Cargando…
The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States
This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in natural...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119 |
_version_ | 1784662128673685504 |
---|---|
author | Ryo, Emily Humphrey, Reed |
author_facet | Ryo, Emily Humphrey, Reed |
author_sort | Ryo, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in naturalization approvals based on applicants’ race/ethnicity, gender, and religion, controlling for individual applicant characteristics, adjudication years, and variation between field offices. Non-White applicants and Hispanic applicants are less likely to be approved than non-Hispanic White applicants, male applicants are less likely to be approved than female applicants, and applicants from Muslim-majority countries are less likely to be approved than applicants from other countries. In addition, race/ethnicity, gender, and religion interact to produce a certain group hierarchy in naturalization approvals. For example, the probability of approval for Black males is 5 percentage points smaller than that of White females. The probability of approval for Blacks from Muslim-majority countries is 9 percentage points smaller than that of Whites from other countries. The probability of approval for females from Muslim-majority countries is 6 percentage points smaller than that of females from other countries. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of inequalities present in agency decision-making in the naturalization process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8892311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88923112022-03-04 The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States Ryo, Emily Humphrey, Reed Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences This study presents an empirical investigation of naturalization adjudication in the United States using new administrative data on naturalization applications decided by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services between October 2014 and March 2018. We find significant group disparities in naturalization approvals based on applicants’ race/ethnicity, gender, and religion, controlling for individual applicant characteristics, adjudication years, and variation between field offices. Non-White applicants and Hispanic applicants are less likely to be approved than non-Hispanic White applicants, male applicants are less likely to be approved than female applicants, and applicants from Muslim-majority countries are less likely to be approved than applicants from other countries. In addition, race/ethnicity, gender, and religion interact to produce a certain group hierarchy in naturalization approvals. For example, the probability of approval for Black males is 5 percentage points smaller than that of White females. The probability of approval for Blacks from Muslim-majority countries is 9 percentage points smaller than that of Whites from other countries. The probability of approval for females from Muslim-majority countries is 6 percentage points smaller than that of females from other countries. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of inequalities present in agency decision-making in the naturalization process. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-22 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8892311/ /pubmed/35193975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Ryo, Emily Humphrey, Reed The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title | The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title_full | The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title_fullStr | The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title_short | The importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the United States |
title_sort | importance of race, gender, and religion in naturalization adjudication in the united states |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114430119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryoemily theimportanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates AT humphreyreed theimportanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates AT ryoemily importanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates AT humphreyreed importanceofracegenderandreligioninnaturalizationadjudicationintheunitedstates |