Cargando…

Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify information about telehealth and rehabilitation for the evaluation and management of musculoskeletal disorders, patient satisfaction, cost, and access as may be applicable during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bucki, Frank M., Clay, Michael B., Tobiczyk, Hannah, Green, Bart N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: by National University of Health Sciences. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.003
_version_ 1784662107489304576
author Bucki, Frank M.
Clay, Michael B.
Tobiczyk, Hannah
Green, Bart N.
author_facet Bucki, Frank M.
Clay, Michael B.
Tobiczyk, Hannah
Green, Bart N.
author_sort Bucki, Frank M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify information about telehealth and rehabilitation for the evaluation and management of musculoskeletal disorders, patient satisfaction, cost, and access as may be applicable during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for studies published between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2019. Search terms consisted of MEDLINE medical subject headings and other words relevant to this review, including “telerehabilitation,” “musculoskeletal,” “telemedicine,” “therapy,” “chiropractic,” “ergonomics,” and “exercise.” This review targeted studies of people aged 18 years and older with musculoskeletal concerns. Articles on diagnostic tests, effectiveness of treatment, patient satisfaction, access to care, and cost were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review. Interrater reliability and agreement were moderate to high for several assessment procedures for the lower limb, elbow, and low back. Two clinical trials demonstrated that provider and patient simultaneous telehealth were equally as effective as in-office care. Patient and provider satisfaction with telehealth were reported to be equal to or higher than for conventional rehabilitation. We found no studies reporting cost or access. CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic environment, telehealth is feasible for health care providers to provide rehabilitation services for their patients with various musculoskeletal conditions. Current evidence suggests that for some musculoskeletal disorders, telehealth evaluation may be reliable, treatment may be effective, and patient satisfaction may be good or better than for in-office care. Results from this study may help physiatry, physical therapy, and chiropractic health care providers in their decisions to implement telehealth during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher by National University of Health Sciences.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88922222022-03-04 Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic Bucki, Frank M. Clay, Michael B. Tobiczyk, Hannah Green, Bart N. J Manipulative Physiol Ther Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify information about telehealth and rehabilitation for the evaluation and management of musculoskeletal disorders, patient satisfaction, cost, and access as may be applicable during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for studies published between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2019. Search terms consisted of MEDLINE medical subject headings and other words relevant to this review, including “telerehabilitation,” “musculoskeletal,” “telemedicine,” “therapy,” “chiropractic,” “ergonomics,” and “exercise.” This review targeted studies of people aged 18 years and older with musculoskeletal concerns. Articles on diagnostic tests, effectiveness of treatment, patient satisfaction, access to care, and cost were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in this review. Interrater reliability and agreement were moderate to high for several assessment procedures for the lower limb, elbow, and low back. Two clinical trials demonstrated that provider and patient simultaneous telehealth were equally as effective as in-office care. Patient and provider satisfaction with telehealth were reported to be equal to or higher than for conventional rehabilitation. We found no studies reporting cost or access. CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic environment, telehealth is feasible for health care providers to provide rehabilitation services for their patients with various musculoskeletal conditions. Current evidence suggests that for some musculoskeletal disorders, telehealth evaluation may be reliable, treatment may be effective, and patient satisfaction may be good or better than for in-office care. Results from this study may help physiatry, physical therapy, and chiropractic health care providers in their decisions to implement telehealth during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. by National University of Health Sciences. 2021-09 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8892222/ /pubmed/35249750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.003 Text en © 2022 by National University of Health Sciences. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Bucki, Frank M.
Clay, Michael B.
Tobiczyk, Hannah
Green, Bart N.
Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Scoping Review of Telehealth for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort scoping review of telehealth for musculoskeletal disorders: applications for the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT buckifrankm scopingreviewoftelehealthformusculoskeletaldisordersapplicationsforthecovid19pandemic
AT claymichaelb scopingreviewoftelehealthformusculoskeletaldisordersapplicationsforthecovid19pandemic
AT tobiczykhannah scopingreviewoftelehealthformusculoskeletaldisordersapplicationsforthecovid19pandemic
AT greenbartn scopingreviewoftelehealthformusculoskeletaldisordersapplicationsforthecovid19pandemic