Cargando…

A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AMATYA, Bhasker, ELMALIK, Alaeldin, LEE, Su Yi, SONG, KRYSTAL, GALEA, Mary P., KHAN, Fary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001136
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349
_version_ 1784662124856868864
author AMATYA, Bhasker
ELMALIK, Alaeldin
LEE, Su Yi
SONG, KRYSTAL
GALEA, Mary P.
KHAN, Fary
author_facet AMATYA, Bhasker
ELMALIK, Alaeldin
LEE, Su Yi
SONG, KRYSTAL
GALEA, Mary P.
KHAN, Fary
author_sort AMATYA, Bhasker
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation facility. The post-stroke checklist was administered at hospital discharge (T1) and 3 months post-discharge (T2). Furthermore, validated questionnaires assessed function and participation, including the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) on admission (T0), T1 and T2. RESULTS: Participants’ mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation; SD) 14.6), 58% of participants were female, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 32.7 days (SD 22.4). At T1, 80% and at T2 only 60% of participants reported ≥1 strokerelated problem (mean 5.3 (SD 3.3) and 3.6 (SD 2.8), respectively). Half of participants were referred to physiotherapy/occupational therapy, and 36% to specialist clinics following discharge. The most prevalent problems included: life after stroke (62.2%), fatigue (55.6%), activities of daily living, and mobility (51.1% each). Compared with T1, at T2 there was an observed reduction in all mPSC items, except pain and incontinence. Participants showed improved function at T1 and T2 (Extension Index, ClinFIT set), from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 (p<0.001, with large effect sizes). CONCLUSION: The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community. It can identify relevant stroke-related problems, and hence facilitate targeted intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88922962022-03-08 A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AMATYA, Bhasker ELMALIK, Alaeldin LEE, Su Yi SONG, KRYSTAL GALEA, Mary P. KHAN, Fary J Rehabil Med Original Report OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation facility. The post-stroke checklist was administered at hospital discharge (T1) and 3 months post-discharge (T2). Furthermore, validated questionnaires assessed function and participation, including the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) on admission (T0), T1 and T2. RESULTS: Participants’ mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation; SD) 14.6), 58% of participants were female, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 32.7 days (SD 22.4). At T1, 80% and at T2 only 60% of participants reported ≥1 strokerelated problem (mean 5.3 (SD 3.3) and 3.6 (SD 2.8), respectively). Half of participants were referred to physiotherapy/occupational therapy, and 36% to specialist clinics following discharge. The most prevalent problems included: life after stroke (62.2%), fatigue (55.6%), activities of daily living, and mobility (51.1% each). Compared with T1, at T2 there was an observed reduction in all mPSC items, except pain and incontinence. Participants showed improved function at T1 and T2 (Extension Index, ClinFIT set), from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 (p<0.001, with large effect sizes). CONCLUSION: The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community. It can identify relevant stroke-related problems, and hence facilitate targeted intervention. Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8892296/ /pubmed/35001136 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349 Text en © 2022 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Report
AMATYA, Bhasker
ELMALIK, Alaeldin
LEE, Su Yi
SONG, KRYSTAL
GALEA, Mary P.
KHAN, Fary
A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title_full A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title_fullStr A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title_full_unstemmed A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title_short A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
title_sort process evaluation of patient care needs using the post-stroke checklist: a prospective study
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001136
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349
work_keys_str_mv AT amatyabhasker aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT elmalikalaeldin aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT leesuyi aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT songkrystal aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT galeamaryp aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT khanfary aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT amatyabhasker processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT elmalikalaeldin processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT leesuyi processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT songkrystal processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT galeamaryp processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy
AT khanfary processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy