Cargando…

Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard

The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lark, Tyler J., Hendricks, Nathan P., Smith, Aaron, Pates, Nicholas, Spawn-Lee, Seth A., Bougie, Matthew, Booth, Eric G., Kucharik, Christopher J., Gibbs, Holly K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119
_version_ 1784662147884646400
author Lark, Tyler J.
Hendricks, Nathan P.
Smith, Aaron
Pates, Nicholas
Spawn-Lee, Seth A.
Bougie, Matthew
Booth, Eric G.
Kucharik, Christopher J.
Gibbs, Holly K.
author_facet Lark, Tyler J.
Hendricks, Nathan P.
Smith, Aaron
Pates, Nicholas
Spawn-Lee, Seth A.
Bougie, Matthew
Booth, Eric G.
Kucharik, Christopher J.
Gibbs, Holly K.
author_sort Lark, Tyler J.
collection PubMed
description The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88923492022-03-04 Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard Lark, Tyler J. Hendricks, Nathan P. Smith, Aaron Pates, Nicholas Spawn-Lee, Seth A. Bougie, Matthew Booth, Eric G. Kucharik, Christopher J. Gibbs, Holly K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-14 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8892349/ /pubmed/35165202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Lark, Tyler J.
Hendricks, Nathan P.
Smith, Aaron
Pates, Nicholas
Spawn-Lee, Seth A.
Bougie, Matthew
Booth, Eric G.
Kucharik, Christopher J.
Gibbs, Holly K.
Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title_full Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title_fullStr Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title_full_unstemmed Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title_short Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
title_sort environmental outcomes of the us renewable fuel standard
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101084119
work_keys_str_mv AT larktylerj environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT hendricksnathanp environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT smithaaron environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT patesnicholas environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT spawnleesetha environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT bougiematthew environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT boothericg environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT kucharikchristopherj environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard
AT gibbshollyk environmentaloutcomesoftheusrenewablefuelstandard