Cargando…

A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea

INTRODUCTION: To report for the first time the image quality of mammograms performed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) using the Perfect, Good, Moderate, Inadequate (PGMI) image evaluation system (IES); and to benchmark the image quality against BreastScreen Australia (BSA) National Accreditation Standards...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pape, Ruth, Spuur, Kelly Maree, Wilkinson, Jenny Maree, Zuhukepe, Aileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.538
_version_ 1784662164194197504
author Pape, Ruth
Spuur, Kelly Maree
Wilkinson, Jenny Maree
Zuhukepe, Aileen
author_facet Pape, Ruth
Spuur, Kelly Maree
Wilkinson, Jenny Maree
Zuhukepe, Aileen
author_sort Pape, Ruth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To report for the first time the image quality of mammograms performed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) using the Perfect, Good, Moderate, Inadequate (PGMI) image evaluation system (IES); and to benchmark the image quality against BreastScreen Australia (BSA) National Accreditation Standards (NAS). METHODS: A retrospective image quality analysis of the de‐identified mammograms of 102 women imaged at the Port Moresby General Hospital (PMGH) was undertaken using the PGMI IES. Each craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) image was assigned a grade and the reasons for the grade recorded. Age was recorded in years. Simple frequency analysis was undertaken and comparison with BSA NAS 2.4 was made. RESULTS: Women were aged between 25 and 74 years. There were 111 CC views and 109 MLO views. The most frequent individual grade for the CC view was G (83.8%) and for the MLO view M (72.48%); and for a routine series (four images), P and G combined (14.8%). Non‐visualisation of the IMA (28%), nipple not in profile (26%) and short length of pectoral muscle (12%) were the most cited reasons for assigning an M grade. CONCLUSION: The reported image quality is not commensurate with that required by BSA (P and G > 50%) and while common positioning errors can be rectified through education and training, it is also important to recognise the complex challenges faced by PNG radiographers in obtaining mammographic images that extend beyond education and training and reflect the emerging nature of the modality as well as wider health, economic and other issues. This work raises the need for national standards, dedicated equipment, and radiographer education to best serve the women of PNG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88924222022-03-10 A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea Pape, Ruth Spuur, Kelly Maree Wilkinson, Jenny Maree Zuhukepe, Aileen J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: To report for the first time the image quality of mammograms performed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) using the Perfect, Good, Moderate, Inadequate (PGMI) image evaluation system (IES); and to benchmark the image quality against BreastScreen Australia (BSA) National Accreditation Standards (NAS). METHODS: A retrospective image quality analysis of the de‐identified mammograms of 102 women imaged at the Port Moresby General Hospital (PMGH) was undertaken using the PGMI IES. Each craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) image was assigned a grade and the reasons for the grade recorded. Age was recorded in years. Simple frequency analysis was undertaken and comparison with BSA NAS 2.4 was made. RESULTS: Women were aged between 25 and 74 years. There were 111 CC views and 109 MLO views. The most frequent individual grade for the CC view was G (83.8%) and for the MLO view M (72.48%); and for a routine series (four images), P and G combined (14.8%). Non‐visualisation of the IMA (28%), nipple not in profile (26%) and short length of pectoral muscle (12%) were the most cited reasons for assigning an M grade. CONCLUSION: The reported image quality is not commensurate with that required by BSA (P and G > 50%) and while common positioning errors can be rectified through education and training, it is also important to recognise the complex challenges faced by PNG radiographers in obtaining mammographic images that extend beyond education and training and reflect the emerging nature of the modality as well as wider health, economic and other issues. This work raises the need for national standards, dedicated equipment, and radiographer education to best serve the women of PNG. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-21 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8892422/ /pubmed/34418330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.538 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pape, Ruth
Spuur, Kelly Maree
Wilkinson, Jenny Maree
Zuhukepe, Aileen
A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title_full A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title_fullStr A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title_full_unstemmed A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title_short A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea
title_sort review of mammographic image quality in papua new guinea
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.538
work_keys_str_mv AT paperuth areviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT spuurkellymaree areviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT wilkinsonjennymaree areviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT zuhukepeaileen areviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT paperuth reviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT spuurkellymaree reviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT wilkinsonjennymaree reviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea
AT zuhukepeaileen reviewofmammographicimagequalityinpapuanewguinea