Cargando…
A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001136 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349 |
_version_ | 1784662124856868864 |
---|---|
author | AMATYA, Bhasker ELMALIK, Alaeldin LEE, Su Yi SONG, KRYSTAL GALEA, Mary P. KHAN, Fary |
author_facet | AMATYA, Bhasker ELMALIK, Alaeldin LEE, Su Yi SONG, KRYSTAL GALEA, Mary P. KHAN, Fary |
author_sort | AMATYA, Bhasker |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation facility. The post-stroke checklist was administered at hospital discharge (T1) and 3 months post-discharge (T2). Furthermore, validated questionnaires assessed function and participation, including the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) on admission (T0), T1 and T2. RESULTS: Participants’ mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation; SD) 14.6), 58% of participants were female, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 32.7 days (SD 22.4). At T1, 80% and at T2 only 60% of participants reported ≥1 strokerelated problem (mean 5.3 (SD 3.3) and 3.6 (SD 2.8), respectively). Half of participants were referred to physiotherapy/occupational therapy, and 36% to specialist clinics following discharge. The most prevalent problems included: life after stroke (62.2%), fatigue (55.6%), activities of daily living, and mobility (51.1% each). Compared with T1, at T2 there was an observed reduction in all mPSC items, except pain and incontinence. Participants showed improved function at T1 and T2 (Extension Index, ClinFIT set), from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 (p<0.001, with large effect sizes). CONCLUSION: The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community. It can identify relevant stroke-related problems, and hence facilitate targeted intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8892296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Foundation for Rehabilitation Information |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88922962022-03-08 A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AMATYA, Bhasker ELMALIK, Alaeldin LEE, Su Yi SONG, KRYSTAL GALEA, Mary P. KHAN, Fary J Rehabil Med Original Report OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the modified Post-Stroke Checklist (mPSC) to identify impairments and care needs of patients with stroke (PwS) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Prospective observational design with consecutive admission of PwS (n = 44) at a tertiary rehabilitation facility. The post-stroke checklist was administered at hospital discharge (T1) and 3 months post-discharge (T2). Furthermore, validated questionnaires assessed function and participation, including the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) on admission (T0), T1 and T2. RESULTS: Participants’ mean age was 67.7 years (standard deviation; SD) 14.6), 58% of participants were female, and the mean length of inpatient stay was 32.7 days (SD 22.4). At T1, 80% and at T2 only 60% of participants reported ≥1 strokerelated problem (mean 5.3 (SD 3.3) and 3.6 (SD 2.8), respectively). Half of participants were referred to physiotherapy/occupational therapy, and 36% to specialist clinics following discharge. The most prevalent problems included: life after stroke (62.2%), fatigue (55.6%), activities of daily living, and mobility (51.1% each). Compared with T1, at T2 there was an observed reduction in all mPSC items, except pain and incontinence. Participants showed improved function at T1 and T2 (Extension Index, ClinFIT set), from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 (p<0.001, with large effect sizes). CONCLUSION: The mPSC is feasible to implement in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and community. It can identify relevant stroke-related problems, and hence facilitate targeted intervention. Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8892296/ /pubmed/35001136 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349 Text en © 2022 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Report AMATYA, Bhasker ELMALIK, Alaeldin LEE, Su Yi SONG, KRYSTAL GALEA, Mary P. KHAN, Fary A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title | A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title_full | A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title_fullStr | A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title_full_unstemmed | A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title_short | A PROCESS EVALUATION OF PATIENT CARE NEEDS USING THE POST-STROKE CHECKLIST: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
title_sort | process evaluation of patient care needs using the post-stroke checklist: a prospective study |
topic | Original Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001136 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amatyabhasker aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT elmalikalaeldin aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT leesuyi aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT songkrystal aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT galeamaryp aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT khanfary aprocessevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT amatyabhasker processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT elmalikalaeldin processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT leesuyi processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT songkrystal processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT galeamaryp processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy AT khanfary processevaluationofpatientcareneedsusingthepoststrokechecklistaprospectivestudy |