Cargando…
Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock
Recent breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies that can render individual animals fully resistant to infections may offer unprecedented opportunities for controlling future epidemics in farm animals. Yet, their potential for reducing disease spread is poorly understood as the necessary theoretica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107224119 |
_version_ | 1784662124339920896 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Gertje Eta Leony Buntjer, Jaap B. Hely, Fiona S. Byrne, Timothy John Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea |
author_facet | Petersen, Gertje Eta Leony Buntjer, Jaap B. Hely, Fiona S. Byrne, Timothy John Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea |
author_sort | Petersen, Gertje Eta Leony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies that can render individual animals fully resistant to infections may offer unprecedented opportunities for controlling future epidemics in farm animals. Yet, their potential for reducing disease spread is poorly understood as the necessary theoretical framework for estimating epidemiological effects arising from gene-editing applications is currently lacking. Here, we develop semistochastic modeling approaches to investigate how the adoption of gene editing may affect infectious disease prevalence in farmed animal populations and the prospects and time scale for disease elimination. We apply our models to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), one of the most persistent global livestock diseases to date. Whereas extensive control efforts have shown limited success, recent production of gene-edited pigs that are fully resistant to the PRRS virus have raised expectations for eliminating this deadly disease. Our models predict that disease elimination on a national scale would be difficult to achieve if gene editing was used as the only disease control. However, from a purely epidemiological perspective, disease elimination may be achievable within 3 to 6 y, if gene editing were complemented with widespread and sufficiently effective vaccination. Besides strategic distribution of genetically resistant animals, several other key determinants underpinning the epidemiological impact of gene editing were identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8892294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88922942022-08-25 Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock Petersen, Gertje Eta Leony Buntjer, Jaap B. Hely, Fiona S. Byrne, Timothy John Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Recent breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies that can render individual animals fully resistant to infections may offer unprecedented opportunities for controlling future epidemics in farm animals. Yet, their potential for reducing disease spread is poorly understood as the necessary theoretical framework for estimating epidemiological effects arising from gene-editing applications is currently lacking. Here, we develop semistochastic modeling approaches to investigate how the adoption of gene editing may affect infectious disease prevalence in farmed animal populations and the prospects and time scale for disease elimination. We apply our models to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), one of the most persistent global livestock diseases to date. Whereas extensive control efforts have shown limited success, recent production of gene-edited pigs that are fully resistant to the PRRS virus have raised expectations for eliminating this deadly disease. Our models predict that disease elimination on a national scale would be difficult to achieve if gene editing was used as the only disease control. However, from a purely epidemiological perspective, disease elimination may be achievable within 3 to 6 y, if gene editing were complemented with widespread and sufficiently effective vaccination. Besides strategic distribution of genetically resistant animals, several other key determinants underpinning the epidemiological impact of gene editing were identified. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-25 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8892294/ /pubmed/35217603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107224119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Petersen, Gertje Eta Leony Buntjer, Jaap B. Hely, Fiona S. Byrne, Timothy John Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title | Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title_full | Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title_fullStr | Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title_short | Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
title_sort | modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35217603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107224119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersengertjeetaleony modelingsuggestsgeneeditingcombinedwithvaccinationcouldeliminateapersistentdiseaseinlivestock AT buntjerjaapb modelingsuggestsgeneeditingcombinedwithvaccinationcouldeliminateapersistentdiseaseinlivestock AT helyfionas modelingsuggestsgeneeditingcombinedwithvaccinationcouldeliminateapersistentdiseaseinlivestock AT byrnetimothyjohn modelingsuggestsgeneeditingcombinedwithvaccinationcouldeliminateapersistentdiseaseinlivestock AT doeschlwilsonandrea modelingsuggestsgeneeditingcombinedwithvaccinationcouldeliminateapersistentdiseaseinlivestock |