Cargando…

The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States

This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in natural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryo, Emily, Humphrey, Reed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119
_version_ 1784662128673685504
author Ryo, Emily
Humphrey, Reed
author_facet Ryo, Emily
Humphrey, Reed
author_sort Ryo, Emily
collection PubMed
description This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in naturalization approvals based on applicants’ race/ethnicity, gender, and religion, controlling for individual applicant characteristics, adjudication years, and variation between field offices. Non-White applicants and Hispanic applicants are less likely to be approved than non-Hispanic White applicants, male applicants are less likely to be approved than female applicants, and applicants from Muslim-majority countries are less likely to be approved than applicants from other countries. In addition, race/ethnicity, gender, and religion interact to produce a certain group hierarchy in naturalization approvals. For example, the probability of approval for Black males is 5 percentage points smaller than that of White females. The probability of approval for Blacks from Muslim-majority countries is 9 percentage points smaller than that of Whites from other countries. The probability of approval for females from Muslim-majority countries is 6 percentage points smaller than that of females from other countries. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of inequalities present in agency decision-making in the naturalization process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88923112022-03-04 The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States Ryo, Emily Humphrey, Reed Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in naturalization approvals based on applicants’ race/ethnicity, gender, and religion, controlling for individual applicant characteristics, adjudication years, and variation between field offices. Non-White applicants and Hispanic applicants are less likely to be approved than non-Hispanic White applicants, male applicants are less likely to be approved than female applicants, and applicants from Muslim-majority countries are less likely to be approved than applicants from other countries. In addition, race/ethnicity, gender, and religion interact to produce a certain group hierarchy in naturalization approvals. For example, the probability of approval for Black males is 5 percentage points smaller than that of White females. The probability of approval for Blacks from Muslim-majority countries is 9 percentage points smaller than that of Whites from other countries. The probability of approval for females from Muslim-majority countries is 6 percentage points smaller than that of females from other countries. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of inequalities present in agency decision-making in the naturalization process. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-22 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8892311/ /pubmed/35193975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Ryo, Emily
Humphrey, Reed
The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title_full The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title_fullStr The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title_full_unstemmed The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title_short The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
title_sort importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the united states
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoemily theimportanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates
AT humphreyreed theimportanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates
AT ryoemily importanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates
AT humphreyreed importanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates