Cargando…
Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and bi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119 |
_version_ | 1784662147884646400 |
---|---|
author | Lark, Tyler J. Hendricks, Nathan P. Smith, Aaron Pates, Nicholas Spawn-Lee, Seth A. Bougie, Matthew Booth, Eric G. Kucharik, Christopher J. Gibbs, Holly K. |
author_facet | Lark, Tyler J. Hendricks, Nathan P. Smith, Aaron Pates, Nicholas Spawn-Lee, Seth A. Bougie, Matthew Booth, Eric G. Kucharik, Christopher J. Gibbs, Holly K. |
author_sort | Lark, Tyler J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8892349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88923492022-03-04 Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard Lark, Tyler J. Hendricks, Nathan P. Smith, Aaron Pates, Nicholas Spawn-Lee, Seth A. Bougie, Matthew Booth, Eric G. Kucharik, Christopher J. Gibbs, Holly K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-14 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8892349/ /pubmed/35165202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Physical Sciences Lark, Tyler J. Hendricks, Nathan P. Smith, Aaron Pates, Nicholas Spawn-Lee, Seth A. Bougie, Matthew Booth, Eric G. Kucharik, Christopher J. Gibbs, Holly K. Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title | Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title_full | Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title_fullStr | Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title_short | Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard |
title_sort | environmental outcomes of the us renewable fuel standard |
topic | Physical Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larktylerj environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT hendricksnathanp environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT smithaaron environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT patesnicholas environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT spawnleesetha environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT bougiematthew environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT boothericg environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT kucharikchristopherj environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard AT gibbshollyk environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard |