, but the magnitude of the decrease for an overall SIE session strongly depends on the number and duration of sprints. This information can be applied by researchers to design SIE protocols that are less likely to be perceived as unpleasant in studies of real-world effectiveness. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/sbyn3. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8891702/ /pubmed/35252858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.815555 Text en Copyright © 2022 Metcalfe, Williams, Fernandes, Astorino, Stork, Phillips, Niven and Vollaard. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Sports and Active Living Metcalfe, Richard S. Williams, Sean Fernandes, Gwen S. Astorino, Todd A. Stork, Matthew J. Phillips, Shaun M. Niven, Ailsa Vollaard, Niels B. J. Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title | Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title_full | Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title_fullStr | Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title_short | Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data |
title_sort | affecting effects on affect: the impact of protocol permutations on affective responses to sprint interval exercise; a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled individual participant data |
topic | Sports and Active Living |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.815555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalferichards affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT williamssean affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT fernandesgwens affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT astorinotodda affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT storkmatthewj affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT phillipsshaunm affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT nivenailsa affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata AT vollaardnielsbj affectingeffectsonaffecttheimpactofprotocolpermutationsonaffectiveresponsestosprintintervalexerciseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpooledindividualparticipantdata |